Analyzing opportunities for using interactive augmented prototyping in design practice

Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing: AIEDAM

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 289-303

  Verlinden, Jouke ^a   Horvth, Imre ^a  

^a FACULTY OF INDUSTRIAL DESIGN ENGINEERING   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Augmented reality; Case study; Design process; Prototyping; Tangible user interfaces

Indexed keywords

AUGMENTED REALITY TECHNOLOGY; AUTOMOTIVE DESIGNS; BEST PRACTICE; CASE STUDY; COMMUNICATION ACTIVITIES; CURRENT PRACTICES; DESIGN PRACTICE; DESIGN PROCESS; DESIGN REVIEW; DIFFERENT DOMAINS; DIGITAL REPRESENTATIONS; GROUP ACTIVITIES; INDUSTRIAL DESIGN; INFORMATION APPLIANCES; INTERIOR DESIGNS; PHYSICAL PROTOTYPING; PROTOTYPING; TANGIBLE OBJECTS; TANGIBLE USER INTERFACES; USAGE SCENARIOS;

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN; AUGMENTED REALITY; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; RESEARCH; USER INTERFACES; VIRTUAL REALITY;

PRODUCT DESIGN;

EID: 68349125687     PISSN: 08900604     EISSN: 14691760     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0890060409000250     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Bandyopadhyay, D., Raskar, R., & Fuchs, H. (2001). Dynamic Shader Lamps. Proc. Painting on Movable Objects Int. Symp. Augmented Reality (ISMAR), pp. 207-216.
2. Bimber, O. (2002). Interactive rendering for projection-based augmented reality displays. PhD Dissertation. Darmstadt University of Technology.
3. Bimber, O., & Raskar, R. (2005). Spatial Augmented Reality: Merging Real and Virtual Worlds. Wellesley, MA: A.K. Peters, Ltd.
4. Brereton, M., & McGarry, B. (2000). An observational study of how objects support engineering design thinking and communication: implications for the design of tangible media. Proc. CHI '00, pp. 217-224.
5. Broek, J.J., Sleijffers, W., Horváth, I., & Lennings, A.F. (2000). Using physical models in design. Proc. CAID/CD '00, pp. 155-163.
6. Dourish, P. (2001). Where the Action Is: The Foundations of Embodied Interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. Engelbrektsson, P., & Söderman, M.P. (2004). The use and perception of methods and product representations in product development: a survey of Swedish industry. Journal of Engineering Design 15(2), 141-154.
8. Geuer, A. (1996). Einsatzpotential des Rapid Prototyping in der Produktent-wickelung. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
9. Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Chicago: Aldine.
10. Huang, C.-J, Do, E.Y.-L., & Gross, M.D. (2003). MouseHaus Table, a physical interface for urban design. Adjunct Proc. UIST '03, pp. 41-42.
11. Horacek, H. (2003). From arguments to hints - a didactic perspective on deductive reasoning. Proc. 3rd Workshop on Computational Models of Natural Argument.
12. Huet, G., Culley, S.J., McMahon, C.A., & Fortin, C. (2007). Making sense of engineering design review activities. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 21(3), 243-266.
13. Jackson, M. (2000). Systems Approaches to Management. New York: Kluwer/Plenum.
14. Kim, C., Park, J., Yi, J., & Turk, M. (2005). Structured light based depth edge detection for object shape recovery. Proc. Workshop on Projector-Camera Systems.
15. Kohlas, J., Monney, P.A., Haenni, R., & Lehmann, N. (1995). Model-based diagnostics using hints. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 946, pp. 259-266. London: Springer.
16. McGarry, B. (2005). Things to think with: understanding interactions with artefacts in engineering design. PhD Thesis. University of Queensland, School of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering.
17. Mobach, M.P.A. (2007). Critical systems perspective on the design of organizational space systems. Research and Behavioural Science 24, 69-90.
18. Nam, T.-J., & Lee, W. (2003). Integrating hardware and software: augmented reality based prototyping method for digital products. Proc. CHI '03, pp. 956-957.
19. Rauterberg, M., Fjeld, M., Krueger, H., Bichsel, M., Leonhardt, U., & Meier, M. (1998). BUILD-IT: a planning tool for construction and design [video]. Proc. CHI '98, pp. 177-178.
20. Stevens, B. (2002). Physically augmenting reality: human-computer interaction with projection-augmented models. PhD Thesis. University of Portsmouth.
21. Tovey, M. (1997). Styling and design: intuition and analysis in industrial design. Design Studies 18, 5-31.
22. Tsang, M., Fitzmaurice, G.F., Kurtenbach, G., Khan, A., & Buxton, B. (2002). Boomchameleon: simultaneous captureof3Dviewpoint, voiceand gesture annotations on a spatially-aware display. Proc. UIST '02, pp. 111-120.
23. Underkoffler, J., & Ishii, H. (1999). Urp: a luminous-tangible workbench for urban planning and design. Proc. CHI '99, pp. 386-393.
24. Verlinden, J., & Horvath, I. (2006). Framework for testing and validating interactive augmented prototyping as a design means in industrial practice. In Research in Interactive Design (Fischer, X., & Coutellier, D., Eds.), Vol. 2. Berlin: Springer.
25. Verlinden, J., & Horvath, I. (2007). A critical systems position on augmented prototyping systems for industrial design. Proc. ASME-CIE '07, Paper No. DETC2007-35642.
26. Verlinden, J., Horvath, I., & Edelenbos, E. (2006). Treatise of technologies for interactive augmented prototyping. Proc. Tools and Methods of Competitive Engineering 2006, pp. 523-536.
27. Verlinden, J., Suurmeijer, C., & Horvath, I. (2007). Which prototype to augment? A retrospective case study on industrial and user interface design. Proc. HCI Int., Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 4563, pp. 574-583. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
28. Yang, M.Y. (2004). An examination of prototyping and design outcome. Proc. DETC '04, Paper No. DETC2004-57552.
29. Yin, R. (1988). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. London: Sage.