The role of sentinel node biopsy in gynecological cancer: A review

Current Opinion in Oncology

Volumn 21, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 425-432

  Oonk, Maaike H M ^a,b   Van De Nieuwenhof, Hedwig P ^a,b   De Hullu, Joanne A ^a,b   Van Der Zee, Ate G J ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^b RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Cervical cancer; Endometrial cancer; Sentinel lymph node; Vulvar cancer

Indexed keywords

CANCER RADIOTHERAPY; CANCER RECURRENCE; CANCER STAGING; CANCER SURGERY; CANCER SURVIVAL; CLINICAL TRIAL; ENDOMETRIUM CANCER; HUMAN; LAPAROTOMY; LYMPH NODE DISSECTION; LYMPH NODE METASTASIS; LYMPHADENECTOMY; MORBIDITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY; REVIEW; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SENTINEL LYMPH NODE BIOPSY; SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA; TUMOR VOLUME; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER; VULVA CANCER;

ENDOMETRIAL NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; GENITAL NEOPLASMS, FEMALE; HUMANS; LYMPHATIC METASTASIS; NEOPLASM STAGING; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SENTINEL LYMPH NODE BIOPSY; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS; VULVAR NEOPLASMS;

EID: 69549088905     PISSN: 10408746     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/CCO.0b013e32832f3d53     Document Type: Review

References (53)

