Quarter milking for improved detection of increased SCC

Reproduction in Domestic Animals

Volumn 42, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 427-432

  Berglund, I ^a   Pettersson, G ^a   Ostensson K ^b   Svennersten Sjaunja, K ^a  

^a Kungsangen Research Centre   (Sweden)

^b SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISEASE; ARTICLE; CATTLE; CATTLE DISEASE; CELL COUNT; CYTOLOGY; DAIRYING; EVALUATION; FEMALE; LACTATION; MILK; PATHOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; UDDER;

ANIMALS; CATTLE; CELL COUNT; DAIRYING; FEMALE; LACTATION; MAMMARY GLANDS, ANIMAL; MASTITIS, BOVINE; MILK;

EID: 34447273770     PISSN: 09366768     EISSN: 14390531     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0531.2006.00803.x     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Berglund I, Pettersson G, Östensson K, Svennersten-Sjaunja K, 2004 : Frequency of individual udder quarters with elevated CMT scores in cow's milk samples with low somatic cell counts. Vet Rec 155, 213.
2. Claesson O, 1965 : Variation in the rennin coagulation time in milk. Ann Agric Coll Sweden 31, 237 332.
3. Deluyker HA, 1991 : Milk yield fluctuations associated with mastitis. Flemische Vet J 62 (Suppl. 1 207 216.
4. Hamann J, 2004 : Pattern of somatic cell count in milk under automatic milking conditions (VMS) and interactions with milk constituents. In : Meijering A, Hogeveen H, de Koning CJAM (eds Automatic Milking - A Better Understanding, Proceedings March 24-27. Lelystadt, The Netherlands, pp. 329 334.
5. Harmon RJ, 1994 : Physiology of mastitis and factors affecting somatic cell counts. J Dairy Sci 77, 2103 2112.
6. Kitchen BJ, 1981 : Review of the progress of dairy science: bovine mastitis: milk compositional changes and related diagnostic tests. J Dairy Res 48, 167 188.
7. Klastrup O, Bakken G, Bramley J, Bushnell R, 1987 : Environmental influences on bovine mastitis. Bull Int Dairy Fed 217, 2 37.
8. Knight CH, Peaker M, 1991 : Mammary gland physiology. Flemishe Vet J, 62 Suppl. 1) 33 41.
9. Linzell JL, Peaker M, 1972 : Day-to-day variation in milk composition in the goat and cow as a guide to the detection of subclinical mastitis. Br Vet J 128, 284 295.
10. Miller RH, Emanuelsson U, Persson E, Brolund L, Philipsson J, Funke H, 1983 : Relationships of milk somatic cell counts to daily milk yield and composition. Acta Agric Scand 33, 209 223.
11. Nielsen NI, Larsen T, Bjerring M, Ingvartsen KL, 2005 : Quarter health, milking interval, and sampling time during milking affect the concentration of milk constituents. J Dairy Sci 83, 3186 3200.
12. SAS Institute, 2004. SAS/STAT 9.1 User's Guide. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.
13. Schalm OW, Carroll EJ, Jain NC, 1971 : Bovine Mastitis. Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia, PA.
14. Sjaunja L-O, 1986 : Day-to-day variation in milk yield, milk composition and somatic cell count. International Committee for Recording of the Productivity of Milk Animals (ICRPMA). 25th Session.
15. Sjaunja L-O, Baevre L, Junkarinen L, Pedersen J, Setälä J, 1990 : A Nordic proposal for an energy corrected milk (ECM) formula. ICAR, 27th Session. July 2-6, Paris, France. EAAP Publication No. 50, 156 157.
16. Spörndly R (ed.), 1995 : Fodertabell för idisslare. Rapport nr. 235. Department of Animal Nutrition and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden (in Swedish).
17. Svennersten-Sjaunja K, Sjögren M, Andersson I, Sjaunja L-O, 2005 : Milk analyses: a comparison between a simple IR-instrument for use on farm level and available IR-methods. In : Cox S (ed. Precision Livestock Farming. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, The Netherlands, pp. 141 147.
18. Tsenkova R, Atanassova S, Toyoda K, Itoh K, Fearn T, 1999 : Near-infrared spectroscopy for dairy management: measurement of unhomogenized milk composition. J Dairy Sci 82, 2344 2351.
19. Turner CW, 1946 : Physiology of milk secretion. In : Little RB Plastridge WN (eds Bovine Mastitis. A Symposium. McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc., New York and London, pp. 63 98.