Appendage loss and regeneration in arthropods: A comparative view

Crustacea and Arthropod Relationships

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 215-245

  Maruzzo, Diego ^a   Bonato, Lucio ^a   Brena, Carlo ^a   Fusco, Giuseppe ^a   Minelli, Alessandro ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77955163962     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1201/9781420037548     Document Type: Chapter

References (140)

1. Abeloos, M. 1933. Sur la régénération des pattes chez le coléoptère Timarcha violaceo-nigra De Geer. C.R. hebdom. Séanc. Acad. Sci. Paris 113: 17-19.
2. Adiyodi, R.G. 1972. Wound healing and regeneration in the crab Paratelphusa hydrodromous [sic]. Int. Rev. Cyt. 32: 257-285.
3. Agar, W.E. 1930. A statistical study of regeneration in two species of Crustacea. J. Exp. Biol. 7: 349-369.
4. Ameer Hamsa, K.M.S. 1982. Observationts [sic!] on moulting of crab Portunus pelagicus Linnaeus reared in the laboratory. J. Mar. Biol. Ass. India 24: 69-71.
5. Bain, B.A. 2003. Postembryonic development in the pycnogonid Austropallene cornigera. Invertebr. Repr. Dev. 43: 181-192.
6. Bateson, W. 1894. Materials for the Study of Variation Treated with Especial Regard to Discontinuity in the Origin of Species. London: Macmillan.
7. Belozerov, V.N. 2001. Regeneration of limbs and sensory organs in ixodid ticks (Acari, Ixodoidea, Ixodidae and Argasidae). Russian J. Dev. Biol. 32: 129-142.
8. Bely, A.E. & Wray, G.A. 2001. Evolution of regeneration and fission in annelids: insights from engrailed- and orthodenticle-class gene expression. Development 128: 2781-2791.
9. Berrill, N.J. 1952. Regeneration and budding in worms. Biol. Rev. 27: 401-438.
10. Biggin, R.J. 1981. Pattern re-establishment - transplantation and regeneration of the leg in the cricket Teleogryllus commodus (Walker). J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 61: 87-101.
11. Bliss, D.E. 1960. Autotomy and regeneration. In: Waterman, T.H. (ed.), The Physiology of Crustacea, 1: 561-589. New York: Academy Press.
12. Bonnet, P. 1930. La mue, l’autotomie et la régénération chez les araignées avec une étude des Dolomès d’Europe. Bull. Soc. Hist. Nat. Toulouse 59: 237-700.
13. Bordage, E. 1905. Recherches anatomiques et biologiques sur l’anatomie et régénération chez diverses arthropodes. Bull. Sci. France Belgique 39: 307-454.
14. Bossuat, M. 1958. Territoire de régénération des antennes de l’isopode Idotea baltica (Aud.). C.R. hebdom. Séanc. Acad. Sci. Paris 246: 2530-2532.
15. Bourdon, J. 1937. Sur la régénération des ébauches de quelques organes imaginaux chez le coléoptère Timarcha goettingensis L. C.R. hebdom. Séanc. Acad. Sci. Paris 124: 872-874.
16. Boxshall, G.A. & Huys, R. 1998 The ontogeny and phylogeny of copepod antennules. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. B, 353: 765-786.
17. Brignoli, M.P. 1967. Su Opilioacarus italicus (With). Fragm. Entomol. 5: 111-121.
18. Brousse-Gaury, P. 1958. Contribution a l’étude de l’autotomie chez Acheta domestica L. Bull. Sci. France Belgique 92: 55-85.
19. Bullière, D. & Bullière, F. 1985. Regeneration. In: Kerkut, G.A. & Gilbert, L.I. (eds.), Comprehensive Insect Physiology, Biochemistry and Pharmacology, 2: 371-424. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
20. Calman, W.T. 1909. A Treatise on Zoölogy, Part 7, Appendiculata, 3rd Fascicle, Crustacea. London:Adam & Charles Black.
21. Cameron, J.A. 1926. Regeneration in Scutigera forceps. J. Exp. Zool. 46: 169-179.
22. Charniaux-Cotton, H. 1957. Croissance, régénération et déterminisme endocrinien des caractères sexuels d’Orchestia gammarella (Pallas) crustacé amphipode. Ann. Sci. Nat. Zool. Biol. Anim. 19: 413-559.
23. Child, C.M. & Young, A.N. 1903. Regeneration of appendages in nymphs of the Agrionidae. Arch. Entwicklungsmech. Organ. 15: 543-602.
