Usefulness of CT volumetry for primary gastric lesions in predicting pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer

Abdominal Imaging

Volumn 34, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 430-440

  Lee, Sang Min ^a   Kim, Se Hyung ^a   Lee, Jeong Min ^a,b   Im, Seock Ah ^b   Bang, Yung Jue ^b   Kim, Woo Ho ^b   Kim, Min A ^b   Yang, Han Kwang ^b   Lee, Hyuk Joon ^b   Kang, Won Jun ^c   Han, Joon Koo ^a,b   Choi, Byung Ihn ^a,b  

^a Seoul National University   (South Korea)

^b Seoul National University Hospital   (South Korea)

^c Yonsei University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

CT; Gastric cancer; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; Pathologic response; Volumetry

Indexed keywords

ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENT; FLUOROURACIL; FOLINIC ACID; OXALIPLATIN;

ADULT; ADVANCED CANCER; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER ADJUVANT THERAPY; CANCER GRADING; CANCER PATIENT; CANCER REGRESSION; CANCER SIZE; CANCER STAGING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC VOLUMETRY; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; FEMALE; GASTRECTOMY; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; LYMPH NODE; MALE; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; MULTIPLE CYCLE TREATMENT; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RADIOLOGIST; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STOMACH CANCER; THICKNESS; TREATMENT RESPONSE;

ADULT; AGED; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; GASTRECTOMY; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; LYMPHATIC METASTASIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOADJUVANT THERAPY; NEOPLASM STAGING; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; STOMACH NEOPLASMS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 68549092666     PISSN: 09428925     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00261-008-9420-8     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. AM Ekstrom LE Hansson LB Signorello 2000 Decreasing incidence of both major histologic subtypes of gastric adenocarcinoma-a population-based study in Sweden Br J Cancer 83 391 396
2. A Jemal R Siegel E Ward 2007 Cancer statistics, 2007 CA Cancer J Clin 57 43 66
3. DM Parkin F Bray J Ferlay 2005 Global cancer statistics, 2002 CA Cancer J Clin 55 74 108
4. DH Roukos 2000 Current status and future perspectives in gastric cancer management Cancer Treat Rev 26 243 255
5. RM Gore 1997 Gastric cancer. Clinical and pathologic features Radiol Clin North Am 35 295 310
6. JP Kim 1999 Surgical results in gastric cancer Semin Surg Oncol 17 132 138
7. D Cunningham WH Allum SP Stenning 2006 Perioperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal cancer N Engl J Med 355 11 20
8. P Therasse SG Arbuck EA Eisenhauer 2000 New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada J Natl Cancer Inst 92 205 216
9. P Therasse EA Eisenhauer J Verweij 2006 RECIST revisited: a review of validation studies on tumour assessment Eur J Cancer 42 1031 1039
10. TG Hayes GF Falchook GR Varadhachary 2006 Phase I trial of oral talactoferrin alfa in refractory solid tumors Invest New Drugs 24 233 240
11. JE Husband LH Schwartz J Spencer 2004 Evaluation of the response to treatment of solid tumours-a consensus statement of the International Cancer Imaging Society Br J Cancer 90 2256 2260
12. AJ Beer HA Wieder F Lordick 2006 Adenocarcinomas of esophagogastric junction: multi-detector row CT to evaluate early response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy Radiology 239 472 480
13. SH Kim JM Lee JK Han 2005 Effect of adjusted positioning on gastric distention and fluid distribution during CT gastrography AJR Am J Roentgenol 185 1180 1184
14. Fleming ID, Cooper JS, Henson DE et al. (1997) American Joint Committee on Cancer. Manual for staging of cancer, 5th ed., Philadelphia, Lippincott, pp 71-76
15. O Dworak L Keilholz A Hoffmann 1997 Pathological features of rectal cancer after preoperative radiochemotherapy Int J Colorectal Dis 12 19 23
16. AM Mandard F Dalibard JC Mandard 1994 Pathologic assessment of tumor regression after preoperative chemoradiotherapy of esophageal carcinoma. Clinicopathologic correlations Cancer 73 2680 2686
17. S Kumano T Murakami T Kim 2005 T staging of gastric cancer: role of multi-detector row CT Radiology 237 961 966
18. HJ Kim AY Kim ST Oh 2005 Gastric cancer staging at multi-detector row CT gastrography: comparison of transverse and volumetric CT scanning Radiology 236 879 885
19. AY Kim HJ Kim HK Ha 2005 Gastric cancer by multidetector row CT: preoperative staging Abdom Imaging 30 465 472
20. J Hur MS Park JH Lee 2006 Diagnostic accuracy of multidetector row computed tomography in T- and N staging of gastric cancer with histopathologic correlation J Comput Assist Tomogr 30 372 377
21. CY Chen JS Hsu DC Wu 2007 Gastric cancer: preoperative local staging with 3D multi-detector row CT-correlation with surgical and histopathologic results Radiology 242 472 482
22. DM Yang HC Kim W Jin 2007 64 multidetector-row computed tomography for preoperative evaluation of gastric cancer: histological correlation J Comput Assist Tomogr 31 98 103
23. K Ott U Fink K Becker 2003 Prediction of response to preoperative chemotherapy in gastric carcinoma by metabolic imaging: results of a prospective trial J Clin Oncol 21 4604 4610
24. PD Shreve Y Anzai RL Wahl 1999 Pitfalls in oncologic diagnosis with FDG PET imaging: physiologic and benign variants Radiographics 19 61 77 quiz 150-151
25. A Stahl K Ott WA Weber 2003 FDG PET imaging of locally advanced gastric carcinomas: correlation with endoscopic and histopathological findings Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 30 288 295