Impoverished women with children and no welfare benefits: The urgency of researching failures of the temporary assistance for needy families program

American Journal of Public Health

Volumn 99, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 793-801

  Hildebrandt, Eugenie ^a   Stevens, Patricia ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHILD CARE; CHILD HEALTH; CHILD WELFARE; GOVERNMENT; HEALTH DISPARITY; HEALTH PROGRAM; HEALTH SURVEY; LOWEST INCOME GROUP; MATERNAL WELFARE; MEDICAL CARE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POVERTY; PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE; REVIEW;

CHILD; CHILD WELFARE; FAMILY; FAMILY HEALTH; FEMALE; GOVERNMENT PROGRAMS; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMANS; INCOME; POVERTY; PROGRAM EVALUATION; SOCIAL WELFARE; TIME FACTORS; UNITED STATES; WOMEN'S HEALTH SERVICES;

EID: 68949092243     PISSN: 00900036     EISSN: 15410048     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2006.106211     Document Type: Review

References (126)

1. Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act, Pub L No. 104-193 (1996).
2. Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, Pub L No. 109-171 (2006).
3. Administration for Children and Families. Caseload Data 2000-2007. Washington, DC: Dept of Health and Human Services; 2008:1.
4. Acs G, Loprest P. Final Report: TANF Caseload Composition and Leavers Synthesis Report. Washington, DC: Urban Institute; March 28, 2007.
5. Farrell M, Rich S, Turner L, Seith D, Bloom D. Welfare Time Limits: An Update on State Policies, Implementation, and Effects on Families. New York, NY: Manpower Demonstration Research Group; April 2008.
6. Anderson SG, Halter AP, Gryzlak BM. Difficulties after leaving TANF: inner-city women talk about reasons for returning to welfare. Soc Work. 2004;49(2):185-194.
7. Chavkin W, Wise P. The data are in: health matters in welfare policy. Am J Public Health. 2002;92(9):1392-1395.
8. Smith L, Romero D, Wood P, Wampler N, Chavkin W, Wise P. Employment barriers among welfare recipients and applicants with chronically ill children. Am J Public Health. 2002;92(9):1453-1457.
9. Cherlin A. The consequences of welfare reform for child well-being: what have we learned so far and what are the policy implications? Paper presented at: Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association; August 2004; San Francisco, CA.
10. Hildebrandt E. Health of women who dropped from sight when welfare became workfare. Paper presented at: 26th Annual Research Conference of the Midwest Nursing Research Society; March 2, 2002; Chicago, IL.
11. Hildebrandt E, Kelber ST. Perceptions of health and well-being among women in a work-based welfare program. Public Health Nurs. 2005;22(6):506-514.
12. Kneipp S. The health of women in transition from welfare to employment. West J Nurs Res. 2000;22(6):656-674 (discussion, 674-682).
13. Indicators of Welfare Dependence: Annual Report to Congress. Washington, DC: US Dept of Health and Human Services; 1998.
14. Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) Program, Second Annual Report to Congress. Washington, DC: US Dept of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation; August 1999.
15. Wiseman M. In the Midst of Reform: Wisconsin in 1997. Washington, DC: Urban Institute; June 1999.
16. Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF). Seventh Annual Report to Congress. Washington, DC: US Dept of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families; December 6, 2006.
17. Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Public health puzzlesocial determinants of health. Chronic Disease Notes & Reports. 2002;15(2):1-6.
18. Mechanic D. Disadvantage, inequality, and social policy. Major initiatives intended to improve population health may also increase health disparities. Health Aff. 2002;21(2):48-59.
19. Progress and Promise in Research on Social and Cultural Dimensions of Health: A Research Agenda. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health, Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research; 2001. NIH publication 01-5020.
20. van Ryn M, Fu S. Paved with good intentions: do public health and human service providers contribute to racial/ethnic disparities in health? Am J Public Health. 2003;93(2):248-255.
21. Handler A, Michele I, Turnock B. A conceptual framework to measure performance of the public health system. Am J Public Health. 2001;91(8):1235-1239.
22. Isaacs JB, Lyon MRA. Findings from the APSE-funded leavers studies. Paper presented at: National Association for Welfare Research and Statistics 40th Annual Workshop; August 1, 2000; Scottsdale, AZ.
23. Acs G, Loprest P, Roberts T. Final Synthesis Report of Finding From ASPE "Leavers" Grants. Washington, DC: Urban Institute; 2001.