1. Veronesi U, Paganelli G, Viale G, et al. A randomized comparison of sentinel-node biopsy with routine axillary dissection in breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2003; 349:546-553. (Pubitemid 36951366)
2. Morton DL, Thompson JF, Cochran AJ, et al. Sentinel-node biopsy or nodal observation in melanoma. N Engl J Med 2006; 355:1307-1317. (Pubitemid 44465459)
3. Pugliese MS, Beatty JD, Tickman RJ, et al. Impact and outcomes of routine microstaging of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer: significance of the pN0(i+) and pN1mi categories. Ann Surg Oncol 2009; 16:113-120. In this study, 954 sentinel nodes were revised. The more sensitive evaluation of sentinel nodes led to the increased identification of very small metastases. In this series, no differences in survival between pN0i-, pN0i+ and pN1mi categories for breast cancer were found.
4. Riber-Hansen R, Sjoegren P, Hamilton-Dutoit SJ, Steiniche T. Extensive pathological analysis of selected melanoma sentinel lymph nodes: high metastasis detection rates at reduced workload. Ann Surg Oncol 2008; 15:1492-1501. An analysis of 920 sentinel nodes showing that combining complete step sectioning with immunohistochemistry ensures high metastasis detection rates. Study also focuses on reduced workload when performing ultrastaging only on those sentinel nodes most likely to contain metastases, that is, those with the highest gamma counts.
5. Van der Zee AG, Oonk MH, de Hullu JA, et al. Sentinel node detection is safe in the treatment of early-stage vulvar cancer. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26:884-889. The largest study on the application of the sentinel node procedure in early-stage vulvar cancer. In 259 patients with unifocal vulvar cancer and a negative sentinel node, six groin recurrences were observed. The results of this observational study led to implementation of the sentinel node procedure in the standard treatment of early-stage vulvar cancer patients.
6. Hacker NF. Vulvar Cancer. In: Berek JS, Hacker NF, editors. Practical gynecologic oncology, 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2005. pp. 543-583.
7. Homesley HD, Bundy BN, Sedlis A, et al. Assessment of current International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging of vulvar carcinoma relative to prognostic factors for survival (a Gynecologic Oncology Group study). Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991; 164:997-1003.
8. Oonk MH, Hollema H, de Hullu JA, van der Zee AG. Prediction of lymph node metastases in vulvar cancer: a review. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2006; 16:963-971. (Pubitemid 43886711)
9. Selman TJ, Luesley DM, Acheson N, et al. A systematic review of the accuracy of diagnostic tests for inguinal lymph node status in vulvar cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2005; 99:206-214. (Pubitemid 41354603)
10. Carlson JW, Kauderer J, Walker JL, et al. A randomized phase III trial of VH fibrin sealant to reduce lymphedema after inguinal lymph node dissection: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol 2008; 110:76-82. A study on application of VH fibrin sealant (Tisseel; Baxter Healthcare Corporation, Glendale, California, USA) after lymphadenectomy. The fibrin sealant did not reduce lymphedema. However, the study provides a well documented overview on the complications of lymphadenectomy.
11. Levenback C, Burke TW, Gershenson DM, et al. Intraoperative lymphatic mapping for vulvar cancer. Obstet Gynecol 1994; 84:163-167. (Pubitemid 24234819)
12. De Hullu JA, van der Zee AGJ. Surgery and radiotherapy in vulvar cancer. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2006; 60:38-58.
13. Hampl M, Hantschmann P, Michels W, et al. Validation of the accuracy of the sentinel lymph node procedure in patients with vulvar cancer: results of a multicenter study in Germany. Gynecol Oncol 2008; 111:282-288. A largest accuracy study on sentinel node biopsy in vulvar cancer. The false-negative rate was relatively high (7.7%), which might be explained by the less strict inclusion criteria in this study (T1-3, no experience required).
14. Rodier JF, Janser JC, Routiot T, et al. Sentinel node biopsy in vular malignancies: a preliminary feasibility study. Oncol Rep 1999; 6:1249-1252.
15. Terada KY, Shimizu DM, Jiang CS, Wong JH. Outcomes for patients with T1 squamous cell cancer of the vulva undergoing sentinel node biopsy. Gynecol Oncol 2006; 102:200-203.
16. Vidal-Sicart S, Puig-Tintoré LM, Lejárcequi JA, et al. Validation and application of the sentinel lymph node concept in malignant vulvar tumours. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2007; 34:384-391. (Pubitemid 46295354)
17. Oonk MH, van Os MA, de Bock GH, et al. A comparison of quality of life between vulvar cancer patients after sentinel node procedure only and inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy. Gynecol Oncol 2009; 113:301-305. First study comparing quality of life after sentinel node biopsy alone and lymphadenectomy in vulvar cancer patients. No differences in overall quality of life were observed.
18. Moore RG, Robison K, Brown AK, et al. Isolated sentinel lymph node dissection with conservation management in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva: a prospective trial. Gynecol Oncol 2008; 109:65-70. Study on application of sentinel node procedure in 35 patients. A relatively high false-negative rate of 6.4% was observed. However, no immunohistochemistry was performed on these sentinel nodes.
19. Johann S, Klaeser B, Krause T, Mueller MD. Comparison of outcome and recurrence-free survival after sentinel lymph node biopsy and lymphadenectomy in vulvar cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2008; 100:324-328.
