Comparison of Recycle Chromatography and Simulated Moving Bed for Pseudobinary Separations

Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research

Volumn 48, Issue 16, 2009, Pages 7724-7732

  Lee, Ju Weon ^a,b   Wankat, Phillip C ^a  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Inha University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADSORPTION BEHAVIOR; BATCH CHROMATOGRAPHY; DEOXYADENOSINE; DESORBENT-TO-FEED RATIO; DYNAMIC SIMULATION; INDUSTRIAL SEPARATION; LANGMUIR ISOTHERM; LOWER PRESSURES; MAXIMUM PRODUCTIVITY; MODEL SYSTEM; OPERATING CONDITION; PSEUDO-BINARIES; RECYCLE STREAM; SIMULATED MOVING BED; SIMULATED MOVING BED PROCESS;

ADSORPTION; ATMOSPHERIC TEMPERATURE; CHROMATOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS; COMPUTER SIMULATION LANGUAGES; DROPS; PRESSURE DROP; PRODUCTIVITY; RECYCLING; SEPARATION; TERNARY SYSTEMS;

COLUMN CHROMATOGRAPHY;

EID: 69249132421     PISSN: 08885885     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ie900092y     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Seidel-Morgenstern, A.; Guiochon, G. Theoretical Study of Recycling in Preparative Chromatography. AIChE J. 1993, 39, 809.
2. Grill, G. M. Closed-Loop Recycling with Periodic Intra-Profile Injection: A New Binary Preparative Chromatographic Technique. J. Chro-matoer. A 1998, 796, 101.
3. Lee, J. W.; Wankat, P. C. Optimized Design of Recycle Chroma- tography for Separation of a Single Component From a Ternary Mixture. Ind. Ene. Chem. Res. 2008, 47, 9601.
4. Pais, L. S.; Loureiro, J. M.; Rodrigues, A. E. Chiral Separation by SMB Chromatography. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2000, 20, 67.
5. Strube, J.; Haumreisser, S.; Schmidt-Traub, H.; Schulte, M.; Ditz, R. Comparison of Batch Elution and Continuous Simulated Moving Bed Chromatography. Org. Process Res. Dev. 1998, 2, 305.
6. Broughton, D. B.; Neuzil, R. W.; Pharis, J. M.; Brearley, C. S. The Parex Process for Recovering Paraxylene. Chem. Eng. J. Prog. 1970, 66, 70.
7. Storti, G.; Mazzotti, M.; Morbidelli, M.; Carra, S. Robust Design of Binary Countercurrent Adsorption Separation Processes. AIChE J. 1993, 39, 471.
8. Rhee, H.-K.; Aris, R.; Amundson, N. R. First Order Partial Differential Equations; Prentice-Hall:Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1986.
9. Migliorini, C.; Mazzotti, M.; Morbidelli, M. Design of Simulated Moving Bed Multicomponent Separation: Langmuir Systems. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2000, 20, 79.
10. Lee, J. W.; Kim, J. I.; Lee, C. H.; Kim, J. K.; Koo, Y.-M. Design and Sensitivity Analysis of Simulated Moving Bed Chromatography to Separate Sugar Alcohols. J. Liq. Chromatoer. Relat. Technol. 2007, 30, 1859.
11. Paredes, G.; Abel, S.; Mazzotti, M.; Morbidelli, M.; Stadler, J. Analysis of a Simulated Moving Bed Operation for Three-Fraction Separations (3F-SMB). Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2004, 43, 6157.
12. Bird, R. B.; Stewart, W. E.; Lightfoot, E. N. Transport Phenomena; John Wiley &Sons: New York, 1965.
13. Carver, M. B.; Hinds, H. W. The Method of Lines and the Advection Equation. Simulation 1978, 31, 59.
14. van Deemter, J. J.; Zuiderweg, F. J.; Klinkenberg, A. Longitudinal Diffusion and Resistance to Mass Transfer as Causes of Nonideality in Chromatography. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1956, 5, 271.
15. Lunemann-Hombourger, O.; Nicoud, R. M.; Bailly, M. The"VARI- COL" Process: A New Multicolumn Continuous Chromatographic Process. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2000, 35, 1829.
16. Schramm, H.; Kaspereit, M.; Kienle, A.; Seidel-Morgenstern, A. Improving Simulated Moving Bed Process by Cyclic Modulation of the Feed Concentration. Chem. Eng. Technol. 2002, 24, 1151.
17. Zang, Y.; Wankat, P. C. SMB Operation Strategy-Partial Feed. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2002, 41, 2504.
18. Wang, X.; Ching, C. B. Chiral Separation of β-Blocker Drug (Nadolol) by Five-Zone Simulated Moving Bed Chromatography. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2005, 60, 1337.
19. Burden, R. L.; Faires, J. D. Numerical Analysis, 5th ed.; PWS: Boston, 1993.