Ion-rejection, electrokinetic and electrochemical properties of a nanoporous track-etched membrane and their interpretation by means of space charge model

Langmuir

Volumn 25, Issue 16, 2009, Pages 9605-9614

  Yaroshchuk, Andriy ^a   Boiko, Yuriy ^b   Makovetskiy, Alexandre ^c  

^a UNIVERSITAT POLITÈCNICA DE CATALUNYA   (Spain)

^b INSTITUTE OF BIOCOLLOID CHEMISTRY   (Ukraine)

^c NATIONAL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF UKRAINE   (Ukraine)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BASIC CONCEPTS; CONCENTRATION OF; CYLINDRICAL PORES; ELECTRICAL MEASUREMENT; ELECTRICAL PHENOMENA; ELECTRICAL RESPONSE; ELECTROKINETIC; ELECTROLYTE SOLUTIONS; EXPERIMENTAL MEASUREMENTS; FILTRATION POTENTIAL; FITTING PARAMETERS; HYDRAULIC PERMEABILITY; MEMBRANE POTENTIALS; NANO CHANNELS; NANOPOROUS TRACK-ETCHED MEMBRANES; NON-LINEARITY; POLY(ETHYLENE TEREPHTHALATE); PORE DIAMETERS; PRESSURE SWITCHES; SALT REJECTIONS; SPACE CHARGE MODEL; STREAMING POTENTIAL; TIME RESOLVED MEASUREMENT; TRANSMEMBRANES; VOLUME FLOW;

CELL MEMBRANES; CHARGED PARTICLES; ELECTROCHEMICAL PROPERTIES; ELECTROLYTES; ETHYLENE; MEMBRANES; NANOFLUIDICS; POLYETHYLENE TEREPHTHALATES; POROUS MATERIALS; SURFACE CHARGE; TRANSPORT PROPERTIES;

MICROFILTRATION;

ION; NANOPARTICLE; POLYETHYLENE TEREPHTHALATE;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL MEMBRANE; CHEMISTRY; ELECTROCHEMISTRY; KINETICS; POROSITY;

ALGORITHMS; ELECTROCHEMISTRY; IONS; KINETICS; MEMBRANES, ARTIFICIAL; NANOPARTICLES; POLYETHYLENE TEREPHTHALATES; POROSITY;

EID: 68649098335     PISSN: 07437463     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/la900737q     Document Type: Article

References (84)

