Stereotype Change in the Social Context

Stereotype Dynamics: Language-Based Approaches to the Formation, Maintenance, and Transformation of Stereotypes

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 29-57

  Yzerbyt, Vincent ^a   Carnaghi, Andrea ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ CATHOLIQUE DE LOUVAIN   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 69149086443     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203809990-9     Document Type: Chapter

References (88)

1. Abrams, D., and Hogg, M. A. (1988).Comments on the motivational status of self-esteem in social identity and intergroup discrimination. European Journal of Social Psychology 18 317-334.
2. Abrams, D., and Hogg, M. A. (1990).Social identification, self-categorization, and social influence. In W. Stroebe and M. Hewstone (Eds.), European Review of Social Psychology 1 195-228.
3. Abrams, D., Wetherell, M. S., Cochrane, S., Hogg, M. A., and Turner, J. C. (1990).Knowing what to think by knowing who you are: Self categorization and the nature of norm formation, conformity, and group polarization. British Journal of Social Psychology 29 97-119.
4. Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.
5. Asch, S. E. (1940). Studies in the principles of judgments and attitudes: II. Determination of judgments by group and by ego standards. Journal of Social Psychology, 12, 433-465.
6. Asch, S. E. (1951). Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgments. In H. Guetzkow (Ed.), Groups, leadership and men; research in human relations (pp. 177-190). Pittsburgh: Carnegie Press.
7. Asch, S. E. (1952).Social psychology EnglewoodCliffs NJ: Prentice-Hall.
8. Barreto, M., and Ellemers, N. (2000).You can’t always do what you want: Social identity and self-presentation determinants of the choice to work for a low status group. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 26 891-906.
9. Barreto, M., and Ellemers, N. (2003).The effect of being categorised: The interplay between internal and external social identities. European Review of Social Psychology 14 139-170.
10. Barreto, M., Spears, R., Ellemers, N., and Shahinper, K. (2003).Who wants to know? The effect of audience on identity expression among minority group members. British Journal of Social Psychology 42 299-318.
11. Bless, H., Schwarz, N., Bodenhausen, G. V., and Thiel, L. (2001).Personalized versus generalized benefits of stereotype disconfirmation: Trade-offs in the evaluation of atypical exemplars and their social groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 37 386-397.
12. Branscombe, N. R., Ellemers, N., Spears, R., and Doosje, B. (1999). The context and the content of social identity threat. In N. Ellemers, R. Spears, and B. Doosje (Eds.), Social identity: Context, commitment, content (pp. 35-58). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
13. Carnaghi, A., and Yzerbyt, V. Y. (2005).Subtyping in a social context: How the audience shapes stereotype change. Unpublished data Catholic University of Louvain
14. Carnaghi, A., and Yzerbyt, V. Y. (2006).Social consensus and the encoding of consistent and inconsistent information: When one’s future audience orients information processing. European Journal of Social Psychology 36 199-210.
15. Carnaghi, A., Yzerbyt, V. Y., Cadinu M., and Mahaux, N. (2005).Tell me who you are and I will tell you what I think: Stereotyping processes in a justification context. Italian Journal of Psychology 1 91-110.
16. Carnaghi, A., and Yzerbyt, V. Y. (in press). Subtyping and social consensus: the role of the audience in the maintenance of stereotypical beliefs. European Journal of Social Psychology.
17. Cialdini, R. B., Levy, A., Herman, C. P., and Evenbeck, S. (1973).Attitudinal politics: The strategy of moderation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 25 100-108.
18. Cialdini, R. B., Levy, A., Herman, C. P., and Evenbeck, S. (1973).Attitudinal politics: The strategy of moderation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 25 100-108.
19. Cialdini, R. B. (1988).Influence: Science and practice 2nd edition. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman and Co.
20. Clark, R. D., and Maass, A. (1988).The role of social categorization and perceived source credibility in minority influence. European Journal of Social Psychology 18 381-394.
21. Costarelli, S. (2000).Odi et Amo: ambivalenza attitudinale nei contesti inter-gruppo. Unpublished doctoral dissertation University of Bologna, Italy.
22. Coull, A., Yzerbyt, V. Y., Castano, E., Paladino, M. P., and Leemans, V. (2001).Protecting the in-group: Motivated allocation of cognitive resources in the presence of threatening in-group members. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations 4 327-339.
23. David, B., and Turner, J. C. (1996).Studies in self-categorization and minority conversion:Is being a member of the outgroup an advantage. British Journal of Social Psychology 35 179-201.
24. Deutsch, M., and Gerard, H. B. (1955).A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 51 629-636.
25. Dovidio, J. F., Glick, P., and Rudman, L. (2005).On the nature of prejudice: Fifty years after Allport Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
26. Dumont, M., Yzerbyt, V. Y., Wigboldus, D., and Gordijn, E. (2003).Social categorization and fear reactions to the September 11 th terrorist attacks. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 29 1509-1520.
27. Ellemers, N. (1993).The influence of socio-structural variables on identity management strategies. European Review of Social Psychology 4 27-57.
28. Fiske, S. T. (1980).Attention and weight in person perception: The impact of negative and extreme behaviour. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 38 889-906.
