Udder quarter milk composition at different levels of somatic cell count in cow composite milk

Animal

Volumn 3, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 710-717

  Forsback L ^a   Lindmark Mansson H ^b   Andren A ^a   Kerstedt, M ^a   Svennersten Sjaunja, K ^a  

^a SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

^b Swedish Dairy Association   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Dairy cow; Milk composition; Milk quality; Quarter milk; SCC

Indexed keywords

BOS;

EID: 68349147827     PISSN: 17517311     EISSN: 1751732X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1751731109004042     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Auldist MJ, Coats S, Sutherland BJ, Mayes JJ, McDowell GH and Rogers GL 1996. Effects of somatic cell count and stage of lactation on raw milk composition and the yield and quality of Cheddar cheese. Journal of Dairy Research 63, 269-280.
2. Barkema HW, Schukken YH, Lam TJGM, Galligan DT, Beiboer ML and Brand A 1997. Estimation of interdependence among quarters of the bovine udder with subclinical mastitis and implications for analysis. Journal of Dairy Science 80, 1592-1599.
3. Berglund I, Pettersson G and Svennersten-Sjaunja K 2002. Automatic milking: effects on somatic cell count and teat end-quality. Livestock Production Science 78, 115-124.
4. Berglund I, Pettersson G, Ostensson K and Svennersten-Sjaunja K 2004. Frequency of individual udder quarters with elevated CMT scores in cows' milk samples with low somatic cell counts. Veterinary Record 155, 213.
5. Berglund I, Pettersson G, Östensson K and Svennersten-Sjaunja K 2007. Quarter milking for improved detection of increased SCC. Reproduction in Domestic Animals 42, 427-432.
6. Brolund L1985. Cell counts in bovine milk causes of variation and applicability for diagnosis of subclinical mastitis. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica Supple- mentum 80, 1-123.
7. Coulon J-B, Gasqui P, Barnouin J, Ollier A, Pradel P and Pomies D 2002. Effect of mastitis and related-germ on milk yield and composition during naturally- occurring udder infections in dairy cows. Animal Research 51, 383-393.
8. Daley MJ, Oldham ER, Williams TJ and Coyle PA 1991. Quantitative and qualitative of host polymorphonuclear cells during experimentally induced Staphylococcus aureus mastitis in cows. American Journal of Veterinary Research 52, 474-479.
9. EC 2004. Regulation No. 853/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 laying down specific hygiene rules for food of animal origin. Official Journal of the European Union L226, 22-82.
10. Haenlein GFW, Schultz LH and Zikakis JP 1973. Composition of proteins in milk with varying leucocyte contents. Journal of Dairy Science 56, 1017-1024.
11. Hamann J 2002. Relationships between somatic cell count and milk composition. Bulletin of the International Dairy Federation 372, 56-59.
12. Hamann J 2003. Definition of the physiological cell count threshold based on changes in milk composition. Bulletin of the International Dairy Federation381, 9-12.
13. Harmon RJ 1994. Physiology of mastitis and factors affecting somatic cell count. Journal of Dairy Science 77, 2103-2112.
14. Hortet P and Seegers H 1998. Loss in milk yield and related composition changes resulting from clinical mastitis in dairy cows. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 37, 1-20.
15. Hovinen M, Aisla AM and Pyörälä S 2006. Accuracy and reliability of mastitis detection with electrical conductivity and milk colour measurement in automatic milking. Acta Agriculturæ Scandinavica, Section A - Animal Sciences 56, 121-127.
16. Kitchen BJ 1981. Review of the progress of dairy science: bovine mastitis: milk compositional changes and related diagnostic tests. Journal of Dairy Research 48, 167-188.
17. Larsen LB, Rasmussen MD, Bjerring M and Nielsen JH 2004. Proteases and protein degradation in milk from cows infected with Streptococcus uberis. International Dairy Journal 14, 899-907.
18. Leitner G, Silanikove N, Jacobi S, Weisblit L, Bernstein S and Merin U 2008. The influence of storage on the farm and in dairy silos on milk quality for cheese production. International Dairy Journal 18, 109-113.
19. Linzell JL and Peaker M 1972. Day-to-day variations in milk composition in the goat and cow as a guide to the detection of subclinical mastitis. British Veterinary Journal 128, 284-295.
20. Merle R, Schröder A and Hamann J 2007. Cell function in the bovine mammary gland: a preliminary study on interdependence of healthy and infected udder quarters. Journal of Dairy Research 74, 174-179.
21. Munro GL, Grieve PA and Kitchen BJ 1984. Effects of mastitis on milk yield, milk composition, processing properties and yield and quality of milk products. Australian Journal of Dairy Technology 39, 7-16.
22. Pyörälä S and Pyörälä E 1997. Accuracy of methods using somatic cell count and N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase activity in milk to assess the bacteriological cure of bovine clinical mastitis. Journal of Dairy Science 80, 2820-2825.
23. Spörndly R 2003. Feed tables for ruminants 2003 (Fodertabeller för idisslare 2003). Department of Animal Nutrition and Management, SLU Swedish University of Agriculture Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
24. Statistical Analysis Systems Institute (SAS) 2004. SAS/STAT® 9.1 User's Guide. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.
25. Syrstad O 1977. Day-to-day variation in milk yield, fat content and protein content. Livestock Production Science 4, 141-151.
26. Taponen S, Koort J, Björkroth J, Saloniemi H and Pyörälä S 2007. Bovine intramammary infections caused by coagulase-negative staphylococci may persist throughout lactation according to amplified fragment length polymorphism-based analysis. Journal of Dairy Science 90, 3301-3307.
27. Tolle A, Heeschen W, Reichmoth J and Zeidler H 1971. Counting of somatic cells in milk and possibilities for automation. Dairy Science Abstracts 33, 875-879.
28. Urech E, Puhan Z and Schällibaum M 1999. Changes in milk protein fraction as affected by subclinical mastitis. Journal of Dairy Science 82, 2402-2411.