Targeted assessment rubric: An empirically grounded rubric for interdisciplinary writing

Journal of Higher Education

Volumn 80, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 334-353

  Mansilla, Veronica Boix ^a   Duraisingh, Elizabeth Dawes ^a   Wolfe, Christopher R ^b   Haynes, Carolyn ^b  

^a HARVARD GRADUATE SCHOOL OF EDUCATION   (United States)

^b MIAMI UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 69249095815     PISSN: 00221546     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1353/jhe.0.0044     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Astin, A. W. (1993). Assessment for excellence: The philosophy and practice of assessment and evaluation in higher education. Phoenix, AZ: Oryx Press.
2. Banta, T. W. (Ed.). (2002). Building a scholarship of assessment. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
3. Boix Mansilla, V. (2005). Assessing student work at disciplinary crossroads. Change 37 (January/February), 14-21.
4. Boix Mansilla, V., & Dawes Duraisingh, E. (2007). Targeted assessment of students' interdisciplinary work: An empirically grounded framework proposed. The Journal of Higher Education 78(2), 215-237.
5. Boix Mansilla, V., & Gardner, H. (1998). What are the qualities of disciplinary understanding? In M. S. Wiske (Ed.), Teaching for understanding: Linking research with practice (pp. 161-196). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
6. Boix Mansilla, V., Miller, W. C., & Gardner, H. (2000). On disciplinary lenses and interdisciplinary work. In P. Grossman & S. Wineburg (Eds.), Interdisciplinary curriculum: challenges to implementation (pp. 17-38). New York: Teachers College Press.
7. Brough, J. A., & Pool, J. E. (2005). Integrating learning and assessment: The development of an assessment culture. In J. Etim (Ed.) Curriculum integration K-12: Theory and practice (pp. 196-204). Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
8. Chun, C. (2002). Looking where the light is better: A review of the literature on assessing higher education quality. Peer Review, Winter/Spring, 16-25. Retrieved June 13, 2007, from http://www.aacu.org/peerreview/pr-sp02/pr- sp02feature3.cfm
9. Cizek, G. J. (2000). Pockets of resistance in the assessment revolution. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practices, 19(2), 16-23.
10. Ewell, P. T. (1991). To capture the ineffable: New forms of assessment in higher education. Review of Research in Education, (17), 75 -125.
11. Gardner, H. (2000). The disciplined mind: Beyond facts and standardized tests, the K-12 education that every child deserves. New York: Penguin Books.
12. Gardner, H., & Boix Mansilla, V. (1994). Teaching for understanding in the disciplines and beyond. Teacher College Record, 96(2), 198-218.
13. Goodrich-Andrade, H. (2006). The trouble with a narrow view of rubrics. English Journal, 95(6), 9.
14. Haag, A. (2006, September). A Testing Experience. Nature 443, 265-267.
15. Haynes, C. (2004). Promoting self-authorship through an interdisciplinary writing curriculum. In M. B. Baxter Magolda & P. M. King (Eds.) Learning partnerships: Theory and models of practice to educate for self-authorship (pp. 63-90). Sterling, VA: Stylus.
16. Huba, M. E., & Freed, J. E. (2000). Learner centered assessment on college campuses: Shifting the focus from teaching to learning. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
17. Huber, M. T., & Hutchings, P. (2004). Integrative learning: Mapping the terrain. Washington: Association of American Colleges and Universities.
18. Hutchings, P. T. (1990). Learning over time: Portfolio assessment. American Association of Higher Education Bulletin, 42, 6-8.
19. Klein, J. T. (1996). Crossing boundaries: Knowledge, disciplinarities, and interdiscipli-narities. Charlottesville, VA and London: University Press of Virginia.
20. Kockelmans, J. J. (1979). Why interdisciplinarity? In Kockelmans (Ed.) Interdiscipli-narity and Higher Education. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
21. Kohn, A. (2006). The trouble with rubrics. English Journal, 95(4).
22. Levy, F., & Murnane, R. (2004). The new division of labor: How computers are creating the next job market. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
23. National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine of the National Academies (2005). Facilitating interdisciplinary research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
24. National Institutes of Health (2006). Research teams of the future. In NIH Roadmap for Medical Research. Retrieved June 17, 2007, from http://nihroadmap.nih.gov/ researchteams/
25. National Leadership Council for Liberal Education and America's Promise (2007). College learning for the new global century. Executive summary. Washington, DC: Association for American Colleges and Universities.
26. National Science Foundation (2006, September). Investing in America's future: Strategic Plan FY 2006-2011. Retrieved June 13, 2007, from http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2006/nsf0648/NSF-06-48.pdf
27. Newell, W. H. (1998) Interdisciplinarity: Essays from the literature. New York: The College Board.
28. Perkins, D. (1998). What is understanding? In M. S. Wiske (Ed.), Teaching for understanding: Linking research with practice (pp. 39-57). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
29. Rhoten, D., Boix Mansilla, V., Chun, M., & Klein, J. T. (2006). Interdisciplinary education at liberal arts institutions. Teagle Foundation White Paper. Retrieved June 13, 2007, from the Teagle Foundation Web site: http://www.teaglefoundation.org/learn-ing/pdf/2006-ssrc-whitepaper.pdf
30. Rhoten, D. & Pfirman, S. (2007). Women in interdisciplinary science: Exploring preferences and consequences. Research Policy, 36, 56-75.
31. Schilling, K. L. (2001). Interdisciplinary assessment for interdisciplinary programs. In B. L. Smith & J. McCann (Eds.), Reinventing ourselves: Interdisciplinary education, collaborative learning and experimentation in higher education (pp. 344-354). Bolton, MA: Anker Publishing Company.
32. Schneider, C. G. (2002). Can value added assessment raise the level of student accomplishment? Peer Review, 4(2/3), Winter/Spring.
33. Walvoord, B. E. F., & Anderson, V. J. (1998). Effective grading: A tool for learning and assessment. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
34. Weingart, P. & Stehr, N. (2000). Practicing Interdisciplinarity. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
35. Wilson, M. (2006). Rethinking rubrics in writing assessment. Portsmouth, NH: Heine-mann.
36. Wolfe, C.R., & Haynes, C. (2003). Interdisciplinary writing assessment profiles. Issues in Integrative Studies, 21, 126-170.