Perceptions of health and well-being among women in a work-based welfare program

Public Health Nursing

Volumn 22, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 506-514

  Hildebrandt, Eugenie ^a   Kelber, Sheryl T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE   (United States)

Author keywords

Community health; Poverty; Primary health care; Vulnerable populations; Women

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROL; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; MENTAL HEALTH; MIDDLE AGED; POVERTY; SELF CONCEPT; SOCIAL CARE; UNITED STATES; VULNERABLE POPULATION; WOMEN'S HEALTH;

ADULT; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HUMANS; INTERNAL-EXTERNAL CONTROL; MENTAL HEALTH; MIDDLE AGED; MIDWESTERN UNITED STATES; POVERTY; PUBLIC ASSISTANCE; SELF CONCEPT; VULNERABLE POPULATIONS; WOMEN'S HEALTH;

EID: 30744450923     PISSN: 07371209     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0737-1209.2005.220606.x     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Anderson, G., Halter, A., & Gryzlak, B. (2004). Difficulties after leaving TANF: Inner-city women talk about reasons for returning to welfare. Social Work, 49(2), 85-91.
2. Burton, L. M., Lein, L., & Kolak, A. (2005). Health, and mothers' employment in low income families. In S. Bianchi, & L. Casper (Eds.), Work, family health and well-being (pp. 493-509). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
3. Cancian, M., & Meyer, D. (2000). Work after welfare: Women's work effort, occupation and economic wellbeing. Social Work Research, 24(2), 69-86.
4. Carney, P. (1992). The concept of poverty. Public Health Nursing, 9(2), 74-80.
5. Dodson, L., Manuel, T., & Bravo, E. (2002). Keeping jobs and raising families in low-income America: It just doesn't work. Radcliff Institute for Advanced Study. Cambridge: Harvard University.
6. Dupuy, H. (1977). A concurrent validation study of the NCHS general well-being schedule. In U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare (USDHEW) (pp. iii-iv). U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare. Publication No. (HRA) 78-1347. Washington, DC.
7. Dupuy, H. (1978, October). Self-representations of general psychological well-being of American adults. Unpublished paper presented at American Public Health Association meeting, Los Angeles.
8. Dupuy, H. (1984). The psychological general well-being (PGWB) index. In N. Wenger, M. Mattson, C. Furberg, & J. Elinson (Eds.), Assessment of quality life in clinical trials of cardiovascular therapies (pp. 170-183). New York: LeJacq.
9. Edwards, D., Yarvis, R., Mueller, D., Zingale, H., & Wagman, W. (1978). Test-taking and the stability of adjustment scales: Can we assess patient deterioration? Evaluation Quarterly, 2(2), 275-291.
10. Fazio, A. (1977). A concurrent validational study of the NCHS General Well-Being Schedule. In U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare (USDHEW) (pp. 1-53). U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare. Publication No. (HRA) 78-1347. Washington, DC.
11. Fergerson, G. (2001). Culture, class, and service delivery: The politics of welfare reform and an urban bioethics agenda. Journal of Urban Health: Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 78(1), 81-87.
12. Hildebrandt, E. (2002). The health effects of work-based welfare. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 34(4), 363-368.
13. Himmelfarb, S., & Murrell, S. (1983). Reliability and validity of five mental health scales in older persons. Journal of Gerontology, 38(3), 333-339.
14. Kneipp, S. (2000). The health of women in transition from welfare to employment. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 22(6), 656-674.
15. Lens, V. (2002). TANF: What went wrong and what to do next. Social Work, 47(3), 279-290.
16. Lerman, R. (2001, July). Jobs and wages up sharply for single moms, gains especially high after welfare reform. Single Parents' Earnings Monitor. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
17. Loprest, P. (1999). Families who left welfare: Who are they and how are they doing? Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
18. Olson, M., Muhammad, K., Rodgers, L., & Karim, M. (2000). Picture this: Images and realities in welfare to work. Affilia, 15(2), 329-344.
19. Pearlmutter, S., & Bartle, E. (2000). Supporting the move from welfare to work: What women say. Affilia, 15(2), 153-172.
20. Polit, D., & Hungler, B. (2001). Nursing research: Principles and methods (5th ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
21. Qualitative Solutions and Research (QSR). (1999). NVIVO. Australia: Melbourne.
22. Ragin, C. (1999). The distinctiveness of case-oriented research. Health Services Research, 34(5 Pt. 2), 1137-1151.
23. Richards, T., & Richards, L. (2003). The way ahead in qualitative computing. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 2(1), 16-26.
24. Romero, D., Chavkin, W., Wise, P., Smith, L., & Wood, P. (2002). Welfare to work? Impact of maternal health on employment. American Journal of Public Health, 92(9), 1462-1468.
25. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (USDHHS). (1999, August). Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program. Second annual report to Congress. Administration for Children and Families, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation. Washington, DC: Author.
26. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (USDHHS). (2000, January). Healthy People 2010 (Conference Edition, 2 vols.). Washington, DC: Author.
27. Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development [DWD]. (2001). Retrieved from http:// www.dwd.state.wi.us/dws/manuals/w-2-manual/ archives/default.htm
28. Wood, P., Smith, L., Romero, D., Bradshaw, P., Wise, P., & Chavkin, W. (2002). Relationships between welfare status, health insurance status, and health and medical care among children with asthma. American Journal of Public Health, 9(9), 1446-1452.