Cancer yield of probably benign breast MR examinations

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 26, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 950-955

  Eby, Peter R ^a,b,c   DeMartini, Wendy B ^a,b   Peacock, Sue ^a,b   Rosen, Eric L ^a,b   Lauro, Bridget ^a   Lehman, Constance D ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b SEATTLE CANCER CARE ALLIANCE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

BI RADS; Breast; Breast neoplasms; Magnetic resonance imaging; Probably benign

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BENIGN TUMOR; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER SURGERY; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALIGNANT NEOPLASTIC DISEASE; MASTECTOMY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;

BIOPSY; BREAST; BREAST NEOPLASMS; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAMMOGRAPHY; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RADIOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 35148874333     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: 15222586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.21123     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Sickles EA. Periodic mammographic follow-up of probably benign lesions: results in 3,184 consecutive cases. Radiology 1991;179:463-468.
2. Varas X, Leborgne F, Leborgne JH. Nonpalpable, probably benign lesions: role of follow-up mammography. Radiology 1992;184:409-414.
3. Varas X, Leborgne JH. Leborgne F, Mezzera J, Jaumandreu S, Leborgne F. Revisiting the mammographic follow-up of BI-RADS category 3 lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002;179:691-695.
4. Vizcaino I, Gadea L, Andreo L, et al. Short-term follow-up results in 795 nonpalpable probably benign lesions detected at screening mammography. Radiology 2001;219:475-483.
5. HeMe MA, Pennes DR, Rebner M, Adler DD. Mammographic follow-up of low-suspicion lesions: compliance rate and diagnostic yield. Radiology 1991;178:155-158.
6. American College of Radiology (ACR). ACR BI-RADS - magnetic resonance imaging. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology; 2003.
7. Ikeda DM. Progress report from the American College of Radiology Breast MR Imaging Lexicon Committee. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2001;9:295-302, vi.
8. Ikeda DM, Baker DR, Daniel BL. Magnetic resonance imaging of breast cancer: clinical indications and breast MRI reporting system. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000;12:975-983.
9. Ikeda DM, Hylton NM, Kinkel K, et al. Development, standardization, and testing of a lexicon for reporting contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging studies. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001;13:889-895.
10. Schnall MD, Ikeda DM. Lesion Diagnosis Working Group report. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999;10:982-990.
11. Kriege M, Brekelmans CT, Boetes C, et al. Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition. N Engl J Med 2004;351:427-437.
12. Liberman L, Morris EA, Benton CL, Abramson AF, Dershaw DD. Probably benign lesions at breast magnetic resonance imaging: preliminary experience in high-risk women. Cancer 2003;98:377-388.
13. Sadowski EA, Kelcz F. Frequency of malignancy in lesions classified as probably benign after dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI examination. J Magn Reson Imaging 2005;21:556-564.
14. Kuhl CK, Schmutzler RK, Leutner CC, et al. Radiology 2000;215:267-279. Breast MR imaging in 192 women proved or suspected to be carriers of a breast cancer susceptibility gene. Preliminary results.