Relationships between students' strategies for influencing their study environment and their strategic approach to studying

Studies in Higher Education

Volumn 34, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 139-152

  Jungert, Tomas ^a   Rosander, Michael ^a  

^a LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 69249185379     PISSN: 03075079     EISSN: 1470174X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03075070802596970     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Abrandt Dahlgren, M. 2000. Portraits of PBL: Course objectives and students' study strategies in computer engineering, psychology and physiotherapy. Instructional Science 28: 309-29.
2. Astin, A. 1999. Involvement in learning revisited: Lessons we have learned. Journal of College Student Development 40: 587-98.
3. Barrows, H.S. 1994. Practice-based learning: Problem-based learning applied to medical education. Springfield, IL: Southern Illinois University School of Medicine.
4. Bateson, R., and J. Taylor. 2004. Student involvement in university life beyond political activism and university governance: A view from Central and Eastern Europe. European Journal of Education 39: 471-83.
5. Biggs, J. 1987. Student approaches to learning and studying. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.
6. Case, J., and R. Gunstone. 2003. Going deeper than deep and surface approaches: A study of students' perceptions of time. Teaching in Higher Education 8: 55-69.
7. Diseth, Å. 2001. Validation of a Norwegian version of the Approaches and Study Skills Inventory for Students (ASSIST): Application of structural equation modelling. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 45: 381-94.
8. Diseth, Å. 2007. Approaches to learning, course experience and examination grade among undergraduate psychology students: Testing of mediator effects and construct validity. Studies in Higher Education 32: 373-88.
9. Edvardsson Stiwne, E. 2006. Situated conceptions of learning and the reforming of an engineering programme. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education 5: 353-6.
10. Eizenberg, N. 1988. Approaches to learning anatomy: Developing a program for pre-clinical medical students. In Improving learning: New perspectives, ed. P. Ramsden, 178-98. London: Kogan Page.
11. Entwistle, N., and V. McCune. 2004. The conceptual bases of study strategy inventories. Educational Psychology Review 16: 325-45.
12. Entwistle, N., J. Nisbet, and A. Bromage. 2004. Teaching-learning environments and student learning in electronic engineering. Paper presented at Third Workshop of the European Network on Powerful Learning Environments, in Brugge, September 30-October 2, 2004. http://www.etl.tla.ed.ac.uk/publications.html
13. Entwistle, N., and E. Peterson. 2004. Conceptions of learning and knowledge in higher education: Relationships with study behaviour and influences of learning environments. International Journal of Educational Research 41: 407-28.
14. Entwistle, N., and P. Ramsden. 1983. Understanding student learning. London: Croom Helm.
15. Entwistle, N., and C. Smith. 2002. Personal understanding and target understanding: Mapping influences on the outcomes of learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology 72: 321-42.
16. Entwistle, N., and S. Waterston. 1988. Approaches to studying and levels of processing in university students. British Journal of Educational Psychology 58: 258-65.
17. Gallagher, S.S. 1997. Problem-based learning: Where did it come from, what does it do, and where is it going? Journal for the Education of the Gifted 20: 332-62.
18. Jungert, T. 2006. The effects of the CDIO curriculum on engineering students' experiences of their study environment. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education 5: 357-60.
19. Jungert, T. 2008a. Opportunities of student influence as a context for the development of engineering students' study motivation. Social Psychology of Education 11: 79-94.
20. Jungert, T. 2008b. A longitudinal study of engineering students' approaches to their studies. Higher Education Research and Development 27: 201-14.
21. Kember, D. 2004. Interpreting student workload and the factors which shape students' perceptions of their workload. Studies in Higher Education 29: 165-84.
22. Kuh, G. 1993. In their own words: What students learn outside the classroom. American Educational Research Journal 30: 277-304.
23. Kuh, G., T.N. Laird, and P. Umbach. 2004. Aligning faculty activities and student behavior: Realizing the promise of greater expectations. Liberal Education 90: 24-31.
24. Lohman, M., and M. Finkelstein. 2000. Designing groups in problem-based learning to promote problem-solving skill and self-directedness. Instructional Science 28: 291-307.
25. Marton, F., and R. Säljö. 1976. On qualitative differences in learning. I - Outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology 46: 4-11.
26. Marton, F., and R. Säljö. 1997. Approaches to learning. In The experience of learning, ed. F. Marton, D.J. Hounsell, and N. Entwistle, 2nd ed., 39-58. Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press. (Only available at http://www.ed.ac.uk/etl/publications.html)
27. McCune, V., and J. Hounsell. 2005. The development of students' ways of thinking and practising in three final-year biology courses. Higher Education 49: 255-89.
28. Miller, C.M.L., and M. Parlett. 1974. Up to the mark: A study of the examination game. London: Society for Research into Higher Education.
29. National Agency for Higher Education. 2003. Förnyad granskning och bedömning av kvalitetsarbetet vid Linköpings universitet, Högskoleverkets rapportserie 2003:9R. [Renewed review and assessment of the quality work of Linköping University]. Stockholm: NAHE.
30. Pascarella, E. 1980. Student-faculty informal contact and college outcomes. Review of Educational Research 50: 545-95.
31. Pascarella, E., and P. Terenzini. 2005. How college affects students. 2nd ed. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
32. Pintrich, P., D. Smith, T. Garcia, and W. McKeachie. 1993. Reliability and predictive validity of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement 53: 801-13.
33. Scheja, M. 2006. Delayed understanding and staying in phase: Students' perceptions of their study situation. Higher Education 52: 421-45.
34. Schmeck, R., E. Geisler-Brenstein, and S. Cercy. 1991. Self-concept and learning: The revised inventory of learning processes. Educational Psychology 11: 343-62.
35. Tait, H., N. Entwistle, and V. McCune. 1998. ASSIST: A reconceptualization of the Approaches to Studying Inventory. In Improving student learning: Improving students as learners, ed. C. Rust, 262-71. Oxford: Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development.
36. Terenzini, P., E. Pascarella, and G. Blimling. 1999. Students' out-of-class experiences and their influence on learning and cognitive development: A literature review. Journal of College Student Development 40: 610-23.
37. Vermunt, J. 1998. The regulation of constructive learning processes. British Journal of Educational Psychology 68: 149-71.
38. Wilding, J., and B. Andrews. 2006. Life goals, approaches to study and performance in an undergraduate cohort. British Journal of Educational Psychology 76: 171-82.