Sentinel lymph node biopsy in early-stage cervical cancer: Utility of intraoperative versus postoperative assessment

Gynecologic Oncology

Volumn 111, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 13-17

  Fader, A Nickles ^a,c   Edwards, R P ^a,b,c   Cost, M ^b,c   Kanbour Shakir, A ^a,c   Kelley, J L ^a,c   Schwartz, B ^a,c   Sukumvanich, P ^a,c   Comerci, J ^a,c   Sumkin, J ^c,d   Elishaev, E ^a,c   Rohan, L Cencia ^a,b,c,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

Author keywords

Cervical cancer; Sentinel lymph node; Sentinel lymph node detection in cervical cancer

Indexed keywords

CYTOKERATIN; ISOSULFAN BLUE; TECHNETIUM SULFUR COLLOID TC 99M;

ADENOSQUAMOUS CARCINOMA; ARTICLE; CANCER STAGING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LAPAROTOMY; LYMPH NODE METASTASIS; LYMPHOSCINTIGRAPHY; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENTINEL LYMPH NODE BIOPSY; SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA; TUMOR LOCALIZATION; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER; UTERINE CERVIX CYTOLOGY;

FEMALE; FROZEN SECTIONS; HUMANS; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; INTRAOPERATIVE CARE; LYMPH NODES; NEOPLASM STAGING; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; RADIONUCLIDE IMAGING; ROSANILINE DYES; SENTINEL LYMPH NODE BIOPSY; TECHNETIUM TC 99M SULFUR COLLOID; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS;

EID: 52249116069     PISSN: 00908258     EISSN: 10956859     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.06.009     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Lee Y.N., Wang K.L., Lin M.H., et al. Radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection for treatment of cervical cancer: a clinical review of 954 cases. Gynecol. Oncol 32 2 (1989 Feb) 135-142
2. Delgado G., Bundy B.N., Fowler W.C., et al. A prospective surgical pathological study of stage I squamous carcinoma of the cervix: a GOG study. Gynecol. Oncol 35 (1989) 314
3. Alvarez H.E., Potter M.E., Soong S.J., et al. Rationale for using pathologic tumor dimensions and nodal status to subclassify surgically treated Stage IB cervical cancer patients. Gynecol. Oncol 43 (1991) 181
4. Krag D., Weaver D., Ashikaga T., et al. The sentinel node in breast cancer-a multi-center validation study. N. Engl. J. Med 339 14 (1998 Oct) 941-946
5. Mansel R.E., Fallowfield L., Kissin M., et al. Randomized multi-center trial of sentinel node biopsy versus standard axillary treatment in operable breast cancer: the ALMANAC Trial. J Natl. Cancer Inst 98 9 (2006 May 3) 599-609
6. Gershenwald J.E., Thompson W., Mansfield P.F., et al. Multi-institutional melanoma lymphatic mapping experience: the prognostic value of sentinel lymph node status in 612 stage I or II melanoma patients. J. Clin. Oncol 17 3 (1999 Mar) 976-983
7. Frumovitz M., Ramirez P.T., Tortolero-Luna G., et al. Characteristics of recurrence in patients who underwent lymphatic mapping for vulvar cancer. Gynecol. Oncol. 92 1 (2004 Jan) 205-210
8. Malur S., Krause N., Kohler C., and Schneider A. Sentinel lymph node detection in patients with cervical cancer. Gynecol. Oncol 80 2 (2001) 254-257
9. Levenback C., Coleman R.L., Burke T.W., Erdman W., Deavers M., and Delpassand E.S. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel node identification in patients with cervix cancer undergoing radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy. J. Clin. Oncol 20 3 (2002) 688-693
10. Angioli R., Palaia I., Cipriani C., Muzii L., Calcagno M., Gullotta G., and Panici P.B. Role of sentinel lymph node biopsy procedure in cervical cancer: a critical point of view. Gynecol. Oncol. 96 2 (2005) 504-509
11. Rob L., Strnad P., Robova H., et al. Study of lymphatic mapping and sentinel node identification in early stage cervical cancer. Gynecol. Oncol 98 (2005) 281-288
12. Frumovitz M., Coleman R.L., Gayed I.W., et al. Usefulness of preoperative lymphoscintigraphy in patients who undergo radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for cervical cancer. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol 194 (2006) 1186-1195
13. Wydra, Sawicki S., et al. Sentinel node identification in cervical cancer patients undergoing transperitoneal radical hysterectomy: a study of 100 cases. Int. J. Gyne. Can. 16 2 (2006) 649-654
14. Hauspy J., Beiner M., Harley I., et al. Sentinel lymph nodes in early stage cervical cancer. Gynecol. Oncol. 105 2 (2007) 285-290
15. Kushner D.M., Connor J.P., Wilson M.A., et al. Laparoscopic sentinel lymph node mapping for cervix cancer-a detailed evaluation and time analysis. Gynecol. Oncol 106 3 (2007 Sep) 507-512
16. Coutant C., Morel O., Delpech Y., Uzan S., Darai E., and Barranger E. Laparoscopic sentinel node biopsy in cervical cancer using a combined detection: 5-years experience. Ann. Surg. Oncol 14 8 (2007 Aug) 2392-2399
17. Barranger E., Cortez A., Uzan S., et al. Value of intraoperative imprint cytology of sentinel nodes in patients with cervical cancer. Gynecol. Oncol. 94 1 (2004) 175-180
18. Roy M, Plante M, et al: Annual Meeting on Women's Cancers. 2006;
19. Brommeland T., Lindal S., Straume B., Dahl I.L., and Hennig R. Does imprint cytology of brain tumors improve intraoperative diagnosis?. Acta. Neurologica Scandinavica. 108 3 (2003 Sept) 153-156
20. De Mascarel I, Macgrogan G, Debled M, Brouste V, Mauriac L, Distinction between isolated tumor cells and micrometastasis in breast cancer: is it reliable and useful? Cancer. 2008 Feb 19;
21. Fregnani J.H., Latorre M.R., Novik P.R., Lopes A., and Soares F.A. Assessment of pelvic lymph node micrometastatic disease in stages IB and IIA of carcinoma of the uterine cervix. In. J. Gynecol Cancer 16 3 (2006 May-Jun) 1188-94l
22. Bleiweiss I.J., Nagi C.S., and Jaffer S. Axillary sentinel lymph nodes can be falsely positive due to iatrogenic displacement and transport of benign epithelial cells in patients with breast carcinoma. J. Clin. Oncol. 24 13 (2006) 1978-1979