How to support learning from multiple hypertext sources

Behavior Research Methods

Volumn 41, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 639-646

  Naumann, Anja B ^a   Wechsung, Ina ^a   Krems, Josef F ^b  

^a TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

^b CHEMNITZ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMAN; HYPERMEDIA; INSTRUMENTATION; INTERNET; LEARNING; METHODOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMANS; HYPERMEDIA; INTERNET; LEARNING; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE;

EID: 68949183448     PISSN: 1554351X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BRM.41.3.639     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Britt, M. A., Perfetti, C. A., Sandak, R., & Rouet, J.-F. (1999). Content integration and source separation in learning from multiple texts. In S. R. Goldman, A. C. Graesser, & P. van den Broek (Eds.), Narrative comprehension, causality, and coherence: Essays in honor of Tom Trabasso (pp. 209-233). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. Brunstein, A., Naumann, A. [B.], & Krems, J. F. (2005). The Chemnitz LogAnalyzer: A tool for analyzing data from hypertext navigation research. Behavior Research Methods, 37, 232-239.
3. Conklin, J. (1987). Hypertext: An introduction and survey. Computer, 20, 17-41. doi:10.1109/MC.1987.1663693
4. Einstein, G. O., McDaniel, M. A., Owen, P. D., & Coté, N. C. (1990). Encoding and recall of texts: The importance of material appropriate processing. Journal of Memory & Language, 29, 566-581. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(90)90052-2
5. Goldman, S. R. (2004). Cognitive aspects of constructing meaning through and across multiple texts. In N. Shuart-Faris & D. Bloome (Eds.), Uses of intertextuality in classroom and educational research (pp. 317-351). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
6. Graesser, A. C., Millis, K. K., & Zwaan, R. A. (1997). Discourse comprehension. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 163-189. doi:10.1146/ annurev.psych.48.1.163
7. Hemmerich, J., & Wiley, J. (2002). Do argumentation tasks promote conceptual change about volcanoes? In Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 453-458). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
9. Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
10. Kubinger, K. D. (1986). A note on non-parametric tests for the interaction in two-way layouts. Biometrical Journal, 28, 67-72. doi:10.1002/ bimj.4710280113
11. McDonald, S., & Stevenson, R. J. (1998). Effects of text structure and prior knowledge of the learner on navigation in hypertext. Human Factors, 40, 18-27. doi:10.1518/001872098779480541
12. McNamara, D. S., Kintsch, E., Songer, N. B., & Kintsch, W. (1996). Are good texts always better? Interactions of text coherence, background knowledge, and levels of understanding in learning from text. Cognition & Instruction, 14, 1-43. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci1401_1
13. Naumann, A. [B.] (2003). Wissenserwerb und Informationssuche mit Hypertexten: Die Bedeutung von Strukturierung, Navigationshilfen und Arbeitsgedächtnisbelastung [Knowledge acquisition and information retrieval with hypertext: The impact of structure, navigation aids, and working memory load]. Unpublished dissertation, TU Chemnitz. http://archiv.tu-chemnitz.de/pub/2004/0117.
14. Naumann, A. [B.], Brunstein, A., & Krems, J. F. (2007). DEWEX: A system for designing and conducting Web-based experiments. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 248-258.
15. Naumann, A. [B.], Waniek, J., & Krems, J. F. (2001). Knowledge acquisition, navigation and eye movements from text and hypertext. In U.-D. Reips & M. Bosnjak (Eds.), Dimensions of Internet science (pp. 293-304). Lengerich: Pabst Science.
16. Pasch, R., Brauße, U., Breindl, E., & Waßner, U. H. (2003). Hand-buch der deutschen Konnektoren [Handbook of connectors in the Ger-man language]. Berlin: de Gruyter.
17. Perfetti, C. A., Britt, M. A., & Georgi, M. C. (1995). Text-based learning and reasoning: Studies in history. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. Perfetti, C. A., Rouet, J.-F., & Britt, M. A. (1999). Toward a theory of documents representation. In H. van Oostendorp & S. R. Goldman (Eds.), The construction of mental representations during reading (pp. 99-122). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
19. Rouet, J.-F., Britt, M. A., Mason, R. A., & Perfetti, C. A. (1996). Using multiple sources of evidence to reason about history. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 478-493. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.88.3.478
20. Rouet, J.-F., Favart, M., Britt, M. A., & Perfetti, C. A. (1997). Studying and using multiple documents in history: Effects of discipline expertise. Cognition & Instruction, 15, 85-106. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci1501_3
21. Singer, M., Graesser, A. C., & Trabasso, T. (1994). Minimal or global inference during reading. Journal of Memory & Language, 33, 421-441. doi:10.1006/jmla.1994.1020
22. Stadtler, M., & Bromme, R. (2005). Dealing with multiple documents on the WWW: The role of metacognition in the formation of documents models. In B. G. Bara, L. Barsalou, & M. Bucciarelli (Eds.), Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2068-2073). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
23. Stahl, S. A., Hynd, C. R., Britton, B. K., McNish, M. M., & Bosquet, D. (1996). What happens when students read multiple source documents in history? Reading Research Quarterly, 31, 430-456. doi:10.1598/RRQ.31.4.5
24. VanSledright, B. [A.] (2002). In search of America's past: Learning to read history in elementary school. New York: Columbia University, Teachers College Press.
25. Voss, J. F., & Wiley, J. (2000). A case study of developing historical understanding via instruction: The importance of integrating text components and constructing arguments. In P. N. Stearns, P. Seixas, & S. Wineburg (Eds.), Knowing, teaching, and learning history: National and international perspectives (pp. 375-389). New York: New York University Press.
26. Wiley, J. (2001). Supporting understanding through task and browser design. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Third Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1136-1143). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
27. Wiley, J., & Voss, J. F. (1999). Constructing arguments from multiple sources: Tasks that promote understanding and not just memory for text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 301-311. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.91.2.301
28. Wineburg, S. S. (1994). The cognitive representation of historical texts. In G. Leinhardt, I. L. Beck, & C. Stainton (Eds.), Teaching and learning in history (pp. 85-135). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
29. Wineburg, S. [S.] (2000). Making historical sense. In P. N. Stearns, P. Seixas, & S. Wineburg (Eds.), Knowing, teaching, and learning history: National and international perspectives (pp. 306-325). New York: New York University Press.
30. Zwaan, R. A., & Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 162-185. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.123.2.162