24. Chopard, L. 1938. La Biologie des Orthoptères. Paris: Paul Lechevalier.
25. Clare, A., Lumb, G., Clare, P.A. & Costolow, J.D. 1990. A morphological study of wound response and telson regeneration in postlarval Limulus polyphemus (L.). Invertebr. Repr. Dev. 17: 77-87.
26. Cloudsley-Thompson, J.L. 1961. A new sound-producing mechanism in centipedes. Entomol. Monthly Mag. 96: 110-113.
27. Coineau, Y. & Legendre, R. 1975. Sur un mode de régénération che les Arthropodes: la régénération des pattes marcheuses che les Opilioacarines (Acari: Notostigmata). C.R. hebdom. Séanc. Acad. Sci. Paris, Sér. D, Sci. Nat., 280: 41-43.
28. Condé, B. 1955. Matériaux pour une monographie des Diploures Campodéidés. Mém. Mus. Nat. Hist. Nat. Paris, Sér. A: Zool., 12: 1-201.
29. Darwin, C. 1854. A monograph on the sub-class Cirripedia. London: Ray Society.
30. Degrange, C. & Seassau, M. 1974. Sur la régénération du masque (= labium) des larves des odonates anisoptéres Anax imperator Leach et Aeschna cyanea (Müller). C.R. hebdom. Séanc. Acad. Sci. Paris, Sér. D: Sci. Nat., 278: 281-284.
31. Dehorne, L. 1916. Les naïdimorphes et leur reproduction asexuée. Arch. Zool. Exp. Gén. 56: 25-157.
32. Desai, U.M. & Achuthankutty, C.T. 2000. Complete regeneration of ablated eyestalk in penaeid prawn, Penaeus monodon. Curr. Sci. 79: 1602-1603.
33. Dixey, L. 1938. Effects of repeated regeneration of the antenna in Gammarus chevreuxi. Proc. Zool. Soc. London 108: 289-296.
34. Dixon, K.A. 1989. Effect of leg type and sex on autotomy in the Texas bush katydid, Scudderia texensis. Can. J. Zool. 67: 1607-1609.
35. Dohrn, A. 1881. Die Pantopoden des Golfes von Neapel. Fauna und Flora des Golfes von Neapel, Monographie 3.
36. Edwards, J.S. 1972. Limb loss and regeneration in two crabs: the king crab Paralithodes camtschatica and the tanner crab Chionoecetes bairdi. Acta Zool. 53: 105-112.
37. Enghoff, H., Dohle, W. & Blower, J.G. 1993. Anamorphosis in millipedes (Diplopoda). The present state of knowledge and phylogenetic considerations. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 109: 103-234.
38. Ernsting, G. & Fokkema, D.S. 1983. Antennal damage and regeneration in springtails (Collembola) in relation to predation. Netherl. J. Zool. 33 (4): 476-484.
39. Gaubert, P. 1892. Autotomie chez les Pycnogonides. Bull. Soc. Zool. France 17: 224-225.
40. Godelmann, R. 1901. Beiträge zur Kenntnis von Bacillus Rossii Fabr. Mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der bei ihm vorkommenden Autotomie und Regeneration einzelner Gliedmassen. Arch. Entwicklungsmech. Organ. 12: 265-301.
41. Govind, C.K. & Read, A.T. 1994. Regenerate limb bud sufficient for claw reversal in adult snapping shrimps. Biol. Bull. 186: 241-246.
42. Graber, V. 1874. Ueber eine Art fibrilloiden Bindengewebes der Insektenhaut und seine lokale Bedeutung als Tracheensuspensorium. Arch. Mikrosk. Anat. 10.
43. Hartnoll, R.G. 1988. Growth and molting. In: Burgreen, W.W. & McMahon, B.R. (eds.), Biology of Land Crabs: 186-210. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
44. Herbst, C. 1891. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Chilopoden. Bibl. Zool. 3: 1-42.
45. Herlant-Meewis, H. 1953. Contribution à l’étude de la régénération chez les oligochètes Aeolosomatidae. Ann. Soc. R. Zool. Belg. 84: 117-161.
46. Hopkins, P.M. 1985. Regeneration and relative growth in the fiddler crab. Crustacean Issues 3: 265-275.
47. Hopkins, P.M. 1993. Regeneration of the walking legs in the fiddler crab Uca pugilator. Am. Zool. 33: 348-356.
48. Huber, F. 1987. Plasticity in the auditory system of crickets: phonotaxis with one ear and neuronal reorganization within the auditory pathway. J. Comp. Physiol. 161: 583-604.