24. Blank RM. Improving the safety net for single mothers who face serious barriers to work. Future Child. 2007;17(2):183-197.
25. Moffitt R, Cherlin A, Burton A, King M, Roff J. The Characteristics of Families Remaining on Welfare. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University; 2002. Welfare, Children and Families Policy Brief 02-02.
26. Pavetti L, Kauff J. When Five Years Is Not Enough: Identifying and Addressing the Needs of Families Nearing the TANF Time Limit in Ramsey County, Minnesota. Washington, DC: Mathematica Policy Research Inc; March 2006.
27. Seefeldt KS. After PRWORA: barriers to employment, work, and well-being among current and former welfare recipients. Poverty Research Insights. Fall 2004:1-7.
28. Turner LJ, Danziger S, Seefeldt KS. Failing the transition from welfare to work: women chronically disconnected from employment and cash welfare. Soc Sci Q. 2006;87(2):227-249.
29. Loprest P, Holcomb PA, Martinson K, Zedlewski S. TANF Policies for the Hard to Employ: Understanding State Approaches and Future Directions. Washington, DC: Urban Institute; July 2007.
30. Cherlin A, Frogner B, Ribar D, Moffit R. Welfare Reform in the mid-2000s: how African American and Hispanic families in three cities are faring. Paper presented at: Conference "The Moynihan Report Revisited: Lessons and Reflections After Four Decades"; September 28, 2007; Cambridge, MA.
31. Kindig D, Stoddart G. What is population health? Am J Public Health. 2003;93(3):380-383.
32. Parrott S, Schott L, Sweeney E. Implementing the TANF Changes in the Deficit Reduction Act: "Win-Win" Solution for Families and States. Washington, DC: Center for Law and Social Policy; August 7, 2007.
33. The 2009 HHS Poverty Guidelines.Washington, DC: US Dept of Health and Human Services; 2009.
34. Poverty status in the past 12 months. 2006 American Community Survey [on-line database]. Washington, DC: US Bureau of the Census.
35. DeNavas-Walt C, Proctor B, Hill C. Income, Poverty and Health Insurance Coverage in the United States: 2005. Washington, DC: US Dept of Commerce, Economic and Statistics Administration; August 2006. Current Population Reports.
36. Parisi D, McLaughlin DK, Grice SM, Taquino M. Exiting TANF: individual and local factors and their differential influence across racial groups. Soc Sci Q. 2006;87(1):76-90.
37. Carney P. The concept of poverty. Public Health Nurs. 1992;9(2):74-80.
38. Moss N. Socioeconomic disparities in health in the US: an agenda for action. Soc Sci Med. 2000;51(11):1627-1638.
39. Holzer HJ, Schanzenbach D, Duncan GJ, Ludwig J. The Economic Costs of Poverty in the United States: Subsequent Effects of Children Growing Up Poor. Washington, DC: Center for American Progress; January 24, 2007.
40. Hastings J, Taylor S, Austin MJ. The status of low-income families in the post-welfare reform environment: mapping the relationships between poverty and family. J Health Soc Policy. 2005;21(1):33-63.
41. Blank RM. Evaluating welfare reform in the United States. J Econ Lit. 2002;40(4):1105-1166.
42. Holzer H. Do We Need a Stronger Welfare Policy for a Weaker Economy? Short Takes on Welfare Policy. Washington, DC: Urban Institute; April 2002.
43. Chapman J, Bernstein J. Falling Through the Safety Net: Low-Income Single Mothers in the Jobless Recovery. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute; 2003. Issue Brief No. 191.
44. Isaacs JB. Receipt of Unemployment Insurance Among Low-Income Single Mothers. Washington, DC: Dept of Health and Human Services, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, Policy Information Center; January 2005.
45. Rangarajan A, Razafindrakoto C. Unemployment Insurance as a Potential Safety Net for TANF Leavers: Evidence From Five States.Washington, DC: Mathematical Policy Research Inc; 2004.
46. Zimmermann W, Tumlin KC. Patchwork Policies: State Assistance for Immigrants Under Welfare Reform. Washington, DC: Urban Institute; April 1, 1999.
47. Kaushal N, Kaestner R. Welfare reform and health of immigrant women and their children. J Immigr Minor Health. 2007;9(2):61-74.
48. Kullgren JT. Restrictions on undocumented immigrants' access to health services: the public health implications of welfare reform. Am J Public Health. 2003;93(10):1630-1633.
