Diagnostic accuracy of multidetector row computed tomography in T- and N staging of gastric cancer with histopathologic correlation

Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography

Volumn 30, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 372-377

  Hur, Jin ^a   Park, Mi Suk ^a,b,c   Lee, Jae Hee ^a   Lim, Joon Seok ^b   Yu, Jeong Sik ^a   Hong, Yoo Jin ^a   Kim, Ki Whang ^b  

^a Yonsei University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^b Yonsei University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^c Yonsei University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Computed tomography; Gastric cancer; Multidetector row; Staging

Indexed keywords

DIAGNOSIS; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY;

CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; CT IMAGE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; GASTRIC CANCERS; MCNEMAR'S TESTS; MULTI-DETECTORS; MULTIDETECTOR ROW; MULTIDETECTOR ROW COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; STAGING;

DISEASES;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER CLASSIFICATION; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER PATIENT; CANCER STAGING; CANCER SURGERY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGIST; STOMACH CANCER; STOMACH RADIOGRAPHY; STOMACH SURGERY;

EID: 33745276245     PISSN: 03638715     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00004728-200605000-00005     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Yokota T, Ishiyama S, Saito T, et al. Lymph node metastasis as a significant prognostic factor in gastric cancer: a multiple logistic regression analysis. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2004;39:380-384.
2. Noguchi Y, Imada T, Matsumoto A, et al. Radical surgery for gastric cancer: a review of the Japanese experience. Cancer. 1989;64:2053-2062.
3. Bhandari S, Shim CS, Kim JH, et al. Usefulness of three-dimensional, multidetector row CT (virtual gastroscopy and multiplanar reconstruction) in the evaluation of gastric cancer: a comparison with conventional endoscopy, EUS, and histopathology. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;59:619-626.
4. Kim AY, Kim HJ, Ha HK. Gastric cancer by multidetector row CT: preoperative staging. Abdom Imaging. 2005;30:465-472.
5. Sobin LH, Wittekind CH, eds. International Union Against Cancer. TNM Classification of Malignant Tumors, 5th ed., New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 1997.
6. Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma: 2nd English ed. Gastric Cancer. 1998;1:10-24.
7. Ichikura T, Tomimatsu S, Uefuji K, et al. Evaluation of the new American Joint Committee on Cancer/International Union Against Cancer classification of lymph node metastasis from gastric carcinoma in comparison with the Japanese classification. Cancer. 1999;86:553-558.
8. Hayashi H, Ochiai T, Suzuki T, et al. Superiority of a new UICC- TNM staging system for gastric carcinoma. Surgery. 2000;127:129-135.
9. Ichikawa D, Kurioka H, Ueshima Y, et al. Prognostic value of lymph node staging in gastric cancer. Hepatogastroenterology. 2003;50:301-304.
10. Japanese Research Society for Gastric Cancer. The general rules for the gastric cancer in surgery and pathology. Jpn J Surg. 1981;11:127-139.
11. Saini S. Multi-detector row CT: principles and practice for abdominal applications. Radiology. 2004;233:323-327.
12. D'Elia F, Zingarelli A, Palli D, et al. Hydro-dynamic CT preoperative staging of gastric cancer: correlation with pathological findings. A prospective study of 107 cases. Eur Radiol. 2000;10:1877-1885.
13. Habermann CR, Weiss F, Riecken R, et al. Preoperative staging of gastric adenocarcinoma: comparison of helical CT and endoscopic US. Radiology. 2004;230:465-471.
14. Balfe DM, Mauro MA, Koehler RE, et al. Gastrohepatic ligament: normal and pathologic CT anatomy. Radiology. 1984;150:485-490.
15. Dorfman RE, Alpern MB, Gross BH, et al. Upper abdominal lymph nodes: criteria for normal size determined with CT. Radiology. 1991;180:319-322.
16. Fukuya T, Honda H, Kaneko K, et al. Efficacy of helical CT in T-staging of gastric cancer. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1997;21:73-81.
17. Takao M, Fukuda T, Iwanaga S, et al. Gastric cancer: evaluation of triphasic spiral CT and radiologic-pathologic correlation. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1998;22:288-294.
18. Botet JF, Lightdale CJ, Zauber AG, et al. Preoperative staging of gastric cancer: comparison of endoscopic US and dynamic CT. Radiology. 1991;181:426-432.
19. Minami M, Kawauchi N, Itai Y, et al. Gastric tumors: radiologic- pathologic correlation and accuracy of T-staging with dynamic CT. Radiology. 1992;185:173-178.
20. Cho JS, Kim JK, Rho SM, et al. Preoperative assessment of gastric carcinoma: value of two-phase dynamic CT with mechanical injection of contrast material. AJR. 1994;163:69-75.
21. Hundt W, Braunschweig R, Reiser M. Assessment of gastric cancer: value of breathhold technique and two-phase spiral CT. Eur Radiol. 1999;9:68-72.
22. Higashi H, Natsugoe S, Ishigami S, et al. Distribution of lymph node metastasis including mircometastasis in gastric cancer with submucosal invasion. World J Surg. 2003;27:455-459.
23. Shimizu K, Ito K, Matsunaga N, et al. Diagnosis of gastric cancer with MDCT using the water-filling method and multiplanar reconstruction: CT-histologic correlation. AJR. 2005;185:1152-1158.