Role of inertial properties of the upper limb on the perception of the boundary of peripersonal space;Rôle des propriétés inertielles segmentaires sur la perception de l'étendue de l'espace péripersonnel

Psychologie Francaise

Volumn 54, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 225-239

  Bourgeois, J ^a   Coello, Y ^a,b  

^a Univ Lille   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE LILLE   (France)

Author keywords

Inertial perturbation; Motor cognition; Peripersonnal space; Sensorimotor adaptation; Spatial vision

Indexed keywords

EID: 69549130716     PISSN: 00332984     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.psfr.2009.04.001     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Berkeley, G. (1709). Essai pour une nouvelle théorie de la vision. Trad. collective sous la direction de G. Brykman, Œuvres, Tome I, Paris, PUF, 1985.
2. Berti A., and Frassinetti F. When far becomes near: Remapping of space by tool use. Journal of cognitive neuroscience 12 (2000) 415-420
3. Bosbach S., Cole J., Prinz W., and Knoblich G. Inferring another's expectation from action: the role of peripheral sensation. Nature neuroscience 8 (2005) 1295-1297
4. Bourgeois, J., Bartolo, A., Coello, Y., submitted. Sensorimotor adaptation to a biased feedback modifies the visual perception of peripersonal space. Brain Research.
5. Brain W.R. Visual disorientation with special reference to lesions of the right cerebral hemisphere. Brain 64 (1941) 244-272
6. Brown S., and Cooke J. Responses to force perturbations preceding voluntary arm movements. Brain 220 2 (1981) 350-355
7. Carello C., Grosofsky A., Reichel F.D., Solomon H.Y., and Turvey M.T. Visually perceiving what is reachable. Ecological psychology 1 (1989) 27-54
8. Coello Y., and Delevoye-Turrell Y. Embodiement, space categorisation and action. Consciousness and cognition 16 (2007) 667-683
9. Coello, Y., Bartolo, A., Amiri, B., Houdayer, E., Derambure, P. (2008). Perceiving what is reachable depends on motor representations: A study using transcranial magnetic stimulation. Plos One, http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371% 2Fjournal.pone.0002862.
10. Coello Y., and Iwanow O. Effect of structuring the workspace on cognitive and sensorimotor distance estimation: no dissociation between perception and action. Perception and psychophysics 68 (2006) 278-289
11. Coello Y., Orliaguet J.P., and Prablanc C. Pointing movement in an artificial perturbing inertial field: a prospective paradigm for motor control study. Neuropsychologia 34 (1996) 879-892
12. Cowey A., Small M., and Ellis S. Left visuo-spatial neglect can be worse in far than in near space. Neuropsychologia 32 (1994) 1059-1066
13. Fischer M.H. Estimating reachabililty : Whole-body engagement or postural stability?. Human movement science 19 (2000) 297-318
14. Fischer M.H. Action simulation for others is not constrained by one's own postures. Neuropsychologia 43 (2005) 28-34
15. Gordon J., and Ghez C. Trajectory control in targeted force impulses. III. Compensatory adjustments for initial errors. Experimental brain research 67 (1987) 253-269
16. Halligan P.W., and Marshall J.C. Left neglect for near but not far space in man. Nature 350 (1991) 498-500
17. Hasan Z. The human motor control system's response to mechanical perturbation: should it, can it, and does it ensure stability?. Journal of motor behavior 37 (2005) 484-493
18. Helmholtz (von): Optique physiologique, volumes I et II, 1867 (Reprint, 1989). Édition Jacques Gabay, Paris.
19. James W. The principles of psychology (1890), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
20. Jeannerod M. The representing brain. Neural correlates of motor intention and imagery. Behavioral and brain sciences 17 (1994) 187-245
21. Jeannerod M. Neural simulation of action: a unifying mechanism for motor cognition. Neuroimage 14 (2001) S103-S109
22. Jeannerod M. The mechanism of self-recognition in humans. Behavioural brain research 142 (2003) 1-15
23. Jeannerod M. The origin of voluntary action: history of a physiological concept. Comptes rendus de l'academie des sciences-biologies 329 (2006) 354-362
24. Lafargue G., and Sirigu A. The nature of the sense of effort and its neural substratum. Revue neurologique 162 (2006) 703-712
25. Martel L., Grealy M.A., and Coello Y. Contribution of retinal and non retinal sources of visual information in egocentric object localisation for action. Current psychology letters 19 (2006). http://cpl.revues.org/document1099.html
26. Oldfield R.C. The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9 (1971) 97-113
27. Previc F.H. The neuropsychology of 3-D space. Psychological bulletin 124 (1998) 123-164
28. Proffitt D.R. Distance perception. Current directions in pyschological science 15 (2006) 131-135
29. Proffitt D.R. Embodied perception and the economy of action. Perspective on pyschological science 1 (2006) 110-122
30. Proffitt D.R., Stefanucci J., Banton T., and Epstein W. The role of effort in perceiving distance. Psychological science 14 (2003) 106-112
31. Redding G.M., and Wallace B. Adaptive spatial alignment (1997), Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ
32. Redding G.M., and Wallace B.J. Generalization of prism adaptation. Experimental psychology: Human perception & performance 32 (2006) 1006-1022
33. Robinovitch S.N. Perception of postural limits during reaching. Journal of motor behavior 30 (1998) 352-358
34. Rochat P., and Wraga M. An Account of the Systematic Error in Judging What Is Reachable. Journal of experimental psychology: Human perception and performance 23 (1997) 199-212
35. Sarlegna F. La main vers la cible: intégration multi-sensorielle et contrôle en ligne du mouvement de pointage. L'Annee psychologique 107 (2007) 303-336
36. Stock A., and Stock C. A short history of ideo-motor action. Psychological research 68 (2004) 176-188
37. Treisilian J.R., Mon-Williams M., and Kelly B.M. Increasing confidence in vergence as a cue to distance. Proceedings of the royal society London B 266 (1999) 39-44
38. Wolpert D.M., and Kawato M. Multiple paired forward and inverse models for motor control. Neural network 11 (1998) 1317-1329