29. Fiske, S. T. (1998).Stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination In D
30. Fiske, and G. Lindzey (Eds.), The Handbook of Social Psychology (4th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 357-411). New York: McGraw-Hill.
31. Fiske, S. T. (2000).Stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination at the seam between the centuries: evolution, culture, mind, and brain. European Journal of Social Psychology 30 299-322.
32. Gordijn, E., Wigboldus, D., and Yzerbyt, V. Y. (2001).Emotional consequences of categorizing victims of negative outgroup behavior as ingroup or outgroup. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations 4 317-326.
33. Haslam, S. A., Oakes, P. J., Reynolds, K. J., and Turner, J. C. (1999).Social identity salience and the emergence of stereotype consensus. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 25 809-818.
34. Hewstone, M., Hassebrauck, M., Wirth, A., and Waenke, M. (2000).Pattern of disconfirming information and processing instructions as determinants of stereotype change. British Journal of Social Psychology 39 399-411.
35. Higgins, E. T., McCann, C. D., and Fondacaro, R. (1982).The “communication game”:Goal-directed encoding and cognitive consequences. Social Cognition 1 21-37.
36. Higgins, E. T., and McCann, C. D. (1984).Social encoding and subsequent attitudes, impressions, and memory: “Context-driven” and motivational aspects of processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 47 26-39.
37. Higgins, E. T., Rholes, W. S., and Jones, C. R. (1977).Category accessibility and impression formation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 13 141-154.
38. Hogg, M. A., and Turner, J.C. (1987).Intergroup behaviour, self-stereotyping and the salience of social categories. British Journal of Social-Psychology 26 325-340.
39. Johnston, L., and Hewstone, M. (1992).Cognitive models of stereotype change: (3) Subtyping and the perceived typicality of disconfirming group members. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 28 360-386.
40. Judd, C. M., and Park, B. (1993).Definition and assessment of accuracy in social stereotypes. Psychological Review 100 109-28.
41. Kashima, Y. (2000).Maintaining cultural stereotypes in the serial reproduction of narratives. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 26 594-604.
42. Kunda, Z., and Oleson, K. C. (1995).Maintaining stereotypes in the face of disconfirmation:Constructing grounds for subtyping deviants. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 68 565-79.
43. Kunda, Z., and Oleson, K. C. (1997).When exceptions prove the rule: How extremity of deviance determines the impact of deviant examples on stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 72 965-79.
44. Lerner, J. L., and Tetlock, P. E. (1999).Accounting for the effects of accountability. Psychological Bulletin 125 255-275.
45. Leyens, J.-P., Yzerbyt, V. Y., and Schadron, G. (1994).Stereotypes and Social Cognition. London:Sage.
46. Lyons, A., and Kashima, Y. (2003).How are stereotypes maintained through communication? The influence of stereotype sharedness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 85 989-1005.
47. Mackie, D. M. (1986).Social identification effects in group polarization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50 720-728.
48. Mackie, D. M., Devos, T., and Smith, E. R. (2000).Intergroup emotions: Explaining offensive action tendencies in an intergroup context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 79 602-616.
49. Marques, J. M., Yzerbyt, V. Y., and Leyens, J. P. (1988).The “Black Sheep effect”: Extremity of judgment towards ingroup members as a function of group identification. European Journal of Social Psychology 1 1-16.
50. Maurer, K. L., Park, B., and Rothbart, M. (1995).Subtyping versus subgrouping processes in stereotype representation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 69 812-824.
51. Moreno, K. N., and Bodenhausen, G. V. (1999).Resisting stereotype change: The role of motivation and attentional capacity in defending social belief. Group Processes and Intergroup relations 2 5-16.
52. Moscovici, S. (1976).Social Influence and Social Change New York: Academic Press.
53. Park, B., and Judd, C. M. (1990).Measures and model of perceived group variability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 59 173-191.
54. Park, B., Wolsko, C., and Judd, C. M. (2001).Measurement of subtyping in stereotype change. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 37 325-332.
55. Pennington, J., and Schlenker, B. R. (1999).Accountability for consequential decisions:Justifying ethical judgments to audiences. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 25 1067-1081.
56. Quinn, A., and Schlenker, B. R. (2002).Can accountability produce independence? Goals as determinants of the impact of accountability on conformity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 28 472-83.
57. Reicher, S., and Levine, M. (1994a).Deindividuation, power relations between groups and the expression of social identity: The effects of visibility to the out-group. British Journal of Social Psychology 33 145-163.
58. Reicher, S., and Levine, M. (1994b).On the consequences of deindividuation manipulations for the strategic considerations of the self: Identifiability and the presentation of social identity. European Journal of Social Psychology 24 511-524.
59. Reicher, S. D., Spears, R., and Postmes, T. (1995).A social identity model of deindividuation phenomena. European Review of Social Psychology 6 161-198.
