New algorithms assessing short summaries in expository texts using latent semantic analysis

Behavior Research Methods

Volumn 41, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 944-950

  Olmos, Ricardo ^a   León, José A ^a   Jorge Botana, Guillermo ^a   Escudero, Inmaculada ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPREHENSION; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; READING; SEMANTICS; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ALGORITHMS; BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; COMPREHENSION; HUMANS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; READING; SEMANTICS;

EID: 68949181858     PISSN: 1554351X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BRM.41.3.944     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Deerwester, S., Dumais, S. T., Furnas, G. W., Landauer, T. K., & Harshman, R. (1990). Indexing by latent semantic analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41, 391-407.
2. Denhière, G., Lemaire, B., Bellissens, C., & Jhean-Larose, S. (2007). A semantic space modeling children's semantic memory. In T. K. Landauer, D. McNamara, S. Dennis, & W. Kintsch (Eds.), The handbook of latent semantic analysis (pp. 143-167). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
3. Foltz, P. W. (1996). Latent semantic analysis for text-based research. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 28, 197-202.
4. Hu, X., Cai, Z., Wiemer-Hastings, P., Graesser, A. C., & McNamara, D. S. (2007). Strengths, limitations, and extensions of LSA. In T. K. Landauer, D. S. McNamara, S. Dennis, & W. Kintsch (Eds.), The handbook of latent semantic analysis (pp. 401-426). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. Jorge-Botana, G., Olmos, R., & León, J. A. (in press). Using LSA and predication algorithm to improve sense extraction in a diagnosis Spanish corpus. Spanish Journal of Psychology.
6. Kintsch, E., Steinhart, D., Stahl, G., & LSA Research Group (2000). Developing summarization skills through the use of LSA-based feedback. Interactive Learning Environments, 8, 87-109.
7. Kintsch, W. (2000). Metaphor comprehension: A computational theory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 257-266.
8. Kintsch, W. (2001). Predication. Cognitive Science, 25, 173-202.
9. Kintsch, W. (2002). On the notions of theme and topic in psychological process models of text comprehension. In M. Louwerse & W. van Peer (Eds.), Thematics: Interdisciplinary studies (pp. 157-170). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
10. Kintsch, W. (2007). Meaning in context. In T. K. Landauer, D. S. McNamara, S. Dennis, & W. Kintsch (Eds.) The handbook of latent semantic analysis (pp. 89-105). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. Kintsch, W. (2008). Symbol systems and perceptual representations. In M. de Vega, A. M. Glenberg, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Symbols and embodiment: Debates on meaning and cognition (pp. 145-164). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12. Kintsch, W., & Bowles, A. R. (2002). Metaphor comprehension: What makes a metaphor difficult to understand? Metaphor & Symbol, 17, 249-262.
13. Landauer, T. K. (1998). Learning and representing verbal meaning: The latent semantic analysis theory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 7, 161-164.
14. Landauer, T. K., & Dumais, S. T. (1997). A solution to Plato's problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of the acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104, 211-240.
15. Landauer, T. K., Foltz, P. W., & Laham, D. (1998). An introduction to latent semantic analysis. Discourse Processes, 25, 259-284.
16. Landauer, T. K., Laham, D., & Foltz, P. W. (1998). Computer-based grading of the conceptual content of essays. Unpublished manuscript.
17. León, J. A., Olmos, R., Escudero, I., Cañas, J. J., & Salmerón, L. (2006). Assessing short summaries with human judgments procedure and latent semantic analysis in narrative and expository texts. Behavior Research Methods, 38, 616-627.
18. León, J. A., & The Reading Literacy Research Group (2004). La competencia lectora y los procesos de comprensión: Un proyecto de investigación basado en la evaluación de los tipos de comprensión [Reading literacy and reading processes: A research project on assessment of types of comprehension]. Unpublished manuscript.
19. McNamara, D., Boonthum, C., Levinstein, I., & Millis, K. K. (2007). Evaluating self-explanations in iSTART: Comparing word-based and LSA algorithms. In T. K. Landauer, D. S. McNamara, S. Dennis, & W. Kintsch (Eds.), The handbook of latent semantic analysis (pp. 227-241). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
20. Quesada, J. F., Kintsch, W., & Gómez, E. (2005). Latent problem solving analysis (LPSA): A theory of representation in complex problem solving. Manuscript submitted for publication.
21. Rehder, B., Schreiner, M. E., Wolfe, B. W., Laham, D., Kintsch, W., & Landauer, T. K. (1998). Using latent semantic analysis to assess knowledge: Some technical considerations. Discourse Processes, 25, 337-354.
22. Wade-Stein, D., & Kintsch, E. (2004). Summary street: Interactive computer support for writing. Cognition & Instruction, 22, 333-362.
23. Wiemer-Hastings, P., Wiemer-Hastings, K., & Graesser, A. (1999). How latent is latent semantic analysis? In Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Joint Congress on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 932-937). San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.
24. Wild, F., Stahl, C., Stermsek, G., & Neumann, G. (2005). Parameters driving effectiveness of automated essay scoring with LSA. In M. Danson (Ed.), Proceedings of the 9th International Computer Assisted Assessment Conference (pp. 485-494), Loughborough, U.K.: University of Loughborough.