Flexible target representations underlie repetition priming in visual search

Visual Cognition

Volumn 17, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 655-678

  McBride, Jennifer ^a   Leonards, Ute ^a   Gilchrist, Iain ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Colour; Feature Type; Orientation; Repetition priming; Visual search

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COLOR; CONTROLLED STUDY; EPISODIC MEMORY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPONSE TIME; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISION; VISUAL ORIENTATION; VISUAL SEARCH; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EID: 68449088777     PISSN: 13506285     EISSN: 14640716     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13506280802257147     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Ariga, A., & Kawahara, J. (2004). The perceptual and cognitive distractor-previewing effect. Journal of Vision, 4(10), 891-903.
2. Chun, M. M., & Jiang, Y. (1998). Contextual cueing: Implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention. Cognitive Psychology, 36(1), 28-71.
3. Cohen, A., & Magen, H. (1999). Intra- and cross- dimensional visual search for single-feature targets. Perception and Psychophysics, 32, 128-181.
4. DeSchepper, B., & Treisman, A. (1996). Visual memory for novel shapes: Implicit encoding without attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22(1), 27-47.
5. Fecteau, J. H. (2007). Priming of pop-out depends upon the current goals of observers. Journal of Vision, 7, 1-11. Retrieved from http://journalofvision.org/17/16/11/. DOI:10.1167/1167.1166.1161.
6. Found, A., & Müller, H. J. (1996). Searching for unknown feature targets on more than one dimension: Investigating a "dimension-weighting" account. Perception and Psychophysics, 58(1), 88-101.
7. Goolsby, B. A., & Suzuki, S. (2001). Understanding priming of color-singleton search: Roles of attention at encoding and "retrieval". Perception and Psychophysics, 63(6), 929-944.
8. Hillstrom, A. P. (2000). Repetition effects in visual search. Perception and Psychophysics, 62(4), 800-817.
9. Huang, L. Q., Holcombe, A. O., & Pashler, H. (2004). Repetition priming in visual search: Episodic retrieval, not feature priming. Memory and Cognition, 32(1), 12-20.
10. Kristjánsson, Á. (2006). Simultaneous priming along multiple feature dimensions in a visual search task. Vision Research, 46 2554-2570.
11. Kristjánsson, Á., Wang, D. L., & Nakayama, K. (2002). The role of priming in conjunctive visual search. Cognition, 85(1), 37-52.
12. Kumada, T. (2001). Feature-based control of attention: Evidence for two forms of dimension weighting. Perception and Psychophysics, 63 4), 698-708.
13. Kunar, M. A., Humphreys, G. W., Smith, K. J., & Hulleman, J. (2003). What is "marked" in visual marking? Evidence for effects of configuration in preview search. Perception and Psychophysics, 65(6), 982-996.
14. Maljkovic, V., & Nakayama, K. (1994). Priming of pop-out I: Role of features. Memory and Cognition, 22(6), 657-672.
15. Maljkovic, V., & Nakayama, K. (1996). Priming of pop-out II: Role of position. Perception and Psychophysics, 58(7), 977-991.
16. Maljkovic, V., & Nakayama, K. (2000). Priming of pop-out III: A short-term implicit memory system beneficial for rapid target selection. Visual Cognition, 7(5), 571-595.
17. McPeek, R. M., Maljkovic, V., & Nakayama, K. (1999). Saccades require focal attention and are facilitated by a short-term memory system. Vision Research, 39(8), 1555-1566.
18. Meeter, M., & Olivers, C. N. L. (2006). Intertrial priming stemming from ambiguity: A new account of priming in visual search. Visual Cognition, 13(2), 202-222.
19. Mü ller, H. J., Heller, D., & Ziegler, J. (1995). Visual search for singleton feature targets within and across feature dimensions. Perception and Psychophysics, 57, 1-17.
20. Neill, W. T. (1997). Episodic retrieval in negative priming and repetition priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 1291-1305.
21. Nissen, M. J. (1985). Accessing features and objects: Is location special? In M. I. Posner & O. S. M. Marin (Eds.), Attention and performance XI: Attention and neuropsychology (pp. 205-219). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
22. Olivers, C., Humphreys, G., & Braithwaite, J. (2006). The preview search task: Evidence for visual marking. Visual Cognition, 14 4-8), 716-735.
23. Olivers, C. N. L., & Meeter, M. (2006). On the dissociation between compound and present/absent tasks in visual search: Intertrial priming is ambiguity driven. Visual Cognition, 13(1), 1-28.
24. Sireteanu, R., & Rattenbach, R. (1995). Perceptual-learning in visual-search - fast, enduring, but nonspecific. Vision Research, 35(14), 2037-2043.
25. Sireteanu, R., & Rattenbach, R. (2000). Perceptual learning in visual search generalizes over tasks, locations, and eyes. Vision Research 40(21), 2925-2949.
26. Theeuwes, J., Reimann, B., & Mortier, K. (2006). Visual search for featural singletons: No top-down modulation, only bottom-up priming. Visual Cognition, 14(4-8), 466-489.
27. Treisman, A., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of visual attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136.
28. Wang, D., Kristjánsson, Á., & Nakayama, K. (2005). Efficient visual search without top-down or bottom-up guidance. Perception and Psychophysics, 67(2), 239-253.
29. Watson, D. G., & Humphreys, G. W. (1997). Visual marking: Prioritizing selection for new objects by top-down attentional inhibition of old objects. Psychological Review, 104(1), 90-122.
30. Wolfe, J. M. (1994). Guided Search 2.0: A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 1(2), 202-238.