49. Bok M, Simmons L. Pathways out of poverty: the challenge of welfare policy. Soc Policy J. 2004;3(1):3-22.
50. Indicators of Welfare Dependence Annual Report to Congress, 2001: Executive Summary.Washington, DC: US Dept of Health and Human Services; 2001.
51. Pavetti L, Acs G. Moving up, moving out, or going nowhere? A study of the employment patterns of young women and the implications for welfare mothers. J Policy Anal Manage. 2001;20(4):721-736.
52. Hamilton G, Freedman S, Gennetian L, et al. How Effective Are Different Welfare-to-Work Approaches? Five-Year Adult and Child Impacts for Eleven Programs. Washington, DC: US Dept of Health and Human Services; 2001.
53. Michalopoulos C, Edin K, Fink B, et al. Welfare Reform in Philadelphia: Implementation, Effects, Experiences of Poor Families and Neighborhoods. New York, NY: Manpower Demonstration and Research Corporation; 2003.
54. Scott E, Edin K, London A, Kissane R. Welfare recipients struggle to balance work and family. Poverty Res News. 2002;6(4):12-15.
55. Fraker T, Levy DM, Perez-Johnson I, et al. The National Evaluation of the Welfare-to-Work Grants Program: Final Report. Washington, DC: Mathematica Policy Research Inc; September 2004.
56. Wood RG, Moore Q, Rangarajan A. Two steps forward, one step back: the uneven economic progress of TANF recipients. Soc Serv Rev. 2008;82(1):3-28.
57. Dodson L, Manuel T, Bravo E. Keeping Jobs and Raising Families in Low-Income America: It Just Doesn't Work. Cambridge, MA: Radcliffe Institute for Advance Study, Harvard University; 2002.
58. Wise P, Wampler N, Chavkin W, Romero D. Chronic illness among poor children enrolled in the temporary assistance for needy families program. Am J Public Health. 2002;92(9):1458-1461.
59. Romero D, Chavkin W, Wise P, Smith L, Wood P. Welfare to work? Impact of maternal health on employment. Am J Public Health. 2002;92(9):1462-1468.
60. Anderson S, Gryzlak B. Social work advocacy in the post-TANF environment: lessons from early TANF research studies. Soc Work. 2002;47(3):301-314.
61. Lens V. TANF: what went wrong and what to do next. Soc Work. 2002;47(3):279-290.
62. Courtney ME, Dworsky A. Those Left Behind: Enduring Challenges Facing Welfare Applicants. Chicago, IL: Chapin Hall Center for Children; May 2006.
63. Danziger S, Corcoran M, Danziger S, et al. Barriers to the employment of welfare recipients. In: Cherry R, Rodgers W, eds. Prosperity for All? The Economic Boom and African Americans. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation; 2000:245-278.
64. Crichton L. The Welfare Time Limit in Minnesota: A Survey of Families Who Lost MFIP Eligibility as a Result of the Five-Year Time Limit. St Paul: Minnesota Dept of Human Services; July 2003.
65. Joblessness and Urban Poverty Research Program. After Welfare Reform: A Snapshot of Low-Income Families in Boston. Boston, MA: Wiener Center for Social Policy, Kennedy School of Government; 2004:1-16.
66. Loprest P. Who Returns to Welfare? Washington, DC: Urban Institute; 2002.
67. Loprest P. Families Who Left Welfare: Who Are They and How Are They Doing? Assessing the New Federalism: An Urban Institute Program to Assess Changing Social Policies. Washington, DC: Urban Institute; July 1999.
68. Cherlin A, Bogen K, Quane J, Burton L. Operating within the rules: welfare recipients' experiences with sanctions and case closing. Soc Sci Rev. 2002;76(3):387-405.
69. Lens V. Welfare and work sanctions: examining discretion on the front lines. Soc Serv Rev. 2008;82(2):197-222.
70. Lindhorst T, Mancoske RJ. The social and economic impact of sanctions and time limits on recipients of Temporary Assistance to Needy Families. J Sociol Soc Welf. 2006;33(1):93-114.
71. Pavetti L, Derr MK, Hesketh H. Review of Sanction Policies and Research Studies: Final Literature Review. Washington, DC: Mathematica Policy Research Inc; March 10, 2003.
72. Loprest P, Zedlewski S. The Changing Role of Welfare in the Lives of Low-Income Families With Children. Washington, DC: Urban Institute; August 2006.