49. Igelmund, P. 1987. Morphology, sense organs, and regeneration of the forelegs (whips) of the whip spider Heterophrynus elaphus (Arachnida, Amblypygi). J. Morphol. 193: 75-89.
50. Juanes, F. & Smith, D.L. 1995. The ecological consequences of limb damage and loss in decapod crustaceans: a review and prospectus. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 193: 197-223.
51. Kaars, C., Greenblatt, S. & Fourtner, C.R. 1984. Patterned regeneration of internal femoral structures in the cockroach, Periplaneta americana L. J. Exp. Biol. 230: 141-144.
52. Kaestner, A. 1968. Invertebrate Zoology, 2. New York, London, Sidney: Interscience Publishers.
53. Klepal, W. & Barnes, H. 1974. Regeneration of the penis in Balanus balanoides (L.). J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 16: 205-211.
54. Klingenberg, C.P. & Nijhout, H.F. 1998. Competition among growing organs and developmental control of morphological asymmetry. Proc. Zool. Soc. London, Ser. B, 265: 1135-1139.
55. Knoflach, B. & van Harten, A. 2000. Palpal loss, single palp copulation and obligatory mate consumption in Tidarren cuneolatum (Tullgren, 1910) (Araneae, Theridiidae). J. Nat. Hist. 34: 1639-1659.
56. Kocian, V. 1930. Un cas d’hétéromorphose chez Argulus foliaceus L. Arch. Zool. Exp. Gén. 70: 23-27.
57. Kopeć, S. 1913. Untersuchungen über die Regeneration von Larvalorganen und Imaginalscheiben bei Schmetterlingen. Arch. Entwicklungsmech. Organ. 37: 440-472.
58. Lakes, R. & Mücke, A. 1989. Regeneration of the foreleg tibia and tarsi of Ephippiger ephippiger (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae). J. Exp. Zool. 250: 176-187.
59. Larink, O. 1983. Regeneration des Sensillenmusters der Labialpalpen bei Lepismatidae (Insecta:Zygentoma). Verh. Deutsch. Zool. Ges. 1983: 302.
60. Lawrence, R.F. 1953. The Biology of the Cryptic Fauna of Forest, with Special Reference to the Indigenous Forest of South Africa. Cape Town, Amsterdam: A.A. Balkema.
61. Lewis, J.G.E. 1968. Individual variations in a population of the centipede Scolopendra amazonica from Nigeria and its implications for methods of taxonomic discrimination in Scolopendridae. J. Linn. Soc. London, Zool., 47: 315-326.
62. Lewis, J.G.E. 2000. Centipede antennal characters in taxonomy with particular reference to scolopendromorphs and antennal development in pleurostigmomorphs (Myriapoda, Chilopoda). In: Wytwer, J. & Golovatch, S. (eds.), Progress in Studies on Myriapoda and Onychophora. Fragm. Faun. Warszawa 43 (suppl.): 87-96.
63. Lüscher, M. 1948. The regeneration of legs in Rhodnius prolixus (Hemiptera). J. Exp. Biol. 25: 334-343.
64. Mariappan, P., Balasundaram, C. & Schmitz, B. 2000. Decapod crustacean chelipeds: an overview. J. Bioscience 25: 301-313.
65. McConaugha, J.R. 1991. Limb regeneration in juveniles of the mud crab Rhithropanopeus harrisii following removal of developing limb buds. J. Exp. Zool. 257: 64-69.
66. Megušar, F. 1907. Die Regeneration der Koleopteren. Arch. Entwicklungsmech. Organ. 26: 148-234.
67. Mellon, D. & Tewari, M.K. 2000. Heteromorphic antennules protect the olfactory midbrain from atrophy following chronic antennular ablation in freshwater crayfish. J. Exp. Zool. 286: 90-96.
68. Mikulska, I., Jacuński, L. & Weychert, K. 1975. The regeneration of appendages in Tegenaria artica C.L. Koch (Agelenidae, Araneae). Zool. Poloniae 25: 99-109.
69. Minelli, A. 2000. Limbs and tail as evolutionarily diverging duplicates of the main body axis. Evol. Dev. 2: 157-165.
70. Minelli, A. 2003a. The origin and evolution of appendages. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 47: 573-581.
