Critical dynamics in multicomponent lipid membranes

Physical Review E - Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics

Volumn 80, Issue 2, 2009, Pages

  Haataja, Mikko ^a  

^a Princeton University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ASYMMETRIC BILAYERS; ASYMPTOTIC DYNAMICS; COMPOSITIONAL HETEROGENEITY; CRITICAL DYNAMICS; CRITICAL POINTS; DOMAIN FORMATION; HYDRODYNAMIC INTERACTION; IN-VITRO; IN-VIVO; LIPID MEMBRANES; LIPID TRANSPORT; MODE COUPLING; MULTICOMPONENTS; RAPID COMMUNICATION; SCALING BEHAVIOR;

EQUATIONS OF STATE; FLUID DYNAMICS; HYDRODYNAMICS; LIPIDS; MEMBRANES; TRANSPORT PROPERTIES;

LIPID BILAYERS;

EID: 69449084856     PISSN: 15393755     EISSN: 15502376     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.80.020902     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. K. Simons and E. Ikonen, Nature (London) 387, 569 (1997). 10.1038/42408
2. D. A. Brown and E. London, Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 14, 111 (1998). 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.14.1.111
3. M. Edidin, Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 32, 257 (2003). 10.1146/annurev.biophys.32.110601.142439
4. L. A. Bagatolli and E. Gratton, J. Fluoresc. 11, 141 (2001). 10.1023/A:1012228631693
5. S. L. Veatch and S. L. Keller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 268101 (2002). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.268101
6. P. Cicuta, S. L. Keller, and S. L. Veatch, J. Phys. Chem. B 111, 3328 (2007). 10.1021/jp0702088
7. S. L. Veatch, P. Cicuta, P. Sengupta, A. Honerkamp-Smith, D. Holowka, and B. Baird, ACS Chem. Biol. 3, 287 (2008). 10.1021/cb800012x
8. A. R. Honerkamp-Smith, S. L. Veatch, and S. L. Keller, Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1788, 53 (2009). 10.1016/j.bbamem.2008.09.010
9. P. B. Sunil Kumar, G. Gompper, and R. Lipowsky, Phys. Rev. E 60, 4610 (1999). 10.1103/PhysRevE.60.4610
10. Y. Jiang, T. Lookman, and A. Saxena, Phys. Rev. E 61, R57 (2000). 10.1103/PhysRevE.61.R57
11. J. L. McWhirter, G. Ayton, and G. A. Voth, Biophys. J. 87, 3242 (2004). 10.1529/biophysj.104.045716
12. A. Radhakrishnan and H. McConnell, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102, 12662 (2005). 10.1073/pnas.0506043102
13. M. Laradji and P. B. Sunil Kumar, Phys. Rev. E 73, 040901 (R) (2006). 10.1103/PhysRevE.73.040901
14. I. R. Cooke and M. Deserno, Biophys. J. 91, 487 (2006). 10.1529/biophysj.105.078683
15. G. Illya, R. Lipowsky, and J. C. Shillcock, J. Chem. Phys. 125, 114710 (2006). 10.1063/1.2353114
16. P. G. Saffman and M. Delbrück, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 72, 3111 (1975). 10.1073/pnas.72.8.3111
17. B. D. Hughes, B. A. Pailthorpe, and L. R. White, J. Fluid Mech. 110, 349 (1981). 10.1017/S0022112081000785
18. E. Falck, T. Rog, M. Karttunen, and I. Vattulainen, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 44 (2008). 10.1021/ja7103558
19. J. Fan, M. Sammalkorpi, and M. Haataja, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 178102 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.178102
20. G. A. Ayton, J. L. McWhirter, P. McMurtry, and G. A. Voth, Biophys. J. 88, 3855 (2005). 10.1529/biophysj.105.059436
21. P. C. Hohenberg and B. I. Halperin, Rev. Mod. Phys. 49, 435 (1977). 10.1103/RevModPhys.49.435
22. Y. Tserkovnyak and D. R. Nelson, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103, 15002 (2006). 10.1073/pnas.0606992103
23. D. Jasnow and J. Viñals, Phys. Fluids 8, 660 (1996). 10.1063/1.868851
24. Allowing for the two leaflets of the bilayer to slide relative to each other would lead to a frictional force term of the form - ξ2 bΔ uM between the leaflets, where b denotes the intermonolayer friction coefficient and Δ uM denotes the difference in the leaflet velocities. Asymptotically, when ξ→, the intermonolayer friction dominates and leads to the spatial synchronization of the leaflet velocity fields.
25. E. P. Petrov and P. Schwille, Biophys. J. 94, L41 (2008). 10.1529/biophysj.107.126565
26. E. A. Evans and R. C. Hochmut, Biophys. J. 16, 1 (1976). 10.1016/S0006-3495(76)85658-5
27. For critical bulk fluids, it has been shown via rigorous renormalization-group (RG) arguments that this assumption is justified; see, e.g., E. D. Siggia, B. I. Halperin, and P. C. Hohenberg, Phys. Rev. B 13, 2110 (1976). In particular, the RG result for the viscous drag force on the domain differs from the simple mode-coupling one by a numerical prefactor ∼O (1). Furthermore, inclusion of inertia and fluctuations will lead to a renormalization of ηM. 10.1103/PhysRevB.13.2110
28. H. A. Stone and A. Ajdari, J. Fluid Mech. 369, 151 (1998).
29. M. Grant and K. R. Elder, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 14 (1999). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.14
30. A. Sain and M. Grant, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 255702 (2005). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.255702
31. K. Inaura and Y. Fujitani, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 77, 114603 (2008). 10.1143/JPSJ.77.114603