Consumer demand for personalized nutrition and functional food

International Journal for Vitamin and Nutrition Research

Volumn 78, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 269-274

  Roosen, Jutta ^a   Bruhn, Maike ^b   Mecking, Rebecca Ariane ^b   Drescher, Larissa S ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KIEL   (Germany)

Author keywords

Attitude; Functional food; Personalized nutrition; Willingness to accept

Indexed keywords

ADULT; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE; CARDIOVASCULAR RISK; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONSUMER ATTITUDE; EUROPE; FEMALE; FOOD COMPOSITION; FOOD INDUSTRY; FUNCTIONAL FOOD; GENETIC RISK; GENETICS; GERMANY; HEALTH HAZARD; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INFORMATION; INTERNET; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MARKETING; NUTRIENT; NUTRITION; NUTRITIONAL ASSESSMENT;

ADULT; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES; DIET THERAPY; FEMALE; FOOD; GERMANY; HEALTH CARE SURVEYS; HEALTH SERVICES NEEDS AND DEMAND; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NUTRIGENOMICS; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE;

EID: 69549102407     PISSN: 03009831     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1024/0300-9831.78.6.269     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Margaret, A. (2002) Concepts of functional foods. Brussels: ILSI Europe: concise monograph series.
2. Euromonitor (2004). The world market for functional food and beverages. Euromonitor, London. pp. 278.
3. Dustmann, H. (2006) Markterfolg mit Functional Food - Der schmale Grad auf dem Web zum Top-Produkt. Deutscher Fachverlag, Frankfurt.
4. Gray, J., Armstrong, G. and Farley, H. (2003) Opportunities and constraints in the functional food market. Nutrition and Food Science. 33, 213-218. (Pubitemid 37298521)
5. Urala, N. and Lähteenmäki, L. (2003) Reasons behind consumers' functional food choices. Nutrition and Food Science. 33, 148-158. (Pubitemid 36967055)
6. Krystallis, A., Maglaras, G. and Mamalis, S. (2008) Motivations and cognitive structures of consumers in their purchasing of functional foods. Food Quality and Preferences. 19, 525-538.
7. Verbeke, W. (2005) Consumer acceptance of functional foods: socio-demoraphic, cognitive and attitudinal determinants. Food Quality and Preferences. 16, 45-57.
8. Bech-Larsen, T. and Scholderer, J. (2007) Functional Foods in Europe: Consumer Research, Market Experiences and Regulatory Aspects. Trends in Food Science and Technology. 18, 231-234.
9. Schöffski, O. and Schulenburg, J.-M. Graf v. d. (2007). Gesundheitsökonomische Evaluationen. Third Editions, Heidelberg, Springer.
10. Roininen, K., Tuorila, H., Zandstra, E.H., Graaf, C. de, Vehkalahti, K., Stubenitsky, K., and Mela, D.J. (2001) Differences in health and taste attitudes and reported behaviour among Finnish, Dutch and British consumers: a cross-national validation of the Health and Taste Attitude Scales (HTAS). Appetite. 37, 33-45.
11. Teratanavat, R. and Hooker, N.H., 2005. Exploring Consumer Valuation and Preference Heterogeneity for Functional Foods Using a Choice Experiment: A Case Study of Tomato Juice Containing Soy in Ohio. Paper presented at the 2005 Annual Meeting of the American Association of Agricultural Economists, Rhode Island.
12. Castle, D., Cline, C., Daar, A.S., Tsamis, C. and Singer, P.A. (2006) Nutrients and norms: Ethical issues in nutritional genomics. In: Kaput, J. and R.L. Rodriguez, Nutritional genomics - Discovering the path to personalized nutrition. John Wiley, Hoboken (New Jersey).
13. Christoph, I.B., M. Bruhn, und J. Roosen, 2008. Knowledge, attitudes towards and acceptability of genetically modified products in Germany. Appetite. 51, 58-68.
14. Marette, S., Roosen, J., Blanchemanche, S. and Feinblatt- Mélèze, E. (2008) Functional Food and Consumers' Information: A Lab Experiment with Enriched Yogurts for Lowering Cholesterol. Unpublished Working Paper, Munich, Technische Universitaet Muenchen, Chair for Marketing and Consumer Research, 33 pages.