71. Minelli, A. 2003b. The Development of Animal Form. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
72. Minelli, A., Foddai, D., Pereira, L.A. & Lewis, J.G.E. 2000. The evolution of segmentation of centipede trunk and appendages. J. Zool. Syst. Evol. Res. 38: 103-117.
73. Morgan, T.H. 1920. Variations in the secondary sexual characters of the fiddler crab. Am. Nat. 54: 220-246.
74. Morgan, T.H. 1923. The development of asymmetry in the fiddler crab. Am. Nat. 57: 269-273.
75. Murakami, Y. 1958. The life history of Bothropolys asperatus Koch. Zool. Mag. Tokyo 67: 217-223 [in Japanese, with English summary].
76. Mykles, D.L. 2001. Interactions between limb regeneration and molting in decapod crustaceans. Am. Zool. 41: 399-406.
77. Myles, T.G. 1986. Evidence of parental and/or sibling manipulation in three species of termites in Hawaii (Isoptera). Proc. Hawai. Entomol. Soc. 27: 129-136.
78. Needham, A.E. 1947. Local factors and regeneration in Crustacea. J. Exp. Biol. 24: 220-226.
79. Needham, A.E. 1965. Regeneration in the Arthropoda and its endocrine control. In: Kiortsis, V. & Trampusch, H.A.L. (eds.), Regeneration in Animals and Related Problems: 283-323. Amsterdam:North-Holland Publ. Comp.
80. Newport, G. 1844. On the reproduction of lost part in Myriapoda and Insecta. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. London 1844: 283-294.
81. Nijhout, H.F. & Emlen, D.J. 1998. Competition among body parts in the development and evolution of insect morphology. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. Un. St. 95: 3685-3689.
82. Nilsson, C. 1986. The occurrence of lost and malformed legs in mayfly nymphs as a result of predator attacks. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 23: 57-60.
83. Niwa, K. & Kurata, H. 1964. Limb loss and regeneration in the adult king crab Paralithodes camtschatica. Bull. Hokkaido Reg. Fish. Res. Lab. 28: 51-55.
84. Norbeck, B.A. & Denburg, J.L. 1991. Pattern formation during insect leg segmentation: studies with a prepattern of a cell surface antigen. Roux’s Arch. Dev. Biol. 199: 476-491.
85. Noulin, G. 1962. Contribution à l’étude d’un plan de rupture et des mécanismes d’amputation des appendices ches les Oniscoïdes (Crustacés Isopodes). 87 Congrès des Sociétés Savantes, Limoges:1159-1163.
86. Noulin, G. 1984. Morphogenèse régénératrice chez les Crustacé Isopode Porcellio dilatatus: histologie et cytologie, interactions avec la mue, formations surnuméraires. Thèse de Doctorat d’État, Université de Poitiers.
87. Nouvel-van Rysselberge, L. 1937. Contribution à l’étude de la mue, de la croissance et de la régénération chez les Crustacés Natantia. Rec. Inst. Zool. Torley-Rousseau, Bruxelles, 6: 5-161.
88. Patay, R. 1937. Sur la régénération des pattes chez le coléoptère chrysomélide Leptinotarsa decemlineata Say. C.R. hebdom. Séanc. Acad. Sci. Paris, Sér. D, Sci. Nat., 126: 283-285.
89. Paulian, R. 1938. Contribution à l’étude quantitative de la régeneration chex les Arthropodes. Proc. Zool. Soc. London, Ser. A, 108: 297-383.
90. Penzlin, H. 1963. Über die Regeneration bei Schaben (Blattaria). I. Das Regenerationsvermögen und die Genese des Regenerats. W. Roux’s Arch. Entwicklungsmech. Organ. 154: 434-465.
91. Pisani, D., Poling, L.L., Lyons-Weiler, M. & Hedges, S.B. 2004. The colonization of land by animals:molecular phylogeny and divergence times among arthropods. BMC Biology 2004, 2: 1. On-line available at: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7007/2/1.
92. Poisson, R. & Patay, R. 1938. Sur quelques modalités de la régénération des pattes et des ailes chez la larve du doryphore: Leptinotarsa decemlineata Say. C.R. hebdom. Séanc. Acad. Sci. Paris 129: 126-128.
93. Przibram, H. 1909. Regeneration. Leipzig, Wien: Franz Deuticke.
94. Przibram, H. & Werber, E.J. 1907. Regenerationsversuche allgemeiner Bedeutung bei Borstenschwänzen (Lepismatidae). Arch. Entwicklungsmech. Organ. 27: 615-631.
