An examination of prototyping and design outcome

Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference

Volumn 3, Issue , 2004, Pages 497-502

  Yang, Maria C ^a  

^a University of Southern California   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CASTING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CURRICULA; ELECTROMECHANICAL DEVICES; ENGINEERING EDUCATION; MACHINING; MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; RAPID PROTOTYPING; RISK ASSESSMENT; STUDENTS; THREE DIMENSIONAL; PRODUCT DESIGN;

DESIGN PROCESS; ENGINEERING FABRICATION; PRODUCTION TECHNOLOGIES; THREE-DIMENSIONAL (3-D) PROTOTYPING DESIGN; DESIGN OUTCOMES; DESIGN SUCCESS; PRODUCT DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT PROCESS; PROJECT CYCLE; RESEARCH QUESTIONS; SIMPLE++; TIME-SPENT;

PRODUCT DESIGN; CURRICULA;

EID: 14044260710     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1115/detc2004-57552     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Houde, S. and C. Hill, What do Prototypes Prototype?, in Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction, M. Helander, T. Landauer, and P. Prabhu, Editors. 1997, Elsevier Science: Amsterdam.
2. Ward, A., et al., The Second Toyota Paradox: How Delaying Decisions Can Make Better Cars Faster. Sloan Management Review, 1995. 36(3): p. 43-61.
3. Schrage, M. and T. Peters, Serious Play: How the World's Best Companies Simulate to Innovate. 1999, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
4. Kolodner, J.L. and L.M. Wills, Powers of observation in creative design. Design Studies, 1996. 17(4): p. 385-416.
5. Ullman, D.G., S. Wood, and D. Craig, The Importance of Drawing in the Mechanical Design Process. Computers & Graphics, 1990. 14(2): p. 263-274.
6. Goel, V., Sketches of thought. 1995, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, xv, 279.
7. Suwa, M. and B. Tversky, What Do Architects and Students Perceive in their Design Sketches? A Protocol Analysis. Design Studies, 1997. 18(4): p. 385-403.
8. Kiefer, S., L. Silverberg, and M. Gonzalez, A case study of prototyping methods and design for manufacture: electrostatic window blinds. Journal of Engineering Design, 2004. 15(1): p. 91 - 106.
9. Sommerville, I., Software Engineering. Fifth ed. 1995: Addison-Wesley.
10. Petroski, H., Invention by Design: How Engineers Get From Thought to Thing. 1996, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
11. Budde, R., K. Kautz, and K. Kuhlenkamp, Prototyping: An Approach to Evolutionary System Development. 1992, Berlin: Springer.
12. Dijk, L., J.S.M. Vergeest, and I. Horváth, Testing shape manipulation tools using abstract prototypes. Design Studies, 1998. 19(2): p. 187-201.
13. Wagner, A., Prototyping: A Day in the Life of an Interface Designer, in The Art of Human Computer Interface Design, B. Laurel, Editor. 1990, Addison-Wesley: New York. p. 79-84.
14. Mabogunje, A. and L. Leifer. 210-NP: Measuring the Mechanical Engineering Design Process, in Twenty-Sixth Annual Frontiers in Education Conference on Technology-Based Re-Engineering Engineering Education. 1996. Salt Lake City, UT.
15. Dong, A., A.W. Hill, and A.M. Agogino, A Document Analysis Method for Characterizing Team-Based Design Outcomes. Journal of Mechanical Design (in press), 2004.
16. Yang, M.C. Concept Generation and Sketching: Correlations with Design Outcome, in 2003 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences. 2003. Chicago, IL: ASME.
17. Siegel, S., Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. McGraw-Hill Series in Psychology, ed. C.T. Morgan. 1956, New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. 312.
18. Kuffner, T.A. and D.G. Ullman, The information requests of mechanical design engineers. Design Studies, 1991. 12(1): p. 42-50.
19. Baya, V. and L.J. Leifer. A Study of the Information Handling Behavior of Designers During Conceptual Design, in Sixth International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology. 1994. Minneapolis, MN: American Society of Mechanical Engineers.