Clinical Indication and Patient Age Predict Likelihood of Malignancy in Suspicious Breast MRI Lesions

Academic Radiology

Volumn 16, Issue 10, 2009, Pages 1281-1285

  Gutierrez, Robert L ^a,b   DeMartini, Wendy B ^a,b   Eby, Peter ^a,b   Kurland, Brenda F ^c   Peacock, Sue ^a,b   Lehman, Constance D ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b SEATTLE CANCER CARE ALLIANCE   (United States)

^c Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center   (United States)

Author keywords

age; Breast MRI; clinical indication; diagnostic; high risk; malignancy; mammography; screening

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANAMNESIS; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; BREAST LESION; CANCER GRADING; CANCER RISK; CANCER SCREENING; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CLINICAL INDICATION; FEMALE; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HUMAN; INTRADUCTAL CARCINOMA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; ONSET AGE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MIDDLE AGED; PROGNOSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; WASHINGTON; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 69449095845     PISSN: 10766332     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2009.04.012     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Lehman C.D., and Schnall M.D. Imaging in breast cancer: magnetic resonance imaging. Breast Cancer Res 7 (2005) 215-219
2. Lehman C.D., Blume J.D., Weatherall P., et al. Screening women at high risk for breast cancer with mammography and magnetic resonance imaging. Cancer 103 (2005) 1898-1905
3. Lehman C.D., Schnall M.D., Kuhl C.K., et al. Report of the Working Groups on Breast MRI: report of the High-Risk Screening Group. Breast J 10 Suppl 2 (2004) S98-S12
4. Liberman L., Mason G., Morris E.A., et al. Does size matter? Positive predictive value of MRI-detected breast lesions as a function of lesion size. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186 (2006) 426-430
5. Demartini W.B., Lehman C.D., Peacock S., et al. Computer-aided detection applied to breast MRI: assessment of CAD-generated enhancement and tumor sizes in breast cancers before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Acad Radiol 12 (2005) 806-814
6. Harms S.E., and Flamig D.P. MR imaging of the breast: technical approach and clinical experience. Radiographics 13 (1993) 905-912
7. Lehman C.D., Blume J.D., Thickman D., et al. Added cancer yield of MRI in screening the contralateral breast of women recently diagnosed with breast cancer: results from the International Breast Magnetic Resonance Consortium (IBMC) trial. J Surg Oncol 92 (2005) 9-15 discussion 15-16
8. Schnall M.D., Blume J., Bluemke D.A., et al. MRI detection of distinct incidental cancer in women with primary breast cancer studied in IBMC 6883. J Surg Oncol 92 (2005) 32-38
9. Bedrosian I., Mick R., Orel S.G., et al. Changes in the surgical management of patients with breast carcinoma based on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Cancer 98 (2003) 468-473
10. Tan J.E., Orel S.G., Schnall M.D., Schultz D.J., and Solin L.J. Role of magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance imaging-guided surgery in the evaluation of patients with early-stage breast cancer for breast conservation treatment. Am J Clin Oncol 22 (1999) 414-418
11. Lehman C.D., Gatsonis C., Kuhl C.K., et al. MRI evaluation of the contralateral breast in women with recently diagnosed breast cancer. N Engl J Med 356 (2007) 1295-1303
12. Dee K.E., and Sickles E.A. Medical audit of diagnostic mammography examinations: comparison with screening outcomes obtained concurrently. AJR Am J Roentgenol 176 (2001) 729-733
13. Sohlich R.E., Sickles E.A., Burnside E.S., and Dee K.E. Interpreting data from audits when screening and diagnostic mammography outcomes are combined. AJR Am J Roentgenol 178 (2002) 681-686
14. Sickles A.E., Miglioretti D.L., Ballard-Barbash R., et al. Performance benchmarks for diagnostic mammography. Radiology 235 (2005) 775-790
15. Ries L.A.G., Harkins D., Krapcho M., et al. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2003 (2006), National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
16. Brown M.L., Houn F., Sickles E.A., and Kessler L.G. Screening mammography in community practice: positive predictive value of abnormal findings and yield of follow-up diagnostic procedures. AJR Am J Roentgenol 165 (1995) 1373-1377
17. Kerlikowske K., Grady D., Barclay J., et al. Positive predictive value of screening mammography by age and family history of breast cancer. JAMA 270 (1993) 2444-2450
18. Barlow W.E., White E., Ballard-Barbash R., et al. Prospective breast cancer risk prediction model for women undergoing screening mammography. J Natl Cancer Inst 98 (2006) 17
19. Liang K.-Y., and Zeger S.L. Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika 7 (1986) 13-22
20. Liberman L., Morris E.A., Lee M.J., et al. Breast lesions detected on MR imaging: features and positive predictive value. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179 (2002) 171-178
21. Nunes L.W., Schnall M.D., Orel S.G., et al. Breast MR imaging: interpretation model. Radiology 202 (1997) 833-841
22. Kuhl C.K., Mielcareck P., Klaschik S., et al. Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions?. Radiology 211 (1999) 101-110
23. Kinkel K., Helbich T.H., Esserman L.J., et al. Dynamic high-spatial-resolution MR imaging of suspicious breast lesions: diagnostic criteria and interobserver variability. AJR Am J Roentgenol 175 (2000) 35-43
24. Nunes L.W., Schnall M.D., and Orel S.G. Update of breast MR imaging architectural interpretation model. Radiology 219 (2001) 484-494
25. Nunes L.W., Schnall M.D., Siegelman E.S., et al. Diagnostic performance characteristics of architectural features revealed by high spatial-resolution MR imaging of the breast. AJR Am J Roentgenol 169 (1997) 409-415
26. Schnall M.D., Blume J., Bluemke D.A., et al. Diagnostic architectural and dynamic features at breast MR imaging: Multicenter study. Radiology 238 (2006) 42-53
27. Han B.K., Schnall M.D., Orel S.G., et al. Outcome of MRI-guided breast biopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191 (2008) 1798-1804
28. American College of Radiology Web site. Guidelines and Standards. Available at: http://www.acr.org/SecondaryMainMenuCategories/quality_safety/guidelines/breast.aspx Accessed February 3, 2009.
29. Eby P.R., Demartini W.B., Peacock S., et al. Cancer yield of probably benign breast MR examinations. J Magn Reson Imaging 26 (2007) 950-955