Trunk anomalies in the centipede Stigmatogaster subterranea provide insight into late-embryonic segmentation

Arthropod Structure and Development

Volumn 38, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 417-426

  Leśniewska, Małgorzata ^a   Bonato, Lucio ^b   Minelli, Alessandro ^b   Fusco, Giuseppe ^b  

^a ADAM MICKIEWICZ UNIVERSITY   (Poland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Chilopoda; Developmental constraints; Evo devo; Morphogenesis; Segmental pattern; Teratology

Indexed keywords

ARTHROPOD; ARTICLE; CENTIPEDE; EMBRYO PATTERN FORMATION; EMBRYO SEGMENTATION; MORPHOGENESIS; NONHUMAN; STATISTICS; STIGMATOGASTER SUBTERRANEA; TERATOGENESIS; TRUNK;

ANIMALS; ARTHROPODS; BODY PATTERNING; EMBRYO, NONMAMMALIAN; EMBRYONIC DEVELOPMENT; POLAND;

ARTHROPODA; CHILOPODA; GEOPHILOMORPHA;

EID: 68349146409     PISSN: 14678039     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.asd.2009.05.001     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Arthur W., and Farrow M. The pattern of variation in centipede segment number as an example of developmental constraint in evolution. Journal of Theoretical Biology 200 (1999) 183-191
2. Attems C.G. Myriapoda I: Geophilomorpha. Das Tierreich vol. 52 (1929), De Gruyter, Berlin and Leipzig
3. Balazuc J., and Schubart O. La tératologie des myriapodes. Année Biologique 1 (1962) 145-174
4. Berto D., Fusco G., and Minelli A. Segmental units and shape control in centipedes. Entomologica Scandinavica 51 Suppl. (1997) 61-70
5. Brölemann H.W. La haute Vallée de la Neste (Myriapodes). Bulletin de la Société d'Histoire Naturelle de Toulouse 41 (1908) 57-67
6. Brolemann H.W. Élements d'une Faune des Myriapodes de France. Chilopodes (1930), Imprimerie Toulosaine, Toulouse
7. Chipman A.D., Arthur W., and Akam M. A double segment periodicity underlies segment generation in centipede development. Current Biology 14 (2004) 1250-1255
8. Chipman A.D., Arthur W., and Akam M. Early development and segment formation in the centipede, Strigamia maritima (Geophilomorpha). Evolution and Development 6 (2004) 78-89
9. Chipman A.D., and Akam M. The segmentation cascade in the centipede Strigamia maritima: involvement of the Notch pathway and pair-rule gene homologues. Developmental Biology 319 (2008) 160-169
10. Chipman A.D., and Stollewerk A. Specification of neural precursor identity in the geophilomorph centipede Strigamia maritima. Developmental Biology 290 (2006) 337-350
11. Cockayne E.A. Spiral and other anomalous forms of segmentation. Transactions of the Royal Entomological Society of London 77 (1929) 177-184
12. Cockayne E.A. Spiral and other anomalous forms of segmentation with an account of three ventral spirals in one brood of Hadena dissimilis Kn. Transactions of the Royal Entomological Society of London 82 (1934) 165-172
13. Ćurčić B.P.M., Krunić M.D., and Brajković M.M. Tergal and sternal anomalies in Neobisium Chamberlin (Neobisiidae, Pseudoscorpiones, Arachnida). Journal of Arachnology 11 (1983) 243-250
14. Demange J.-M. À propos de la description d'une nouvelle espèce de géophilomorphes du Maroc Orya panousei nov. sp. Bulletin de la Société des Sciences Naturelles et Physiques du Maroc 41 (1961) 211-227
15. Demange J.-M. Chilopoda. La réserve naturelle intégrale du Mont Nimba. Mémoires de l'Institut Française d'Afrique Noire 5 (1963) 41-118
16. Demange J.-M., and Pereira L.A. Deux anomalies segmentaires chez deux espèces de géophilomorphes du Perou (Myriapoda: Chilopoda). Senckenbergiana Biologica 60 1979 (1980) 261-267
17. Fusco G. How many processes are responsible for phenotypic evolution?. Evolution and Development 3 (2001) 279-286
18. Fusco G. Trunk segment numbers and sequential segmentation in myriapods. Evolution and Development 7 (2005) 608-617
19. Heymons R. Die Entwicklungsgeschichte der Scolopender. Zoologica 13 (1901) 1-244
20. Horneland E.O., and Meidell B.A. The epimorphosis of Strigamia maritima (Leach, 1817) (Chilopoda: Geophilomorpha). Entomologica Scandinavica 17 (1986) 127-129
21. Jacinto A., Wood W., Balayo T., Turmaine M., Martinez-Arias A., and Martin P. Dynamic actin-based epithelial adhesion and cell matching during Drosophila dorsal closure. Current Biology 10 (2000) 1420-1426
