The health effects of work-based welfare

Journal of Nursing Scholarship

Volumn 34, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 363-368

  Hildebrandt, Eugenie ^a,b  

^a Eta Nu   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE   (United States)

Author keywords

Primary health care; Qualitative research; Welfare reform; Well being; Women's health

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MIDDLE AGED; SOCIAL SECURITY; SOCIAL WELFARE; UNITED STATES; URBAN POPULATION; WOMEN'S HEALTH;

ADULT; AID TO FAMILIES WITH DEPENDENT CHILDREN; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE REFORM; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS; MIDDLE AGED; SOCIAL WELFARE; URBAN POPULATION; WISCONSIN; WOMEN'S HEALTH; WOMEN, WORKING;

EID: 0036356958     PISSN: 15276546     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2002.00363.x     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Anderson, J. (1991). Reflexivity in fieldwork: Toward a feminist epistemology. Image: Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 23, 151-118.
2. Cancian, M., & Meyer, D. (2000). Work after welfare: Women's work effort, occupation, and economic well-being. Social Work Research, 24(2) 69-86.
3. Hall, J., & Stevens, P. (1991). Rigor in feminist research. Advanced Nursing Science, 13(3), 16-29.
4. Hildebrandt, E. (1996). Building community participation in health care: An example from South Africa. Image: Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 28, 155-159.
5. Horwitz, S., & Kerker, B. (2001). Impediments to employment under welfare reform: The importance of physical health and psychosocial characteristics. Women & Health, 32(1&2), 101-117.
6. Kneipp, S. (2000). The health of women in transition from welfare to employment. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 22(6), 656-74.
7. McDowell, I., & Newell, C. (1996). Measuring health. A guide to rating scales and questionnaires (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
8. Miles, M., & Huberman, M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9. Pawasarat, J., & Quinn, L. (1999). Impact of welfare reform on child care subsidies in Milwaukee county: 1996-1999. Milwaukee, WI: Employment and Training Institute, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
10. Pearlmutter, S., & Bartle, E. (2000). Supporting the move from welfare to work: What women say. Affilia, 15(2), 153-172.
11. Qualitative Solutions and Research. (1999). NVIVO [computer software]. Melbourne, Australia: Author.
12. Rifkin, S. (1996). Paradigms lost: Toward a new understanding of community participation in health programmes. Acta Tropica, 6, 79-92.
13. Stevens, P. (2000). A nursing critique of U.S. welfare system reform. Advances in Nursing Science, 23(2), 1-11.
14. Triplett, F. (1997). Project get started: Phase II report. Milwaukee, WI: Milwaukee Area Technical College.
15. U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare. (1977). A concurrent validational study of the NCHS general well-being schedule. DHEW Publication No. (HRA) 78-1347. Washington, DC: Author.
16. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2002). Indicators of welfare dependence, annual report to the Congress. Retrieved June 2002, from http://aspe.hhs.gov/hsp/indicators02/
17. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2000). Healthy people 2010. Washington, DC: Author.
18. Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development. (2002). Temporary assistance for needy families (TANF). Retrieved June 2002, from http://www.dwd.state.wi.us/dws/programs/tanf/
19. World Health Organization. (1978). Primary health care: Report of the International Conference on Primary Health Care, Alma Ata, USSR. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
20. World Health Organization. (1991). Community involvement in health development: Challenging health services. Report of a WHO Study Group. Technical Report Series, No. 809. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.