73. Loprest P. Disconnected Welfare Leavers Face Serious Risks. Washington, DC: Urban Institute; 2003. Report No. 7.
74. Wood RG, Rangarajan A. What's Happening to TANF Leavers Who Are Not Employed? Washington, DC: Mathematica Policy Research Inc; October 2003.
75. Loprest P, Holcomb PA, Martinson K, Zedlewski S. TANF Policies for the Hard to Employ: Understanding State Approaches and Future Directions. Washington, DC: Urban Institute; July 2007.
76. Baider A, Frank A. Transitional Jobs: Helping TANF Recipients With Barriers to Employment Succeed in the Labor Market. Washington, DC: Center for Law and Social Policy; May 23, 2006.
77. Golden O,Winston P, Acs G, Chaudry A. Framework for a New Safety Net for Low-Income Families: Paper 7. Washington, DC: Urban Institute; 2007.
78. Zedlewski S, Holcomb P, Loprest P. Hard-to-Employ Parents: A Review of Their Characteristics and the Programs Designed to Serve Their Needs. Washington, DC: Urban Institute; June 2007.
79. Hetling A, Patterson K, Born C. The TANF Time Limit: Comparing Long-Term and Other Welfare Leavers. Baltimore, MD: Family Welfare Research Training Group; 2006.
80. Moffitt R, Winder K. The Correlates and Consequences of Welfare Exit and Entry: Evidence for the Three-City Study. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press; 2003. Three-City Working Paper 03-01.
81. Nelson S, Zedlewski S, Edin K. Qualitative Interviews With Families Reporting No Work or Government Cash Assistance in the National Survey of America's Families. Washington, DC: Urban Institute; 2003.
82. Perkins D. Improving employment participation for welfare recipients facing personal barriers. Social Policy Soc. 2007;7(1):13-26.
83. Mann C, Hudman J, Salganicoff A, Folsom A. Five years later: poor women's health care coverage after welfare reform. J Am Med Women's Assoc. 2002;57(1):16-22.
84. Grady A. CRS Report for Congress: Transitional Medical Assistance (TMA) Under Medicaid. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Services; 2008.
85. Wolfe B, Kaplan T, Haveman R, Cho Y. SCHIP expansion and parental coverage: an evaluation of Wisconsin's BadgerCare. J Health Econ. 2006;25(6):1170-1192.
86. Haskins R, Sawhill I. Introducing the issue. Future Child. 2007;17(2):3-16.
87. Guyer J. Health Care After Welfare: An Update of Findings From State-Level Leaver Studies. Washington, DC: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities; 2000.
88. Holl JL, Slack KS, Stevens AB. Welfare reform and health insurance: consequences for parents. Am J Public Health. 2005;95(2):279-285.
89. Polit D, London A, Martinez J. The Health of Poor Urban Women: Findings From the Project on Devolution and Urban Change. New York, NY: Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation; May 2001.
90. Cheng T. Leaving Medicaid without health insurance: TANF policies and recipients' vulnerabilities. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2007;18(3):609-619.
91. Seccombe K, Newsom J, Hoffman K. Access to health care after welfare reform. Inquiry. 2006;43(2):167-178.
92. Seccombe K, Hartley H, Newsom J, et al. The aftermath of welfare reform. J Fam Issues. 2007;28(2):151-181.
93. Healthy People 2010. Conference ed, 2 vol. Washington, DC: US Dept of Health and Human Services; January 2000.
94. Braveman P, Gruskin S. Defining equity in health. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2003;57(4):254-258.
95. Welfare, Women, and Health: The Role of Temporary Assistance for Needy Families. Menlo Park, CA: Kaiser Family Foundation; 2003. Report No. 3337.
96. Corcoran M, Danziger SK, Tolman R. Long term employment of African-American and white welfare recipients and the role of persistent health and mental health problems. Women Health. 2004;39(4):21-40.
97. Williams D. Racial/ethnic variations in women's health: the social embeddedness of health. Am J Public Health. 2002;92(4):588-597.
98. Wykoff R. The impact of socioeconomic status on health disparities in the United States. Ethn Dis. 2002;12(1):S2-13-S2-14.
99. Burton LM, Lein L, Kolak A. Health and mothers' employment in low income families. In: Bianchi S, Casper L, eds. Work, Family Health and Well-Being. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2005:493-509.
100. Crewe S. Motivated but fearful: welfare reform, disability, and race. J Health Soc Policy. 2002;16(1-2):55-68.
101. Earle A, Heymann S. What causes job loss among former welfare recipients: the role of family health problems. J Am Med Women's Assoc. 2002;57(1):5-10.