1. Eijkel, J. C. T.; van den Berg, A. Microfluidics & Nanofluidics 2005, 1, 249.
2. Pu, Q. S.; Yun, J. S.; Temkin, H.; Liu, S. R. Nano Lett. 2004, 4, 1099.
3. Datta, A.; Gangopadhyay, S.; Temkin, H.; Pu, Q.; Liu, S. Talanta 2006, 68, 659.
4. Huang, K. D.; Yang, R. J. Electrophoresis 2008, 29, 4862.
5. Huang, K. D.; Yang, R. J. Microfluidics & Nanofluidics 2008, 5, 631.
6. Dhopeshwarkar, R.; Crooks, R. M.; Hlushkou, D.; Tallarek, U. Anal. Chem. 2008, 80,1039.
7. Mani, A.; Zangle, T. A.; Santiago, J. G. Langmuir 2009, 25, 3898.
8. Kim, S. J.; Wang, Y.-C.; Lee, J. H.; Jang, H.; Han, J. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2007, 99, 044501.
9. Stein, D.; Kruithof, M.; Dekker, G Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004, 93, 035901.
10. Schoch, R. B.; Renaud, P. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2005, 86, 253111.
11. van der Heyden, F. H. J.; Stein, D.; Dekker, G Phys. Rev. Lett. 2005, 95, 116104.
12. Plecis, A.; Schoch, R. B.; Renaud, P. Nano Lett. 2005, 5, 1147.
13. Qian, S.; Das, B.; Luo, X. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2007, 315, 721.
14. Hughes, B. T.; Berg, J. M.; James, D. L.; Ibraguimov, A.; Liu, S.; Temkin, H. Microfluid Nanofluid 2008, 5, 761.
15. Plecis, A.; Nanteuil, C.; Haghiri-Gosnet, A.-M.; Chen, Y. Anal. Chem. 2008, 80, 9542.
16. Daiguji, H.; Yang, P.; Majumdar, A. Nano Lett. 2004, 4, 137.
17. Daiguji, H.; Oka, Y.; Shirono, K. Nano Lett. 2005, 5, 2274.
18. Han, J.; Fu, J.; Schoch, R. B. Lab Chip 2008, 8, 23.
19. Kemery, P. J.; Steehler, J. K.; Bohn, P. W. Langmuir 1998, 14, 2884.
20. Kuo, Tzu-Chi; Sloan, L. A.; Sweedler, J. V.; Bohn, P. W. Langmuir 2001, 17, 6298.
21. Kuo, Tzu-Chi; Cannon, D. M., Jr.; Chen, Y.; Tulock, J. J.; Shannon, M. A.; Sweedler, J. V.; Bohn, P. W. Anal. Chem. 2003, 75,1861.
22. Cannon, D. M., Jr.; Kuo, Tzu-Chi; Bohn, P. W.; Sweedler, J. V. Anal. Chem. 2003, 75, 2224.
23. Yaroshchuk, A. E.; Dukhin, S. S. J. Membr. Sci. 1993, 79,133.
24. Yaroshchuk, A. E. Adv. Colloid & Interface Sci. 1995, 60, 1.
25. Nechaev, A. N 1993, personal communication.
26. Dresner, L. J. Phys. Chem. 1963, 67,1365.
27. Morrison, F. A.; Osterle, J. F. J. Chem. Phys. 1965, 43, 2111.
28. Gross, R. J.; Osterle, J. F. J. Chem. Phys. 1968, 49, 228.
29. Fair, J. C.; Osterle, J. F. J. Chem. Phys. 1971,54, 3307.
30. Osterle, J. F.; Pechersky, M. J. Phys. Chem. 1971, 75, 3015.
31. Sélégny, E.; Boyd, J. D.; Gregor, H. P. In Charged Gels and Membranes, Part 1; Springer: New York, 1976, p 255.
32. Sasidhar, V.; Ruckenstein, E. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1981, 82,439.
33. Sasidhar, V.; Ruckenstein, E. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1982, 85, 332.
34. Hijnen, H. J. M.; van Daalen, J.; Smit, J. A. M. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1985, 107, 525.
35. Martinez, L.; Hernandez, A.; Tejerina, F. Sep. Sci. Technol. 1988, 23, 243.
36. Mafé, S.; Manzanares, J. A.; Pellicer, J. J. Membr. Sci. 1990, 51, 161.
37. Hijnen, H. J. M.; Smit, J. A. M. J. Membr. Sci 1995, 99, 285.
38. Hijnen, H. J. M.; Smit, J. A. M. J. Membr. Sci. 2000, 168, 259.
39. Fievet, P.; Aoubiza, B.; Szymczyk, A.; Pagetti, J. J. Membr. Sci 1999, 160, 267.
40. Westermann-Clark, G. B.; Christoforou, C.C. J. Electroanal. Chem. 1986, 198 ,213.
41. Koh, W. H.; Anderson, J. L. AIChE J. 1975, 21, 1176.
42. Anderson, J. L.; Koh, W. H. J. Colloid Interface Sci 1977, 59,149.
43. Koh, W. H. J. Colloid Interface Sci 1979, 77, 613.
44. Westermann-Clark, G. B.; Anderson, J. L. J. Eledrochem. Soc. 1983, 130, 839.
45. Szymczyk, A.; Fievet, P.; Aoubiza, B.; Simon, C.; Pagetti, J. J. Membr. Sci. 1999,161, 275.
46. Szymczyk, A.; Aoubiza, B.; Fievet, P.; Pagetti, J. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1999, 216, 285.
47. Labbez, C.; Fievet, P.; Szymczyk, A.; Aoubiza, B.; Vidonne, A.; Pagetti, J. J. Membr. Sci. 2001, 184, 79.
48. Fievet, P.; Szymczyk, A.; Labbez, C.; Aoubiza, B.; Simon, C.; Foissy, A.; Pagetti, J. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2001, 235, 383.
