A photographic system for the three-dimensional study of facial morphology

Angle Orthodontist

Volumn 79, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 1070-1077

  Menezes, Marcio De ^a   Rosati, Riccardo ^a   Allievi, Cristina ^a   Sforza, Chiarella ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MILAN   (Italy)

Author keywords

Face; Photographs; Soft tissue analysis; Three dimensional

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CEPHALOMETRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; FACE; FEMALE; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PHOTOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ADULT; CEPHALOMETRY; FACE; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; PHOTOGRAMMETRY; PHOTOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOFTWARE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 68349096409     PISSN: 00033219     EISSN: 00033219     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2319/111008-570     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Ghoddousi H, Edler R, Haers P, Wertheim D, Greenhill D. Comparison of three methods of facial measurement. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;36:250-258.
2. Tollefson TT, Sykes JM. Computer imaging software for profile photograph analysis. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2007;9: 113-119.
3. Wong JY, Oh AK, Ohta E, Hunt AT, Rogers GF, Mulliken JB, Deutsch CK. Validity and reliability of craniofacial anthropometric measurement of 3D digital photogrammetric images. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2008;45:232-239.
4. Weinberg SM, Scott NM, Neiswanger K, Brandon CA, Marazita ML. Digital three-dimensional photogrammetry: evaluation of anthropometric precision and accuracy using a Genex 3D camera system. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2004; 41:507-518.
5. Weinberg SM, Naidoo S, Govier DP, Martin RA, Kane AA, Marazita ML. Anthropometric precision and accuracy of digital three-dimensional photogrammetry: comparing the Genex and 3dMD imaging systems with one another and with direct anthropometry. J Craniofac Surg. 2006;17:477-483.
6. Braddock SR, Henley KM, Maria BL. The face of Joubert syndrome: a study of dysmorphology and anthropometry. Am J Med Genet. 2007;143A:3235-3242.
7. Guyot L, Dubuc M, Richard O, Philip N, Dutour O. Comparison between direct clinical and digital photogrammetric measurements in patients with 22q11 microdeletion. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003;32:246-252.
8. Hammond P. The use of 3D face shape modeling in dysmorphology. Arch Dis Child. 2007;92:1120-1126.
9. Dimaggio FR, Ciusa V, Sforza C, Ferrario VF. Photographic soft-tissue profile analysis in children at 6 years of age. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007;132:475-480.
10. Douglas TS. Image processing for craniofacial landmark identification and measurement: a review of photogrammetry and cephalometry. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2004;28:401-419.
11. Hammond P, Hutton TJ, Allanson JE, et al. 3D analysis of facial morphology. Am J Med Genet. 2004;126A:339-348.
12. Kau CH, Richmond S, Zhurov AI, Knox J, Chestnutt I, Hartles F, Playle R. Reliability of measuring facial morphology with a 3-dimensional laser scanning system. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005;128:424-430.
13. Sforza C, Peretta R, Grandi G, Ferronato G, Ferrario VF. Three-dimensional facial morphometry in skeletal Class III patients: a non-invasive study of soft-tissue changes before and after orthognathic surgery. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;45:138-144.
14. Muradin MS, Rosenberg A, van der Bilt A, Stoelinga PJ, Koole R. The reliability of frontal facial photographs to assess changes in nasolabial soft tissues. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;36:728-734.
15. Sforza C, Dimaggio FR, Dellavia C, Grandi G, Ferrario VF. Two-dimensional vs three-dimensional assessment of soft tissue facial profile: a non invasive study in 6-year-old healthy children. Minerva Stomatol. 2007;56:253-265.
16. Sforza C, Ferrario VF. Soft-tissue facial anthropometry in three dimensions: from anatomical landmarks to digital morphology in research, clinics and forensic anthropology. J Anthropol Sci. 2006;84:97-124.
17. Vander Pluym J, Shan WW, Taher Z, Beaulieu C, Plewes C, Peterson AE, Beattie OB, Bamforth JS. Use of magnetic resonance imaging to measure facial soft tissue depth. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2007;44:52-57.
18. Loukas M, Kapos T, Louis RG Jr, Wartman C, Jones A, Hallner B. Gross anatomical, CT and MRI analyses of the buccal fat pad with special emphasis on volumetric variations. Surg Radiol Anat. 2006;28:254-260.
19. Khambay B, Nairn N, Bell A, Miller J, Bowman A, Ayoub AF. Validation and reproducibility of a high-resolution threedimensional facial imaging system. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;46:27-32.
20. Kimoto K, Garrett NR. Evaluation of a 3D digital photographic imaging system of the human face. J Oral Rehabil. 2007;34:201-205.
21. Winder RJ, Darvann TA, McKnight W, Magee JD, Ramsay-Baggs P. Technical validation of the Di3D stereophotogrammetry surface imaging system. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;46:33-37.
22. Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Poggio CE, Cova M, Tartaglia G. Preliminary evaluation of an electromagnetic three-dimensional digitizer in facial anthropometry. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1998;35:9-15.
23. Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Serrao G, Ciusa V, Dellavia C. Growth and aging of facial soft tissues: a computerized three-dimensional mesh diagram analysis. Clin Anat. 2003; 16:420-433.
24. Majid Z, Chong AK, Ahmad A, Setan H, Samsudin AR. Photogrammetry and 3D laser scanning as spatial data capture techniques for a national craniofacial database. Photogramm Rec. 2005;20:48-6