Considerations and limitations related to conceptualizing and measuring textbook integrity

Mathematics Teachers at Work: Connecting Curriculum Materials and Classroom Instruction

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 70-84

  Chval, Kathryn B ^a   Chávez, Óscar ^a   Reys, Barbara J ^a,b   Tarr, James ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

^b Center for the Study of Mathematics Curriculum   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 69249162684     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203884645     Document Type: Chapter

References (28)

1. Ben-Peretz, M. (1990). The teacher-curriculum encounter: Freeing teachers from the tyranny of texts. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
2. Cai, J., Grouws, D. A., Kehle, P., Kilpatrick, J., Lambdin, D. V., Moyer, J. C. et al. (2007, March). Designing longitudinal studies of curricula: Insights from three NSF-funded projects. Presented at the research presession of the Annual Meeting of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Atlanta, GA.
3. Cho, J. (1998, April). Rethinking curriculum implementation: Paradigms, models, and teachers' work. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
4. Chval, K., Reys, R., Reys, B., Tarr, J., & Chávez, O. (2006). Pressures to improve student performance:A context that both urges and impedes school-based research. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 37(3), 158-166.
5. Fullan, M., & Pomfret, A. (1977). Research on curriculum and instruction implementation. Review of Educational Research, 47(1), 335-397.
6. Grouws, D. A., & Smith, M. S. (2000). NAEP findings on the preparation and practices of mathematics teachers. In E. A. Silver & P. A. Kenney (Eds.), Results from the seventh mathematics assessment of the National Assessment of Educational Progress (pp. 107-139). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
7. Hall, G. E., & Loucks, S. F. (1981). Program definition and adaptation: Implications for inservice. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 14(2), 46-58.
8. Huntley, M. (2006, April). Using CBAM theory to study implementation of two middle-grades mathematics curricula: Connected Mathematics and Math Thematics. Paper presented at the research presession of the Annual Meeting of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, St Louis, MO.
9. Kilpatrick, J. (2003). What works? In S. L. Senk, & D. R. Thompson (Eds.), Standards-based school mathematics curricula: What are they? What do students learn? (pp. 471-488). Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum.
10. Lambdin, D. V., & Preston, R. V. (1995). Caricatures in innovation: Teacher adaptation to an investigation-oriented middle school mathematics curriculum. Journal of Teacher Education, 46(2), 130-140.
11. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
12. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1991). Professional standards for teaching mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
13. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1995). Assessment standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
14. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
15. National Research Council. (2002). Scientific research in education. Committee on Scientific Principles for Education Research. R. J. Shavelson, & L. Towne (Eds.). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
16. National Research Council. (2004). On evaluating curricular effectiveness: Judging the quality of K-12 mathematics evaluations. Committee for a Review of the Evaluation Data on the Effectiveness of NSF-Supported and Commercially Generated Mathematics Curriculum Materials. J. Confrey, & V. Stohl (Eds.). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
17. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425 (2002).
18. Remillard, J. T. (2005). Examining key concepts in research on teachers' use of mathematics curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75(2), 211-246.
19. Romberg, T. A., & Shafer, M. C. (Eds.). (2004). Purpose, plans, goals, and conduct of the study (Mathematics in Context Longitudinal/Cross-Sectional Study Monograph # 1). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin, Wisconsin Center for Education Research.
20. Ruiz-Primo, M. A. (2005, April). A multi-method and multi-source approach for studying fidelity of implementation. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.
21. Senk, S. L., & Thompson, D. R. (Eds.). (2003). Standards-based school mathematics curricula: What are they? What do students learn? Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
22. Snyder, J., Bolin, F., & Zumwalt, K. (1992). Curriculum implementation. In P. W. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum: A project of the American Educational Research Association (pp. 402-435). New York, NY: Macmillan.
23. Spillane, J. P., & Zeuli, J. S. (1999). Reform and teaching: Exploring patterns of practice in the context of national and state mathematics reforms. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21(1), 1-27.
24. Stein, M. K., Remillard, J. T., & Smith, M. S. (2007). How curriculum influences student learning. In F. K. Lester Jr. (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 319-369). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
25. Tarr, J. E., Chávez, O., Reys, R. E., & Reys, B. J. (2006). From the written to the enacted curricula:The intermediary role of middle school mathematics teachers in shaping students' opportunity to learn. School Science and Mathematics, 106(4), 191-201.
26. Tarr, J. E., Reys, R. E., & Reys, B. J., Chávez, O., Shih, J., & Osterlind, S. (2008). The impact of middle grades mathematics curricula and the classroom learning environment on student achievement. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39(3), 247-280.
27. Whitehurst, G. J. (2003, April). The Institute of Education Sciences: New wine, new bottles. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL. Retrieved October 15, 2003, from http://www.ed.gov/rschstat/research/pubs/ies.pdf.
28. Whittington, D. (2002). 2000 national survey of science and mathematics education: Status of middle school mathematics teaching. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research.