Evaluation of air handling in a new generation neonatal oxygenator with integral arterial filter

Perfusion

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 107-112

  Gomez, Daniel ^a   Preston, T J ^a   Olshove, V F ^a   Phillips, A B ^a,b   Galantowicz, M E ^a,b  

^a NATIONWIDE CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Arterial line filter; Cardiopulmonary bypass; EDAC; Gaseous microemboli; Oxygenator

Indexed keywords

ARTERIAL LINE FILTER; ARTICLE; BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT; CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS; FILTER; GASEOUS MICROEMBOLISM; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MICROEMBOLISM; NEWBORN; OXYGENATION; OXYGENATOR; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS; HEART FAILURE; HUMANS; INFANT; OXYGENATORS;

EID: 68449095543     PISSN: 02676591     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0267659109106825     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Butler, DB. Gaseous micro emboli: Concepts and considerations. J Extra Corpor Technol 1983; 15(6): 148-155.
2. Lynch, JE, Riley, JB. Microemboli detection on extracorporeal bypass circuits. Perfusion 2008; 23(1): 23-32.
3. Merkle, F, Bottcher, W, Hetzer, R. Prebypass filtration of cardiopulmonary bypass circuits: An outdated technique? Perfusion 2003; 18(Suppl 1): 81-88.
4. Myers, GJ. Preventing gaseous microemboli during blood sampling and drug administration: An in vitro investigation. J Extra Corpor Technol 2007; 39(3): 192-198.
5. Norman, MJ, Sistino, JJ, Acsell, JR. The effectiveness of low-prime cardiopulmonary bypass circuits at removing gaseous emboli. J Extra Corpor Technol 2004; 36(4): 336-342.
6. Schreiner, RS, Rider, AR, Myers, JW, et al. Microemboli detection and classification by innovative ultrasound technology during simulated neonatal cardiopulmonary bypass at different flow rates, perfusion modes, and perfusate temperatures. Asaio J 2008; 54(3): 316-324.
7. Undar, A, Ji, B, Kunselman, AR, Myers, JL. Detection and classification of gaseous microemboli during pulsatile and nonpulsatile perfusion in a simulated neonatal CPB model. Asaio J 2007; 53(6): 725-729.
8. Wang, S, Win, KN, Kunselman, AR, Woitas, K, Myers, JL, Undar, A. The capability of trapping gaseous microemboli of two pediatric arterial filters with pulsatile and nonpulsatile flow in a simulated infant CPB model. Asaio J 2008; 54(5): 519-522.
9. Win, KN, Wang, S, Undar, A. Microemboli generation, detection and characterization during CPB procedures in neonates, infants, and small children. Asaio J 2008; 54(5): 486-490.
10. Merkle, F, Boettcher, W, Schulz, F, et al. Reduction of microemboli count in the priming fluid of cardiopulmonary bypass circuits. J Extra Corpor Technol 2003; 35(2): 133-138.
11. Riley, JB. Arterial line filters ranked for gaseous microemboli separation performance: An in vitro study. J Extra Corpor Technol 2008; 40(1): 21-26.
12. Groom, RC, Froebe, S, Martin, J, et al. Update on pediatric perfusion practice in North America: 2005 survey. J Extra Corpor Technol 2005; 37(4): 343-350.
13. Elliott, M. Current paediatric perfusion practice in the UK. Perfusion 1993; (8): 7-25.
14. Diegeler, A, Hirsch, R, Schneider, F, et al. Neuromonitoring and neurocognitive outcome in off-pump versus conventional coronary bypass operation. Ann Thorac Surg 2000; 69(4): 1162-1166.