20. Knopp S, Nesland JM, Trope C. SLNB and the importance of micrometastases in vulvar squamous cell carcinoma. Surg Oncol 2008; 17:219-225. A complete overview of literature on sentinel node micrometastases in vulvar cancer.
21. Tjin Asjou FM, van Bekkum E, Ewing P, et al. Sentinel node procedure in vulvar squamous cell carcinoma: a histomorphologic review of 32 cases. The significance of anucleate structures on immunohistochemistry. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2008; 18:1032-1036. First study on significance of anucleate structures on immunohistochemistry in the sentinel node. Authors concluded that these structures had no clinical significance, and sentinel nodes in these cases should be regarded as negative.
22. Levenback CF, van der Zee AG, Rob L, et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with gynecologic cancers. Expert panel statement from the International Sentinel Node Society Meeting, February 21, 2008. Gynecol Oncol 2009 [Epub ahead of print]. This study presents the opinion of the experts on indications, technical considerations and directions for future investigation regarding the sentinel node procedure in gynecologic cancers.
23. Hacker NF. Cervical cancer. In: Berek JS, Hacker NF, editors. Practical gynecologic oncology, 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2005. pp. 337-395.
24. Peters WA 3rd, Liu PY, Barrett RJ 2nd, et al. Concurrent chemotherapy and pelvic radiation therapy compared with pelvic radiation therapy alone as adjuvant therapy after radical surgery in high-risk early-stage cancer of the cervix. J Clin Oncol 2000; 18:1606-1613.
25. Beesley V, Janda M, Eakin E, et al. Lymphedema after gynaecological cancer treatment: prevelance, correlates, and supportive care needs. Cancer 2007; 109:2607-2614. (Pubitemid 46906482)
26. Díaz-Feijoo B, Gil-Moreno A, Pérez-Benavente MA, et al. Sentinel lymph node identification and radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in early stage cervical cancer: laparoscopy versus laparotomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2008; 15:531-537. Equal results for sentinel node biopsy with radical hysterectomy by laparoscopy and laparotomy were reported in this study in patients with early stage cervical cancer, with lower morbidity in the laparoscopy group.
27. Echt ML, Finan MA, Hoffman MS, et al. Detection of sentinel lymph nodes with lymphazurin in cervical, uterine, and vulvar malignancies. South Med J 1999; 92:204-208.
28. Frumovitz M, Ramirez PT, Levenback CF. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node detection in women with cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2008; 110:S17-S20. This review provides an excellent overview of the published literature for lymphatic mapping in cervical cancer patients.
29. Altgassen C, Hertel H, Brandstädt A, et al. Multicenter validation study of the sentinel lymph node concept in cervical cancer: AGO study Group. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26:2943-2951. The largest multicenter study on the application of the sentinel lymph node procedure in cervical cancer. Overall sensitivity was low (77.4%); however, subgroup analyses of patients with tumors of less than 2cm showed promising results.
30. Bats AS, Lavoué V, Rouzier R, et al. Limits of day-before lymphoscintigraphy to localize sentinel nodes in women with cervical cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2008; 15:2173-2179.
31. Kara PP, Ayhan A, Caner B, et al. Sentinel lymph node detection in early stage cervical cancer: a prospective study comparing preoperative lymphoscintigraphy, intraoperative gamma probe, and blue dye. Ann Nucl Med 2008; 22:487-494. Study on application of the sentinel node procedure in early-stage cervical cancer, including ultrastaging of the sentinel node. More metastases were detected by performing ultrastaging on the removed sentinel nodes.
32. Fader AN, Edwards RP, Cost M, et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in earlystage cervical cancer: utility of intraoperative versus postoperative assessment. Gynecol Oncol 2008; 111:13-17. Lack of sensitivity for intraoperative pathologic assessment of sentinel nodes was shown in this accuracy study on sentinel node identification in cervical cancer.
33. Van de Lande J, Davelaar EM, von Mensdorff-Pouilly S, et al. SCC-Ag, lymph node metastases and sentinel node procedure in early stage squamous cell cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2009; 112:119-125. Apart from reporting the accuracy of the sentinel node procedure in cervical cancer patients, authors also analyzed the predictive value of SCC. It is suggested that patients with a negative sentinel node and elevated SCC might also benefit from lymphadenectomy.
34. Pluta M, Rob L, Charvat M, et al. Less radical surgery than radical hysterectomy in early stage cervical cancer: a pilot study. Gynecol Oncol 2009; 113:181-184. A combination of laparoscopic lymphadenectomy with vaginal hysterectomy is described as a less radical treatment option for early-stage sentinel node-negative cervical cancer patients.
35. Bader AA, Winter R, Haas J, Tamussino KF.Where to look for the sentinel lymph node in cervical cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 19:678e1-678e7.
36. Hauspy J, Beiner M, Harley I, et al. Sentinel lymph nodes in early stage cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2007; 105:285-290. (Pubitemid 46590354)
