The use and perception of methods and product representations in product development: A survey of Swedish industry

Journal of Engineering Design

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 141-154

  Engelbrektsson, Pontus ^a   Söderman, Mikael ^a  

^a CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CUSTOMER ORIENTATIONS; PRODUCT REPRESENTATION;

COMPETITION; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; CUSTOMER SATISFACTION; PRODUCT DESIGN; QUALITY CONTROL; RAPID PROTOTYPING;

PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 11144353983     PISSN: 09544828     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09544820310001641245     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Alba, J.W., 1980, The effects of product knowledge on the comprehension, retention and evaluation of product information. Advances in Consumer Research, 10, 577-580.
2. Andreasen, M.M., and Hein, L., 1987, Integrated Product Development (Berlin: Springer-Verlag).
3. Araujo, C.S., and Benetto-Neto, H., 1996, The utilization of product development methods: a survey of UK industry. Journal of Engineering Design, 7, 265-278.
4. Assael, H., 1995, Consumer Behaviour and Marketing Action, 5th edition (Cincinnati, Ohio: Southwestern College Publishing).
5. Bont de, C.J.P.M., 1992, Consumer evaluations of early product concepts. Doctoral Thesis, Delft University Press, The Netherlands.
6. Carlsson, M., 1990, Integration of technical functions for increased efficiency in the product development process. Dissertation, Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg, Sweden.
7. Catteral, M., and MacLaran, P. 1997, Focus group data and qualitative analysis programs: coding the moving picture as well as the snapshots. Sociological Research Online, 2(1), www.socresonline.org.uk.
8. Cooper, R.G., and Kleinschmidt, E.J., 1987, What makes a new product a winner: success factors at the project level. R & D Management, 17(3), 175-189.
9. Cooper, R.G., 1999, From experience: the invisible success factors in product innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 16, 115-133.
10. Dahan, E., and Srinivasan, V., 2000, The predictive power of internet-based product concept testing using visual depiction and animation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 17, 99-109.
11. Dickinson, J.R., and Wilby, C.P., 1997, Concept testing with and without product trial. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 14, 117-125.
12. Ealy, L., and Soderberg, L.G., 1990, How Honda cures design amnesia. The McKinley Quarterly (Spring), 3-14.
13. Finn, A., 1985, A theory of the consumer evaluation process for new product concepts. Research in Consumer Behaviour, 1, 35-65.
14. Goffin, K., 1998, Evaluating customer support during new product development - an explanatory study. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 15(1), 42-56.
15. Griffin, A., and Hauser, J.R., 1993, The voice of the customer, Marketing Science, 12(1, Winter).
16. Holbrook, M.B., and Moore, W.L., 1981, Feature interactions in consumer judgements of verbal versus pictorial presentations, Journal of Consumer Research, 8, 103-113.
17. Hsia, P., Davies, A., and Kung, D., 1993, Status report: requirements engineering. IEE Software (Nov.), 75-79.
18. Jordan, P.W., 1998, An Introduction to Usability (London: Taylor & Francis Ltd.), ISBN 0-7484-0762-6.
19. Karlsson, M., 1996, User requirements elicitation: a framework for the study of the relation between user and the artefact. Doctoral Thesis, Dept. of Consumer Technology, Chalmers University of Technology, Güteborg, Sweden.
20. Kaulio, M., 1997, Customer-focused product development: a practice-centered perspective. Doctoral Thesis, Dept. Consumer Technology, Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg, Sweden.
21. Kaulio, M., and Karlsson, I.C.M., 1998, Triangulation strategies in user requirements investigations: a case study on the development of an IT-mediated service. Behaviour and Information Technology, 17(2), 103-112.
22. Leonard-Barton, D., 1991, Inanimate integrators: a block of wood speaks. Design Management Journal (Summer), 61-67.
23. Leonard, D., and Rayport, J.F., 1997, Spark innovation through empathic design. Harward Business Review (November-December), 102-113.
24. Louviere, J.J., 1987, Do the parameters of choice models depend on differences in stimulus presentation: visual versus verbal presentations. Advances in Consumer Research, 14, 79-82.
25. Loosschilder, G., 1994, The effect of the realism of product representations on the validity of consumer evaluations. 47th ESOMAR Research Congress, 11-17 September 1994, Seattle, WA, USA.
26. Mahajan, V., and Wind, J., 1992, New product models: practice, shortcomings and desired improvements. Journal of Product Innovations Management, 9, 128-139.
27. Rosengren, K.E., 1975, Sociologisk metodik, 2nd edition (Solna, Sweden: Scandinavian University Books), ISBN 91-24-69662-5.
28. Rydebrink, P., Kaulio, M., Karlsson, M.A., and Dahlman, S. (1995), Product requirements engineering-PRE. Att hantera kundkrav i utvecklingsarbetet. Report 95011, IVF and Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg, Sweden (in Swedish only).
29. Schrage, M., 1993, The cultures of prototyping. Design Management Journal, (Winter), 55-65.
30. Söderman, M., 1998, Tools for creating understanding and an integrated dialogue in the early stages of product design. 2nd International Conference on Engineering Design and Automation, Wailea Resort, Maui, USA, August 9-12, 1998.
31. Ullman, D.G., 1992, The Mechanical Design Process (Singapore: McGraw-Hill).
32. Ulrich, K.T., and Eppinger, S.D., 1995, Product Design and Development (McGraw-Hill Book, Inc.).
33. Wheelwright, S.C., and Clark, K.B., 1992, Revolutionizing Product Development (NY, USA: The Free Press).
34. Wheelwright, S.C., and Clark, K.B., 1994, Accelerating the design-build-test cycle for effective product development. International Marketing Review, 11(1), 32-46.
35. Wilson, J., and Corlett, N., 1995, Evaluation of Human Work A Practical Ergonomics Methodology, second edition (London, UK: Taylor & Francis).
36. Wixon, D., Holtzblatt, K., and Knox, S., 1990, Conceptual design: an emergent view of system design, In CHI'90 Proceedings, Seattle, WA, USA, pp. 329-336.