49. Szymczyk, A.; Fievet, P.; Aoubiza, B. Desalination 2003, 151, 177.
50. Sbai, M.; Fievet, P.; Szymczyk, A.; Aoubiza, B.; Vidonne, A.; Foissy, A. J. Membr. Sci. 2003, 215,1.
51. Neogi, P.; Ruckenstein, E. J. Colloid Interface Sci 1981, 79,159.
52. Smit, J. A. M. J. Colloid Interface Sci 1989, 132, 413.
53. Yaroshchuk, A. E. J. Membr. Sci 2000, 167, 163.
54. Cervera, J.; Garcia-Morales, V.; Pellicer, J. J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, 107, 8300.
55. Petsev, D. N J. Chem. Phys. 2005, 123, 244907.
56. Pennathur, S.; Santiago, J. G. Anal. Chem. 2005, 77,6772.
57. Xuan, X. Electrophoresis 2008, 29 3737.
58. Baldessari, F.; Santiago, J. G. J. Colloid Interface Sci 2008, 325, 526.
59. Kim, K. J.; Stevens, P. V. J. Membr. Sci 1997, 123, 303.
60. Brendler, E.; Ratkje, S. K.; Hertz, H. G. Electrochim. Acta 1996, 41, 169.
61. Huisman, I. H.; Pradanos, P.; Calvo, J. I.; Hernandez, A. J. Membr. Sci. 2000, 178, 79.
62. Berezkin, V. V.; Kiseleva, O. A.; Nechaev, A. N.; Sobolev, V. D.; Churaev, N. V. Colloid J. 1994, 56, 258.
63. Déjardin, P.; Vasina, E. N.; Berezkin, V. V.; Sobolev, V. D.; Volkov, V. I. Langmuir 2005, 27, 4680.
64. Zhou, K.; Kovarik, M. L.; Jacobson, S. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 8614.
65. Yaroshchuk, A. E.; Zhukova, O. V.; Ulbricht, M.; Ribitsch, V. Langmuir 2005, 21, 6872.
66. Taylor, J.; Ren, C. L. Microfluid Nanofluid 2005, 1, 356.
67. Ren, C. L.; Li, D. Anal. Chim. Acta 2005, 531, 15.
68. Conlisk, A. T.; McFerran, J.; Zheng, Z.; Hansford, D. Anal. Chem. 2002, 74, 2139.
69. Zheng, Z.; Hansford, D. J.; Conlisk, A. T. Electrophoresis 2003, 24, 3006.
70. Choi, Y. S.; Kim, S. J. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2009, 333, 672.
71. Yaroshchuk, A. E.; Boiko, Yu.P.; Makovetskiy, A. L. Langmuir 2005, 21, 7680.
72. Yaroshchuk, A. E.; Boiko, Yu.P.; Makovetskiy, A. L. Langmuir 2002, 18, 5154.
73. Labbez, C.; Fievet, P.; Szymczyk, A.; Aoubiza, B.; Vidonne, A.; Pagetti, J. J. Membr. Sci. 2001, 184, 79.
74. Yaroshchuk, A. E. J. Membr. Sci. 2000, 167, 149.
75. Fievet, P.; Sbai, M.; Szymczyk, A. J. Membr. Sci. 2005, 264,1.
76. Yaroshchuk, A. E.; Makovetskiy, A. L.; Boiko, Yu.P.; Galinker, E. W. J. Membr. Sci. 2000, 172, 203.
77. Yaroshchuk, A. E.; Ribitsch, V. Chem. Eng. J. 2000, 80, 203.
78. Yaroshchuk, A. E.; Vovkogon, Yu.A. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1995, 172, 324.
79. Within the scope of irreversible thermodynamics, thermodynamically independent properties are quantified by different coefficients in the Onsager matrix of phenomenological coefficients.
80. In this approximation, it is assumed that the flux of a solute relative to the center of mass is proportional to the gradient of electrochemical potential of this solute alone. Generally, for example, due to the solution nonideality, there are some contributions of gradients of electrochemical potentials of other solutes.
81. Because of the relatively low porosity of polyfluoroethylene support, a considerable proportion of pores of TEM could otherwise be seated against impermeable zones of this material.
82. Of course, the electroviscosity depends on the pore size, surface charge density and the electrolyte concentration. The indicated correction magnitude corresponds to the properties of membranes used in this study.
83. The electrode potential is controlled by the salt concentrations in the feed and the permeate compartments. After pressure switch-off, the permeate concentration ultimately changes due to the salt diffusion through the membrane. However, in our setup, this takes quite a long time (at least 1 h) primarily due to the presence of relatively thick porous support beneath the membrane. Our measurements were essentially shorter (up to 100 s).
84. The fact that the fluctuations decayed more rapidly in the more concentrated solution (lower electrical resistance) can be an indication of their appearance due to the presence of some parasitic inductivities and capacities in our system.