Inertia and management accounting change: The role of ambiguity and contradiction between formal rules and routines

Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal

Volumn 22, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 736-761

  van der Steen, Martijn ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Change management; Inertia; Management accounting; Role ambiguity; The Netherlands

Indexed keywords

EID: 68349108112     PISSN: 09513574     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/09513570910966351     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Balogun, J. and Johnson, G. (2004), Organizational restructuring and middle manager sensemaking, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 47 No. 4, pp. 523-49.
2. Barley, R.S. and Tolbert, S.P. (1997), Institutionalization and structuration: studying the links between action and institution, Organization Studies, Vol. 18 No. 1, pp. 93-117.
3. Barnes, W., Gartland, M. and Stack, M. (2004), Old habits die hard: path dependency and behavioral lock-in, Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. 38 No. 2, pp. 371-7.
4. Becker, M.C. (2004), Organizational routines: a review of the literature, Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 13 No. 4, pp. 643-77.
5. Becker, M.C. (2005), A framework for applying organizational routines in empirical research: linking antecedents, characteristics and performance outcomes of recurrent interaction patterns, Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 14 No. 5, pp. 817-46.
6. Becker, M.C. and Knudsen, T. (2004), The role of routines in reducing pervasive uncertainty, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 58 No. 6, pp. 746-57.
7. Birnberg, J.G. and Shields, M.D. (1984), The role of attention and memory in accounting decisions, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 9 Nos 3/4, pp. 365-82.
8. Brignall, S. and Modell, S. (2000), An institutional perspective on performance measurement and management in the 'new public sector', Management Accounting Research, Vol. 11 No. 3, pp. 281-306.
9. Burns, J.E. and Scapens, R.W. (2000), Conceptualising management accounting change: an institutional framework, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 11 No. 1, pp. 3-25.
10. Busco, C., Riccaboni, A. and Scapens, R.W. (2006), Trust for accounting and accounting for trust, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 17 No. 1, pp. 11-41.
11. Choo, F. (1989), Cognitive scripts in auditing and accounting behaviour, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 14 Nos 5/6, pp. 481-93.
12. Choo, F. (1996), Auditors' knowledge and judgment performance: a cognitive script approach, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 21 No. 4, pp. 339-59.
13. Cohen, M.D. and Bacdayan, P. (1994), Organizational routines are stored as procedural memory: evidence from a laboratory study, Organization Science, Vol. 5 No. 4, pp. 554-68.
14. Cohen, M.D., Burkhart, R., Dosi, G., Egidi, M., Marengo, L., Warglien, M. and Winter, S. (1996), Routines and other recurring action patterns of organizations: contemporary research issues, Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 5 No. 3, pp. 653-98.
15. Dimaggio, P.J. and Powell, W.W. (1991), The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields, in Powell, W.W. and Dimaggio, P.J. (Eds), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, pp. 63-82.
16. Dosi, G. (1997), Opportunities, incentives and the collective patterns of technological change, The Economic Journal, Vol. 107 No. 444, pp. 1530-47.
17. Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989), Building theories from case study research, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 14 No. 4, pp. 532-50.
18. Feldman, M.S. (2000), Organizational routines as a source of continuous change, Organization Science, Vol. 11 No. 6, pp. 611-29.
19. Feldman, M.S. (2003), A performative perspective on stability and change in organizational routines, Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 12 No. 4, p. 727.
20. Feldman, M.S. and Pentland, B.T. (2003), Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 48 No. 1, pp. 94-118.
21. Gersick, C.J.G. and Hackman, J.R. (1990), Habitual routines in task-performing groups, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 47 No. 1, pp. 65-97.
22. Giddens, A. (1984), The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
23. Gilbert, C.G. (2005), Unbundling the structure of inertia: resource versus routine rigidity Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 48 No. 5, pp. 741-63.
24. Gioia, D.A. and Poole, P.P. (1984), Scripts in organizational behavior, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 9 No. 3, pp. 449-59.
25. Hannan, M.T. and Freeman, J. (1984), Structural inertia and organizational change, American Sociological Review, Vol. 49 No. 2, pp. 149-64.
26. Hannan, M.T., Pólos, L. and Carroll, G.R. (2004), The evolution of inertia, Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 213-42.
27. Harris, S.G. (1994), Organizational culture and individual sensemaking: a schema-based perspective, Organization Science, Vol. 5 No. 3, pp. 309-21.
28. Hodgkinson, G.P. (1997), Cognitive inertia in a turbulent market: the case of UK residential estate agents, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 34 No. 6, pp. 921-45.