60. Rothbart, M., and John, O. P. (1985).Social categorization and behavioral episodes: A cognitive analysis of the effects of intergroup contact. Journal of Social Issues 41 81-104.
61. Rothbart, M., and Lewis, S. (1988). Inferring category attributes from exemplar attributes. Geometric shapes and social categories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 861-872.
62. Ruscher, J. B., and Hammer, E. Y. (1996).Choosing to sever or maintain association induces biased impression formation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 70 701-712.
63. Ruscher, J. B., Fiske, S. T., and Schnake, S. B. (2000).The motivated tactician’s juggling act: Compatible vs. incompatible impression goals. British Journal of Social Psychology 39 241-256.
64. Ruscher, J. B., Hammer, E. Y., and Hammer, E. D. (1996).Forming shared impressions through conversation: An adaptation of the continuum model. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 22 705-720.
65. Schneider, D. J. (2004).The psychology of stereotyping. ew York: The Guilford Press.
66. Sechrist, G. B., and Stangor, C. (2001).Perceived consensus influences intergroup behavior and stereotype accessibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 80 645-654.
67. Sherif, M. (1966).In common predicament: Social psychology of intergroup conflict and cooperation Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
68. Sherman, J. W., Stroessner, S. J., Conrey, F. R., and Azam, O. A. (2005).Prejudice and stereotype maintenance processes: Attention, attribution, and individuation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 89 607-622.
69. Smeesters, D., Warlop, L., Van Avermaet, E., Corneille, O., and Yzerbyt, V. Y. (2003).Do not prime hawks with doves: The interplay of construct activation and consistency of social value orientation on cooperative behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 84 972-987.
70. Smeesters, D., Yzerbyt, V., Corneille, O., Warlop, L., and Van Avermaet, E. (2006).On prisoners and dictators: The role of other-self focus, social value orientation, and stereotype primes in shaping cooperative behavior Manuscript submitted for publication.
71. Spears, R., and Lea, M. (1994).Panacea or panopticon: The hidden power in computermediated communication. Communication Research 21 427-459.
72. Stangor, C., Sechrist, G. B., and Jost, J. T. (2001).Changing racial beliefs by providing consensus information. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 27 486-496.
73. Stephan, W. G., and Stephan, C. W. (1985).Intergroup anxiety. Journal of Social Issues 41 157-175.
74. Tajfel, H., and Turner, J. C. (1979).An integrative theory of intergroup relations, in W. G. Austin and S. Worchel (Eds), The psychology of intergroup relations Monterey CA:Brooks-Cole.
75. Tetlock, P. E., Armor, D., and Peterson, R. S. (1994).The slavery debate in antebellum America: Cognitive style, value conflict, and the limits of compromise. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 66 115-126.
76. Tetlock, P. E., and Lerner, J. F. (1999).The social contingency model: Identifying empirical and normative boundary conditions on the error-and-bias portrait of human nature. In Y. Trope (Ed.), Dual-process theories in social psychology 571-585
77. Tetlock, P. E., Skitka L., and Boettger, R. (1989).Social and cognitive strategies for coping with accountability: Conformity, complexity and bolstering. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 57 632-640.
78. Turner, J. C. (1991).Social influence Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
79. Weber, R., and Crocker, J. (1983).Cognitive processes in the revision of stereotypic beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 45 961-977.
80. Wilder, D. A. (1986).Intergroup contact: The typical member and the exception to the rule. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 20 177-194.
81. Wittenbrink, B., and Henly, J. R. (1996).Creating social reality: Informational social influence and the content of stereotypic beliefs. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 22 598-610.
82. Yzerbyt, V. Y. (2006).From subtle cues to profound influences: The impact of changing identities on emotions and behaviors. In P. A. M. van Lange (Ed.), Bridging social psychology:Benefits of transdisciplinary approaches, 391-396 Mahwah: Erlbaum
83. Yzerbyt, V. Y., and Carnaghi, A. (2005).Social consensus and the maintenance of stereotypic beliefs: Knowing whom you’ll talk to affects what you do with the information Manuscript submitted for publication
84. Yzerbyt, V. Y., and Corneille, O. (2005).Cognitive process: Reality constraints and integrity concerns in social perception. Catholic University of Louvain at Louvainla-Neuve, Belgium. In J. F. Dovidio, P. Glick, and L. Rudman (Eds.), On the nature of prejudice: 50 years after Allport London, UK: Blackwell.
85. Yzerbyt, V. Y., Coull, A., and Rocher, S. J. (1999).Fencing off the deviant: the role of cognitive resources in the maintenance of stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 77 449-62.
86. Yzerbyt, V. Y., Dumont, M., Mathieu, B., Gordijn, E., and Wigboldus, D. (2006). Social comparison and group-based emotions. In S. Guimond (Ed.), Social comparison processes and levels of analysis: Understanding cognition, intergroup relations, and culture (pp. 174-205). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
87. Yzerbyt, V. Y., Dumont, M., Wigboldus, D., and Gordijn, E. (2003).I feel for us: The impact of categorization and identification on emotions and action tendencies. British Journal of Social Psychology 42 533-549.
88. Zajonc, R. B. (1960).The process of cognitive tuning in communication. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 61 159-167.