22. Jacinto A., Woolner S., and Martin P. Dynamic analysis of dorsal closure in Drosophila: from genetics to cell biology. Developmental Cell 3 (2002) 9-19
23. Johannsen O.A., and Butt F.H. Embryology of Insects and Myriapods. The Developmental History of Insects, Centipedes and Millipedes from Egg Deposition to Hatching (1941), McGraw-Hill, New York & London
24. Kettle C., Arthur W., Jowett T., and Minelli A. Homeotic transformation in a centipede. Trends in Genetics 15 (1999) 393
25. Kettle C., Johnstone J., Jowett T., Arthur H., and Arthur W. The pattern of segment formation, as revealed by engrailed expression, in a centipede with a variable number of segments. Evolution and Development 5 (2003) 198-207
26. Leśniewska, M., Bonato, L., Fusco, G. Morphological anomalies in a Polish population of Stigmatogaster subterranea (Chilopoda, Geophilomorpha): a multi-year survey. Soil Organisms, in press.
27. Leśniewska M., and Wojciechowski J. Haplophilus subterraneus (Shaw, 1794) (Chilopoda Geophilomorpha) - a representative of centipedes new for the fauna of Poland. Przeglad Zoologiczny 361 (1992) 133-136
28. Lewis J.G.E. The Biology of Centipedes (1981), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
29. Linder F. Abnormal body rings in Branchiopoda Notostraca. Zoologiska Bidrag frän Uppsala 25 (1947) 378-385
30. Lindner E.N. Einige Anmerkungen zum Vorkommen von Stigmatogaster subterraneus (Shaw, 1789) und Henia vesuviana (Newport, 1845) (Chilopoda: Geophilida) in Deutschland sowie Überblick über deren Verbreitung in Europa. Schubartiana 2 (2007) 49-56
31. Liu R., Woolner S., Johndrow J.E., Metzger D., Flores A., and Parkhurst S.M. Sisyphus, the Drosophila myosin XV homolog, traffics within filopodia transporting key sensory and adhesion cargos. Development 135 (2008) 53-63
32. Maruzzo D., Bonato L., Brena C., Fusco G., and Minelli A. Appendage loss and regeneration in arthropods: a comparative view. In: Koenemann S., and Jenner R. (Eds). Crustacea and Arthropod Relationships. Crustacean Issues vol. 16 (2005) 215-245
33. Metschnikoff E. Embryologisches über Geophilus. Zeitschrift für Wissenschaftliche Zoologie 25 (1875) 313-322
34. Minelli A. Chilopoda. In: Harrison F.W. (Ed). Microscopic Anatomy of Invertebrates vol. 12 (1993), Wiley-Liss, New York 57-114
35. Minelli A., and Bortoletto S. Myriapod metamerism and arthropod segmentation. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 33 (1988) 323-343
36. Minelli A., and Fusco G. Evo-devo perspectives on segmentation: model organisms, and beyond. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 19 (2004) 423-429
37. Minelli A., and Pasqual C. On some abnormal specimens of centipedes (Chilopoda). Lavori della Società Veneziana di Scienze Naturali 11 (1986) 135-141
38. Misioch M. Variation of characters in some geophilid chilopods. Abhandlungen und Verhandlungen des Naturwissenschaftlichen Vereins in Hamburg N.F 21-22 (1978) 55-62
39. Morgan T.H. Spiral modification of metamerism. Journal of Morphology 7 (1892) 245-251
40. Ramsay G.W. Spiral segmentation in two species of New Zealand weta (Orthoptera, Gryllacridoidea, Henicidae). Transactions of the Royal Society of New Zealand 86 (1959) 393-394
41. Selbie C.M. A new variety of Polydesmus coriaceus Porat, and note of a centipede monstrosity. Annals and Magazine of Natural History 12 (1913) 439-443
42. Sograff N. Zur Embryologie der Chilopoden. Zoologischer Anzeiger 5 (1882) 582-585
43. Sograff N.J. Materials toward the knowledge of the embryonic development of Geophilus ferrugineus and Geophilus proximus. Izvêstya Imperatorskago Obshchestva Lyubitelei Estestvoznaniya, Antropologii i Etnografii pri Impe-ratorskom Moskovskom Universitete 2 (1883) 1-77 (in Russian)
44. Verhoeff K.W. Chilopoda. In: Bronn H.G. (Ed). Klassen und Ordnungen des Tierreiches vol. 5 (1902-1925), Winter, Leipzig
45. Whitington P.M., Meier T., and King P. Segmentation, neurogenesis and formation of early axonal pathways in the centipede, Ethmostigmus rubripes (Brandt). Roux's Archives of Developmental Biology 199 (1991) 349-363