Perioperative assessment of volume status: Measurement of preload is not measurement of preload responsiveness

European Journal of Anaesthesiology

Volumn 26, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 269-271

  De Hert, Stefan G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BLOOD VOLUME; CARDIOPULMONARY HEMODYNAMICS; CENTRAL VENOUS PRESSURE; EDITORIAL; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE ENDDIASTOLIC VOLUME; HEART PRELOAD; HUMAN; PATIENT MONITORING; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; PULMONARY ARTERY OCCLUSION PRESSURE; TISSUE OXYGENATION; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE FUNCTION; HEART STROKE VOLUME; METHODOLOGY; MONITORING; NOTE; PHYSIOLOGY;

BLOOD VOLUME; HUMANS; MONITORING, PHYSIOLOGIC; PERIOPERATIVE CARE; STROKE VOLUME; VENTRICULAR FUNCTION, LEFT;

EID: 68849132305     PISSN: 02650215     EISSN: 13652346     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32831ffea2     Document Type: Editorial

References (24)

1. Bindels AJ, van der Hoeven JG, Grafland AD, et al. Relationships between volume and pressure measurements and stroke volume in critically ill patients. Crit Care 2000; 4:193-199.
2. Buhre W, Buhre K, Kazmeier S, et al. Assessment of cardiac preload by indicator dilution and transoesophageal echocardiography. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2001; 18:662-667.
3. Della Rocca G, Costa MG, Coccia C, et al. Preload and haemodynamic assessment during liver transplantation: a comparison between the pulmonary artery catheter and transpulmonary indicator dilution techniques. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2002; 19:868-875.
4. Kumar A, Anel B, Bunnell E, et al. Pulmonary artery occlusion pressure and central venous pressure fail to predict ventricular volume, cardiac performance, or the response to volume infusion in normal subjects. Crit Care Med 2004; 32:691-699.
5. Della Rocca G, Costa MG, Coccia C, et al. Continuous right ventricular end-diastolic volume: comparison with left ventricular end-diastolic area. Eur J Anaesthesiol (in press).
6. Chang MC, Black CS, Meredith CW. Volumetric assessment of preload in trauma patients: addressing the problem of mathematical coupling. Shock 1996; 6:326-329.
7. Nelson LD, Safcsak K, Cheatham ML, Block EFJ. Mathematical coupling does not explain the relationship between right ventricular end-diastolic volume and cardiac output. Crit Care Med 2001; 29:940-943.
8. Pinsky MR. Assessment of indices of preload and volume responsiveness. Curr Opin Crit Care 2005; 11:235-239.
9. Monnet X, Teboul JL. Invasive measures of left ventricular preload. Curr Opin Crit Care 2006; 12:235-240.
10. Michard F, Teboul JL. Predicting fluid responsiveness in ICU patients: a critical analysis of the evidence. Chest 2002; 121:2000-2008.
11. Reuter DA, Felbinger TW, Schmidt C, et al. Stroke volume variations for assessment of cardiac responsiveness to volume loading in mechanically ventilated patients after cardiac surgery. Intensive Care Med 2002; 28:392-398.
12. Bendjelid K, Romand JA. Fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: a review of indices used in intensive care medicine. Intensive Care Med 2003; 29:352-360.
13. Reuter DA, Bayerlein J, Goepfert MS, et al. Influence of tidal volume on left ventricular stroke volume variation measured by pulse contour analysis in mechanically ventilated patients. Intensive Care Med 2003; 29:476-480.
14. Kramer A, Zygun D, Hawes H, et al. Pulse pressure variation predicts fluid responsiveness following coronary artery bypass surgery. Chest 2004; 126:1563-1568.
15. Vieillard-Baron A, Chergui K, Rabiller A, et al. Superior vein collapsibility as a gauge of volume status in ventilated septic patients. Intensive Care Med 2004; 30:1734-1739. (Pubitemid 39297176)
16. De Backer D, Heenen S, Piagnerelli M, et al. Pulse pressure variations to predict fluid responsiveness: influence of tidal volume. Intensive Care Med 2005; 31 :517-523.
17. Monnet X, Rienzo M, Osman D, et al. Esophageal Doppler monitoring predicts fluid responsiveness in critically ill ventilated patients. Intensive Care Med 2005; 31 :1195-1201.
18. Preisman S, Kogan S, Berkenstadt H, Perel A. Predicting fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: functional haemodynamic parameters including the respiratory systolic variation test and static preload indicators. Br J Anaesth 2005; 95:746-755.
19. De Hert SG, Gillebert TC, ten Broecke PW, et al. Contraction-relaxation coupling and impaired left ventricular performance in coronary surgery patients. Anesthesiology 1999; 90:748-757.
20. De Hert SG, Gillebert TC, ten Broecke PW, Moulijn AC. Length-dependent regulation of left ventricular function in coronary surgery patients. Anesthesiology 1999; 91 :379-387.
21. De Hert SG, Van der Linden PJ, ten Broecke PW, et al. Assessment of length-dependent regulation of myocardial function in coronary surgery patients using transmitral flow velocity patterns. Anesthesiology 2000; 93:374-381.
22. Monnet X, Rienzo M, Osman D, et al. Passive leg raising predicts fluid responsiveness in the critically ill. Crit Care Med 2006; 34:1402-1407.
23. max. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2006; 20:325-330.
24. Pinsky MR, Payen D. Functional hemodynamic monitoring. Crit Care 2005; 9:566-572.