Comparison of laparoscopic colectomy with and without the aid of a robotic camera holder

Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy and Percutaneous Techniques

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 46-51

  Merola, Stephen ^a   Weber, Philip ^a   Wasielewski, Annette ^a   Ballantyne, Garth H ^a  

^a HACKENSACK UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Laparoscopic Colectomy; Laparoscopy; Robotic Surgery; Robotics

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CAMERA; COLON RESECTION; FEMALE; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; OPERATION DURATION; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ROBOTICS; SURGEON; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;

ADULT; AGED; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; COLECTOMY; FEMALE; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROBOTICS; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE;

EID: 0036175882     PISSN: 10517200     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00019509-200202000-00008     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Robotic interactive laparoscopic cholecystectomy
2. One year of experience working with the aid of a robotic assistant (the voice-controlled optic holder AESOP) in gynaecological endoscopic surgery
3. Robotic arm enhancement to accommodate improved efficiency and decreased resource utilization in complex minimally invasive surgical procedures
4. Comparison of robotic versus human laparoscopic camera control
5. Laparoscopic-assisted colorectal surgery: Review of results in 752 patients
6. A review of robotics in surgery