29. Hodgson, M.G. and Knudsen, T. (2004), The firm as an interactor: firms as vehicles for habits and routines, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Vol. 14 No. 3, p. 281.
30. Hopper, T. and Major, M. (2007), Extending institutional analysis through theoretical triangulation: regulation and activity-based costing in Portuguese telecommunications, European Accounting Review, Vol. 16 No. 1, pp. 59-97.
31. Labianca, G., Gray, B. and Brass, D.J. (2000), A grounded model of organizational schema change during empowerment, Organization Studies, Vol. 11 No. 2, pp. 235-57.
32. Lane, D. and Maxfield, R. (2005), Ontological unsecurity and innovation, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Vol. 15 No. 1, pp. 3-50.
33. Lazaric, N. and Raybaut, A. (2005), Knowledge, hierarchy and the selection of routines: an interpretative model with group interactions, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Vol. 15 No. 4, pp. 393-421.
34. Lewin, K. (1958), The group reason and social change, in Maccoby, E. (Ed.), Readings in Social Psychology, Holt, Rinehart & Winston, London.
35. Louis, M.R. (1980), Surprise and sense making: what newcomers experience in entering unfamiliar organizational settings, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 25, pp. 226-51.
36. Luka, K. (2007), Management accounting change and stability: loosely coupled rules and routines in action, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 18 No. 1, pp. 76-101.
37. Marshall, C. and Rossman, G.B. (1999), Designing Qualitative Research, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
38. Miller, D. and Friesen, P.H. (1980), Momentum and revolution in organizational adaptation, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 23 No. 4, pp. 591-614.
39. Nelson, R.R. and Winter, S.G. (1982), An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
40. Nooteboom, B. (2000), Learning and Innovation in Organizations and Economies, Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
41. Palmer, I. and Dunford, R. (2002), Managing discursive tension: the co-existence of individualist and collaborative discourses in flight centre, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 39 No. 8, pp. 1045-69.
42. Perren, L. and Grant, P. (2000), The evolution of management accounting routines in small businesses: a social construction perspective, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 11 No. 4, pp. 391-411.
43. Porac, J.F., Ferris, G.R. and Fedor, D.B. (1983), Causal attributions, affect, and expectations for a day's work performance, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 26 No. 2, pp. 285-96.
44. Prasad, P. (1993), Symbolic processes in the implementation of technological change: a symbolic interactionist study of work computerization, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 36 No. 6, pp. 1400-29.
45. Prasad, P. and Prasad, A. (2000), Stretching the iron cage: the constitution and implications of routine workplace resistance, Organization Science, Vol. 11 No. 4, pp. 387-403.
46. Reynaud, B. (1996), Collective dynamics: reflections on the introduction of a salary rule in a maintenance workshop, Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 5 No. 3, pp. 699-721.
47. Reynaud, B. (2005), The void at the heart of rules: routines in the context of rule-following. The case of the Paris metro workshop, Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 14 No. 5, pp. 847-71.
48. Schank, R.C. and Abelson, R.P. (1977), Scripts, Plans, Goals and Understanding: An Inquiry into Human Knowledge Structures, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, Hillsdale, NJ.
49. Siti-Nabiha, A.K. and Scapens, R.W. (2005), Stability and change: an institutionalist study of management accounting change, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 18 No. 1, pp. 44-73.
50. Sjöstrand, S.-E. (1993), The socioeconomic institutions of organizing: origin, emergence, and reproduction, The Journal of Socio-Economics, Vol. 22 No. 4, pp. 323-52.
51. Sluyterman, K., Dankers, J., Van Der Linden, J and Luiten Van Zanden, J. (1998), Het cooperatieve alternatief, honderd jaar Rabobank 1898-1998, Sdu Uitgevers, Den Haag.
52. Soin, K., Seal, W. and Cullen, J. (2002), ABC and organizational change: an institutional perspective, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 13 No. 2, pp. 249-71.
53. Tripsas, M. and Gavetti, G. (2000), Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: evidence from digital imaging, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 21 Nos 10/11, pp. 1147-61.
54. Van Maanen, J. (1979), The fact of fiction in organizational ethnography, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 24 No. 3, pp. 539-50.
55. Weick, K.E. and Roberts, K.H. (1993), Collective mind in organizations: heedful interrelating on flight decks, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 38 No. 3, pp. 357-81.
56. Weick, K.E. (1995), Sensemaking in Organizations, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
57. Weick, K.E., Sutcliffe, K.M. and Obstfeld, D. (2005), Organizing and the process of sensemaking, Organization Science, Vol. 16 No. 4, pp. 409-21.
58. Wofford, J.C. (1994), An examination of the cognitive processes used to handle employee job problems, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 37 No. 1, pp. 180-92.