37. Euscher ED, Malpica A, Atkinson EN, et al. Ultrastaging improves detection of metastases in sentinel lymph nodes of uterine cervix squamous cell carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 2008; 32:1336-1343. This study showed 20% of sentinel node metastases in cervical cancer patients was detected by ultrastaging. Authors conclude examination of sentinel nodes should be aimed at optimizing detection of most metastases, this should include ultrastaging.
38. Daraï E, Rouzier R, Ballester M, et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in gynaecological cancers: the importance of micrometastases in cervical cancer. Surg Oncol 2008; 17:227-235. A clarifying review on the importance of micrometastases in cervical cancer, concluding accumulated data argue in favor of the prognostic value of micrometastases. Authors plea for the use of consensual definition of micrometastases.
39. Gien LT, Covens A. Quality control in sentinel lymph node biopsy in cervical cancer. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26:2930-2931.
40. Creasman WT, Morrow CP, Bundy BN, et al. Surgical pathologic spread patterns of endometrial cancer. A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Cancer 1987; 60:2035-2041.
41. ASTEC study group, Kitchener H, Swart AM, Qian Q, et al. Efficacy of systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer (MRC ASTEC trial): a randomized study. Lancet 2009; 373:125-136. One of the largest studies on surgical techniques in gynecologic oncology. Randomized 1408 women with early endometrial cancer for standard surgery with or without lymphadenectomy. The results showed no evidence of benefit in terms of survival. Study concludes pelvic lymphadenectomy cannot be recommended as routine procedure for therapeutic purposes outside of clinical trials.
42. Burke TW, Levenback D, Tornos C, et al. Intraabdominal lymphatic mapping to direct selective pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy in women with high-risk endometrial cancer: results of a pilot study. Gynecol Oncol 1996; 62:169-173. (Pubitemid 26274795)
43. Delpech Y, Cortez A, Coutant C, et al. The sentinel node concept in endometrial cancer: histopathologic validation by serial sectioning and immunohistochemistry. Ann Oncol 2007; 18:1799-1803. (Pubitemid 350111567)
44. Delpech Y, Coutant C, Darai E, Barranger E. Sentinel lymph node evaluation in endometrial cancer and the importance of micrometastases. Surg Oncol 2008; 17:237-245. In this review, a high incidence of micrometastases in endometrial cancer was found (up to 25%).
45. Ballester M, Dubernard G, Rouzier R, et al. Use of the sentinel node procedure to stage endometrial cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2008; 15:1523-1529. In this study, 46 patients with endometrial cancer underwent the sentinel node procedure by cervical injection, followed by pelvic lymphadenectomy. Ultrastaging of the sentinel node was performed. They found a detection rate of 87% and metastases in 25% of the patients (no false negatives).
46. Abu-Rustum NR, Khoury-Collado F, Pandit-Taskar N, et al. Sentinel lymph node mapping for grade 1 endometrial cancer: is it the answer to the surgical staging dilemma? Gynecol Oncol 2009; 113:163-169. A study on 42 endometrial cancer patients. The sentinel lymph node procedure with injection of blue dye and a radioactive tracer reached an identification rate of 86%. No false negatives were observed.
47. Bats AS, Clément D, Larousserie F, et al. Does sentinel node biopsy improve the management of endometrial cancer? Data from 43 patients. J Surg Oncol 2008; 97:141-145. (Pubitemid 351169043)
48. Barranger E, Delpech Y, Coutant C, et al. Laparoscopic sentinel node mapping using combined detection for endometrial cancer: a study of 33 cases - is it a promising technique? Am J Surg 2009; 197:1-7. In this study, the sentinel node procedure is applied in 33 patients with endometrial cancer using the combined technique and pericervical injections. An identification rate of 81.8% and no false negative were observed.
49. Clement D, Bats AS, Ghazzar-Pierquet N, et al. Sentinel lymph nodes in endometrial cancer: is hysteroscopic injection valid. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 2008; 29:239-241. (Pubitemid 351744484)
50. Perrone AM, Casadio P, Formelli G, et al. Cervical and hysteroscopic injection for identification of sentinel lymph node in endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2008; 111:62-67. In this study, two types of tracer injection were compared: cervical and hysteroscopic injection. They conclude both procedures are feasible, but the hysteroscopic procedure might represent the only method able to highlight the complete lymphatic drainage of the uterus as suggested by the presence of paraaortic-positive SLN only in this group.
51. Robova H, Charvat M, Strnad P, et al. Lymphatic mapping in endometrial cancer: comparison of hysteroscopic and subserosal injection and the distribution of sentinel lymph nodes. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2009; 19:391-394. A comparison was made between hysteroscopic and subserosal injection of tracer for sentinel node detection in endometrial cancer. Results were in favor of subserosal injection.
52. Khoury-Collado F, Abu-Rustum NR. Lymphatic mapping in endometrial cancer: a literature review of current techniques and results. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2008; 18:1163-1168.
53. Ballester M, Rouzier R, Coutant C, et al. Limits of lymphoscintigraphy for sentinel node biopsy in women with endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2009; 112:348-352. A retrospective study showing the poor correlation between day-before lymphoscintigraphy and surgical sentinel lymph node mapping in patients with endometrial cancer.