95. Rabes, O. 1907. Regeneration der Schwanzfäden bei Apus cancriformis. Zool. Anz. 24: 753-755.
96. Racovitza, E. 1925. Notes sur les Isopodes. 13. Morphologie et phylogénie des antennes II, Le fouet. Arch. Zool. Éxp. Gén. 63: 533-622.
97. Randall, J.B. 1981. Regeneration and autotomy exhibited by the black widow spider, Latrodectus variolus Walckenaer. W. Roux’s Arch. Dev. Biol. 190: 230-232.
98. Read, A.T. & Govind, C.K. 1997a. Regeneration and sex-biased transformation of the sexually dimorphic pincer claw in adult snapping shrimps. J. Exp. Zool. 279: 356-366.
99. Read, A.T. & Govind, C.K. 1997b. Claw transformation and regeneration in adult snapping shrimp:test of the inhibition hypothesis for maintaining bilateral asymmetry. Biol. Bull. 193: 401-409.
100. Rockett, C.L. & Woodring, J.P. 1972. Comparative studies of acarine limb regeneration, apolysis, and ecdysis. J. Insect Physiol. 18: 2319-2336.
101. Rogers, D.C. 2001. Revision of the Nearctic Lepidurus (Notostraca). J. Crust. Biol. 21: 911-1006.
102. Rościszewska, M. & Urvoy, J. 1989a. Contribution à l’étude de la régénération d’appendices chez Gryllus domesticus L. (Orthoptera), I, Étude de la régénération de l’antenne. Acta Biol. Cracov., Ser. Zool., 31: 125-135.
103. Rościszewska, M. & Urvoy, J. 1989b. Contribution à l’étude de la régénération d’appendices chez Gryllus domesticus L. (Orthoptera), II, Étude de la régénération des pattes. Acta Biol. Cracov., Ser. Zool., 31: 136-143.
104. Rosin, R. 1964. On regeneration in scorpions. Israel J. Zool. 13: 177-183.
105. Roth, V.D. & Roth, M.R. 1984. A review of appendotomy in spiders and other arachnids. Bull. Brit. Arachnol. Soc. 6: 137-146.
106. Sánchez Alvarado, A. 2000. Regeneration in the metazoans: why does it happen? BioEssays 22: 578-590.
107. Schafer, R. 1973. Postembryonic development in the antenna of the cockroach, Leucophaea maderae:growth, regeneration and the development of the adult pattern of sense organs. J. Exp. Zool. 183: 353-364.
108. Scheffel, H. 1987. Häutungsphysiologie der Chilopoden: Ergebnisse von Untersuchungen an Lithobius forficatus (L.). Zool. Jahrb., Abt. Allgem. Zool. Physiol. Tiere, 91: 257-282.
109. Scheffel, H. 1989. Zur wechselseitigen Beeinflussung von Regeneration und Häutung bei Larven des Chilopoden Lithobius forficatus (L.). Zool. Jahrb., Abt. Allgem. Zool. Physiol. Tiere, 93: 436-505.
110. Schindler, G. 1979. Funktionsmorphologische Untersuchungen zur Autotomie der Stabheuschrecke Carausius morosus Br. (Insecta: Phasmida). Zool. Anz. 303: 316-326.
111. Schlichting, C.D. & Pigliucci, M. 1998. Phenotypic evolution: a reaction-norm perspective. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer.
112. Shaw, V.K. & Bryant, P.J. 1974. Regeneration of appendages in the large milkweed bag, Oncopeltus fasciatus. J. Insect Physiol. 20: 1849-1857.
113. Skinner, D.M. 1985. Molting and regeneration. In: Bliss, D.E. & Mantel, L.H. (eds.), The Biology of Crustacea, 9: 43-146. New York: Academic Press.
114. Spivak, E.D. & Politis, M.A. 1989. High incidence of limb autotomy in a crab population from a coastal lagoon in the province of Buenos Aires, Argentina. Can. J. Zool. 67: 1976-1985.
115. Sweetman, H.L. 1934. Regeneration of appendages and molting among the Thysanura. Bull. Brooklyn Entomol. Soc. 29: 158-161.
116. Tanaka, A., Akahane, H. & Ban, Y. 1992. The problem of the number of tarsomeres in the regenerated cockroach leg. J. Exp. Zool. 262: 61-70.
