When and how do students engage in sense-making in a physics lab?

AIP Conference Proceedings

Volumn 883, Issue , 2007, Pages 93-96

  Karelina, Anna ^a   Etkina, Eugenia ^a  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Design labs; Sense making

Indexed keywords

EID: 68349106039     PISSN: 0094243X     EISSN: 15517616     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1063/1.2508699     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (8)

1. E. Etkina and A. Van Heuvelen, Proceedings of the 2001 Physics Education Research Conference. Rochester, NY, PERC publishing, 17-21 (2001).
2. E. Etkina, A. Van Heuvelen, S. White-Brahmia, D. T. Brookes, M. Gentile, S. Murthy, D. Rosengrant, and A. Warren, Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 2, 020103 (2006).
3. S. Murthy and E. Etkina, 2004 Physics Education Research conference, edited by J. Marx, P. Heron, and S. Franklin, AIP Conference Proceedings, 790, 133-136 (2005).
4. Rebecca Lippmann and the Physics Education Research Group, "Analyzing students' use of metacognition during laboratory activities," AREA Meeting, New Orleans, April 2002.
5. R. Lippmann Kung, A. Danielson, and C. Linder," Metacognition in the student laboratory: is increase metacognition necessarily better?", EARLI symposium August 2005.
6. V. Otero, "The process of learning static electricity and the role of the computer stimulator," Ph.D. Thesis, San Diego University, 2001.
7. A. F. Artzt and E. Armour-Thomas, Cognition and Instruction, 9, 137-175 (1992).
8. P. Adey and M. Shayer, Cognition and instruction, 11, 1-29 (1993).