Desat1 and the evolution of pheromonal communication in drosophila

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Volumn 1170, Issue , 2009, Pages 502-505

  Bousquet, François ^a   Houot, Benjamin ^a   Chauvel, Isabelle ^a   Dupas, Stéphane ^a   Ferveur, Jean François ^a  

^a CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

Desat1; Desaturase; Drosophila; Pheromone; Sensory communication; Taste

Indexed keywords

DESAT1 PROTEIN; DROSOPHILA PROTEIN; SEX PHEROMONE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; GENE ACTIVITY; GENE CONTROL; GENE EXPRESSION; GENETIC CODE; GENETIC CONSERVATION; GENETIC LINKAGE; GENETIC TRANSCRIPTION; INSECT GENETICS; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; NONHUMAN; PLEIOTROPY; PROMOTER REGION; SEXUAL SELECTION; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; TISSUE SPECIFICITY;

DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER;

EID: 68649123367     PISSN: 00778923     EISSN: 17496632     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.03927.x     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. Bradbury, J.W. & S.L. Vehrencamp. 1998. Principles of Animal Communication. Sinauer. Sunderland, MA.
2. Darwin, C. 1883. The Descent of Man and Selection Relation to Sex, 3rd ed. Murray. London, UK.
3. Panhuis, T.M. et al. 2001. Sexual selection and speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16: 364-371.
4. Lande, R. 1981. Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA78: 3721-3725.
5. Hoy, R.R., J. Hahn & R.C. Paul. 1977. Hybrid cricket auditory behavior: evidence for genetic coupling in animal communication. Science 195: 82- 84.
6. Ryan, M.J. & W. Wilczyynski. 1988. Coevolution of sender and receiver: effects on local mate preference in cricket frogs. Science 240: 1786-1788.
7. Lofstedt, C. et al. 1989. No linkage between genes controlling female pheromone production and male pheromone response in the European corn borer, Ostrinia nubilalis Hubner (Lepidoptera; Pyralidae). Genetics 123: 553-556.
8. Ritchie, M.G. 2000. The inheritance of female preference functions in a mate recognition system. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 267: 327-332.
9. Boake,C. 1991. Coevolution of senders and receivers of sexual signals: genetic coupling and genetic correlations. Trends Ecol. Evol. 6: 225-227.
10. Wyatt, T.D. 2003. Pheromones and Animal Behaviour: Communication by Smell and Taste. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, UK.
11. Jallon J.-M. 1984. A few chemical words exchanged by Drosophila during courtship. Behav. Genet. 14:441-478.
12. Ferveur, J.-F. 2005. Cuticular hydrocarbons: evolution and role in the pheromonal communication of Drosophila. Behav. Genet. 35: 279-295.
13. Ferveur J. F. & G. Sureau. 1996. Simultaneous influence on male courtship of stimulatory and inhibitory pheromones produced by live sex-mosaic Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 263: 967- 973.
14. Coyne, J.A., A.P. Crittenden & K. Mah. 1994. Genetics of a pheromonal difference contributing to reproductive isolation in Drosophila. Science 265:1461-1464.
15. Coyne J.A. & R. Oyama. 1995. Localization of pheromonal sexual dimorphism in Drosophila melanogaster and its effect on sexual isolation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92: 9505-9509.
16. Savarit, F. et al. 1999. Genetic elimination of known pheromones reveals the fundamental chemical bases of mating and isolation in Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96: 9015-9020.
17. Stocker R.F. 1994. The organization of the chemosensory system in Drosophila melanogaster: a review. Cell Tissue Res. 275: 3-26.
18. Marcillac, F., Y. Grosjean & J.-F. Ferveur. 2005. A single mutation alters production and discrimination of Drosophila sex pheromones. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B272: 303-309.
19. Marcillac, F. et al. 2005.Amutation with major effects on Drosophila melanogaster sex pheromones. Genetics171: 1617-1628.
20. Marcillac, F., B. Houot & J.-F. Ferveur. 2005. Revisited roles of Drosophila females pheromones. Chem. Senses 30: 273-274.
21. Blows, M.W. & R.A. Allan. 1998. Levels of mate recognition within and between two Drosophila species and their hybrids. Am. Nat. 152: 826-837.
22. Blows, M.W. 1999. Evolution of the genetic covariance between male and female components of mate recognition: an experimental test. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B266: 2169-2174.
23. Chenoweth, S.F. & M.W. Blows. 2003. Signal trait sexual dimorphism and mutual sexual selection in Drosophila serrata. Evolution 57: 2326-2334.
24. Marcillac, F. & J.-F. Ferveur. 2004. A set of female pheromones affects reproduction before, during and after mating in Drosophila. J. Exp. Biol. 207: 3927- 3933.
25. Dallerac, R. et al. 2000. A delta 9 desaturase gene with a different substrate specificity is responsible for the cuticular diene hydrocarbon polymorphism in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA97: 9449-9454.
26. Takahashi, A. et al. 2001. The nucleotide changes governing cuticular hydrocarbon variation and their evolution in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98: 3920-3925.
27. Fang, S., A. Takahashi & C.I.Wu. 2002. A mutation in the promoter of desaturase 2 is correlated with sexual isolation between Drosophila behavioral races. Genetics 162: 781-784.
28. Roelofs, W.L. et al. 2002. Evolution of moth sex pheromones via ancestral genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99: 13621-13626.
29. Baker, T.C. 2002. Mechanism for saltational shifts in pheromone communication systems. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99: 13368-13370.