Robotic camera holder as good as expert camera holder: A randomized crossover trial

Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy and Percutaneous Techniques

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 272-275

  Uchal, Miro ^a   Haughn, Christopher ^a   Raftopoulos, Yannis ^a   Hussain, Farheen ^b   Reed, James F ^b   Tjugum, Jostein ^c   Bergamaschi, Roberto ^a,c,d  

^a ALLEGHENY GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b LEHIGH VALLEY HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c Forde Health System   (Norway)

^d STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

AESOP; Camera holder; Laparoscopy; Motion analysis; Robot; Task

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY DEVICE; CAMERA; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSSOVER PROCEDURE; DUODENUM PERFORATION; ERROR; HUMAN; INSTRUMENT VALIDATION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; OPERATION DURATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REPEAT PROCEDURE; RESIDENT; ROBOTICS; SIMULATION; SIMULATOR; STOMACH SURGERY; SUTURING METHOD; TISSUE INJURY;

CROSS-OVER STUDIES; DUODENAL DISEASES; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMANS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; ROBOTICS; RUPTURE; STOMACH DISEASES; SUTURE TECHNIQUES; VIDEO RECORDING;

EID: 68549087093     PISSN: 15304515     EISSN: 15344908     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3181a6da6c     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Gallagher A, Satava R, Seymour N, et al. Ninth International Congress of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES) Maastricht, Netherlands June 2001. An ergonomic analysis of the effects of camera rotation on laparoscopic performance. Surg Endosc. 2002;16:S1-S80.
2. Way LW, Stewart L, Gantert W, et al. Causes and prevention of laparoscopic bile duct injuries: analysis of 252 cases from a human factors and cognitive psychology perspective. Ann Surg. 2003;237:460-469.
3. Jaspers JE, Breedveld P, Herder JL, et al. Camera and instrument holders and their clinical value in minimally invasive surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2004; 14:145-152.
4. Merola S, Weber P, Wasielewski A, et al. Comparison of laparoscopic colectomy with and without the aid of a robotic camera holder. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2004; 12:46-51.
5. Kondraske GV, Hamilton EC, Scott DJ, et al. Surgeon workload and motion efficiency with robot and human laparoscopic camera control. Surg Endosc. 2002;16:1523-1527.
6. Kraft BM, Jager C, Kraft K, et al. The AESOP robot system in laparoscopic surgery: increased risk or advantage for surgeon and patient? Surg Endosc. 2004;18:1216-1223.
7. Proske JM, Dagher I, Franco D. Comparative study of human and robotic camera control in laparoscopic biliary and colon surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2004;14:345-348.
8. Piaggio G, Elbourne DR, Altman DG, et al, CONSORT Group. Reporting of noninferiority and equivalence randomized trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement. JAMA. 2006;295:1152-1160.
9. Uchal M, Raftopoulos Y, Tjugum J, et al. Validation of a six-task simulation model in minimally invasive surgery. Surg Endosc. 2005;19:109-116.
10. Cuschieri A, Szabo Z. Tissue Approximation in Endoscopic Surgery. Oxford: ISIS Medical Media; 1995.
11. Matern U, Waller P. Instruments for minimally invasive surgery: principles of ergonomic handles. Surg Endosc. 1999; 13:174-182.
12. Meng WC, Kwok SP, Leung KL, et al. Optimal position of working ports in laparoscopic surgery: an in vitro study. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1996;6:278-281.
13. Satava RM, Cuschieri A, Hamdorf J. Metrics for Objective Assessment of Surgical Skills Workshop. Metrics for objective assessment. Surg Endosc. 2003;17:220-226.
14. den Boer KT, Bruijn M, Jaspers JE, et al. Time-action analysis of instrument positioners in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2002;16:142-147.
15. Gallagher AG, Ritter EM, Satava RM. Fundamental principles of validation, and reliability: rigorous science for the assessment of surgical education and training. Surg Endosc. 2003;17:1525-1529.
16. Van Sickle KR, McClusky DA 3rd, Gallagher AG, et al. Construct validation of the ProMIS simulator using a novel laparoscopic suturing task. Surg Endosc. 2005;19:1227-1231.
17. Cesanek P, Uchal M, Uranues S, et al. Do hybrid simulator-generated metrics correlate with content valid outcome measures? Surg Endosc. 2008;22:2178-2183.