117. Toyota, K., Yamauchi, T. & Miyajima, T. 2003. A marking method of cutting uropods using malformed regeneration for kuruma prawn Marsupenaeus japonicus. Fisheries Science, 69, 161-169.
118. Truby, P.R. 1985. Separation of wound healing from regeneration in the cockroach leg. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 85: 177-190.
119. Urvoy, J. 1963. Étude anatomo-functionelle de la patte et de l’antenne de la blatte Blabera craniifer B. Ann. Sci. Nat. Zool. Biol. Anim. 12: 287-413.
120. Urvoy, J. 1970. Étude des phénomènes de régénération après section d’antenne chez le phasme Sypyloidea sypylus W. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 23: 719-728.
121. Urvoy, J. & Les Bris, R. 1968. Étude de la régénération des cerques, des palpes labiaux et des palpes maxillaires chez Blabera craniifer (Orth. Blattidae). Ann. Soc. Entomol. France 4: 371-383.
122. Vachon, M. 1956. Remarques sur la morphogenèse au cours de la régénération des pattes ches les araignées. Proceedings of the XIV International Congress of Zoology, Copenhagen, 1953.
123. Vachon, M. 1957. La régénération appendiculaire chez les scorpions (Arachnides). C.R. hebdom. Séanc. Acad. Sci. Paris 244: 2556-2559.
124. Vachon, M. 1967. Nouvelles remarques sur la régénération des pattes chez l’araignée: Coelotes terrestris Wid. (Agelenidae). Bull. Soc. Zool. France 92: 417-428.
125. Verhoeff, K.W. 1902-1925. Chilopoda. In: H.G. Bronn’s Klassen und Ordnungen des Tier-Reichs, 5 (2): 1-725. Leipzig: C.F. Winter.
126. Vernet, G. & Charmantier-Daures, M. 1994. Mue, autotomie et régénération. In: Grassé, P.P. (ed.), Traité de Zoologie, Tome 7, Fascicule 1: 153-194. Paris: Masson.
127. Vitzthum, G. 1943. Acarina. In: H. G. Bronn’s Klassen und Ordnungen des Tier-Reichs, Bd. 5, Abt. 4, Buch 5: 1-1011. Leipzig: C.F. Winter.
128. Vollrath, F. 1990. Leg regeneration in web spider and its implications for orb spider exploration and web-building behaviour. Bull. British Arachnol. Soc. 8: 177-184.
129. Vollrath, F. 1995. Lyriform organs on regenerated spider legs. Bull. British Arachnol. Soc. 10: 115-118.
130. von Buddenbrock, W. 1954. Physiologie der Decapoden. Die Regeneration. In: H.G. Bronn’s Klassen und Ordnungen des Tier-Reichs, Bd. 5, Abt. 1, Buch 7, Lfg. 9: 1231-1246. Leipzig: Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft.
131. Walossek, D. & Müller, K.J. 1997. Cambrian ‘Orsten’-type arthropods and the phylogeny of Crustacea. In: Fortey, R.A. & Thomas, R.H. (eds.), Arthropod Relationships: 139-153. London: Chapman & Hall.
132. Wege, W. 1911. Morphologische und experimentelle Studien an Asellus aquaticus. Zool. Jahrb., Abt. Allgem. Zool. Physiol. Tiere, 30: 217-320.
133. Weis, J.S. 1982. Studies on limb regeneration in the anomuran Pagurus longicarpus and Emerita talpoidea. J. Crust. Biol. 2: 227-231.
134. Weise, R. 1991. Regeneration of antennae in the third larvae of Lithobius forficatus. Zool. Anz. 227: 343-355.
135. Weygoldt, P. 1984. L’autotomie chez les Amblypyges. Rev. Arachnol. 5: 321-327.
136. Wolsky, A. 1957. “Compensatory hyper-regeneration” in antennae of Hemiptera. Nature 180: 1144-1145.
137. Wood, F.D. 1926. Autotomy in Arachnida. J. Morphol. Physiol. 42: 143-195.
138. Wood, F.D. & Wood, H.E. 1932. Autotomy in decapod Crustacea. J. Exp. Zool. 62: 1-55.
139. Wygodzinsky, P. 1941. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Dipluren und Thysanuren der Schweiz. Denkschr. Schweiz. Naturf. Ges. 74: 113-227.
140. Yamaguchi, T. 2001. Dimorphism of chelipeds in the fiddler crab, Uca arcuata. Crustaceana 74: 913-923.