102. Hildebrandt E. The health effects of work-based welfare. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2002;34(4):363-368.
103. Horwitz S, Kerker B. Impediments to employment under welfare reform: the importance of physical health and psychosocial characteristics. Women Health. 2001;32(1-2):191-117.
104. Loprest P. How are families who left welfare doing over time? A comparison of two cohorts of welfare leavers. Econ Policy Rev. 2001;7(2):10.
105. Moffitt R, Cherlin A. Disadvantage Among Families Remaining on Welfare. Chicago, IL: Northwestern University/University of Chicago, Joint Center for Poverty Research; 2000.
106. Sweeney E. Recent Studies Indicate That Many ParentsWho Are Current or Former Welfare Recipients Have Disabilities or Other Medical Conditions. Washington, DC: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities; February 2000.
107. Loprest P, Zedlewski S, Schaner S. Mental Health, Work, and Mental Health Service Use Among Low-Income Mothers.Washington, DC: Urban Institute; August 2007.
108. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Revised Third Edition.Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 1987.
109. Jayakody R, Danziger S, Pollack H. Welfare reform, substance use, and mental health. J Health Polit Policy Law. 2000;25(4):623-651.
110. Para G. Welfare Reform and Substance Abuse: Innovative State Strategies. Washington, DC: George Washington University; 2002. National Health Policy Forum Issue Brief No. 771.
111. Montoya I, Atkinson J, Struse H. A comparison of psychosocial barriers among welfare recipients: implications for drug treatment. Subst Use Misuse. 2001;36(6-7):771-788.
112. Morgenstern J, Blanchard KA, McCrady BS, McVeigh KH, Morgan TJ, Pandina RJ. Effectiveness of intensive case management for substance-dependent women receiving temporary assistance for needy families. Am J Public Health. 2006;96(11):2016-2023.
113. Gutman M, McKay J, Ketterlinus R, McLellan A. Potential barriers to work for substance-abusing women on welfare. Eval Rev. 2003;27(6):681-706.
114. Welfare Reform: Outcome for TANF Recipients With Impairments. Washington, DC: US General Accounting Office; July 2002. Report GAO-02-884.
115. Welfare Reform: More Coordinated Federal Effort Could Help States and Localities Move TANF Recipients With Impairments Toward Employment. Washington, DC: US General Accounting Office; 2001. Report No. GAO-02-37.
116. Skinner D, Slattery E, Lachicotte W, Cherlin A, Burton L. Disability, Health Coverage, and Welfare Reform. Washington, DC: Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured; October 2002.
117. Dunifon R, Kalil A, Danziger S. Maternal work behavior under welfare reform: how does the transition from welfare to work affect child development? Child Youth Serv Rev. 2003;25(1-2):55-82.
118. Johnson RC, Kalil A, Dunifon RE. Work After Welfare Reform and the Well-Being of Children. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Gerald R. Ford School of Public Policy; August 2007.
119. Chase-Lansdale PL, Moffitt RA, Lohman BJ, et al. Mothers' transitions from welfare to work and the well-being of preschoolers and adolescents. Science. 2003;299(5612):1548-1552.
120. Moffitt R, Chase-Lansdale P, Cherlin A. Explaining Disparate Findings From the Three-City and the MDRC Next Generation Studies on the Employment and Welfare Impacts on Children and Adolescents. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University; 2004.
121. Hao L, Cherlin A. Welfare reform and teenage pregnancy, childbirth, and school dropout. J Marriage Fam. 2004;66(1):179-194.
122. Gennetian L, Duncan G, Knox V, Gargas W, Clark-Kauffman E, London A. How Welfare and Work Policies for Parents Affect Adolescents. A Synthesis of Research. New York, NY: Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation; 2002.
123. Morris P, Knox V, Gennetian L. Welfare Policies Matter for Children and Youth: Lessons for TANF Reauthorization. New York, NY: Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation; 2002.
124. Pawasarat J, Quinn L. Addressing Barriers to Employment: Increasing Child Care Rates and the Rate Setting Process Under the Wisconsin Shares Program. Milwaukee: Employment and Training Institute, School of Continuing Education, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee; May 2002.
125. Dodson L. After welfare reform: you choose your child over the job. Focus. 2006;24(3):25-28.
126. Loprest P. Use of Government Benefits Increases Among Families LeavingWelfare.Washington, DC: Urban Institute; 2003. Report No. 6.