The reliability of frontal facial photographs to assess changes in nasolabial soft tissues

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Volumn 36, Issue 8, 2007, Pages 728-734

  Muradin, M S M ^a   Rosenberg, A ^a   van der Bilt, A ^a   Stoelinga, P J W ^b,c   Koole, R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^b RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^c MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

frontal facial photographs; Le Fort I osteotomy; nasolabial dynamics; orthognathic surgery; reliability

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; FACIAL EXPRESSION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MAXILLA OSTEOTOMY; MEDICAL PHOTOGRAPHY; NORMAL HUMAN; OBSERVER VARIATION; ORTHOGNATHIC SURGERY; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; RELIABILITY; SURGICAL ANATOMY; VIDEORECORDING; VOLUNTEER;

ADULT; CEPHALOMETRY; EPIDEMIOLOGIC METHODS; FACE; FEMALE; HUMANS; LIP; MALE; NOSE; OSTEOTOMY, LE FORT; PHOTOGRAPHY; SMILING;

EID: 34447618971     PISSN: 09015027     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2007.05.010     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Ackerman J.L., Ackerman M.B., Brensinger C.M., and Landis J.R. A morphometric analysis of the posed smile. Clin Orthod Res 1 (1998) 2-11
2. Aung S.C., Ngim R.C., and Lee S.T. Evaluation of the laser scanner as a surface measuring tool and its accuracy compared with direct facial anthropometric measurements. Br J Plast Surg 48 (1995) 551-558
3. Battagel J.M. A comparative assessment of cephalometric errors. Eur J Orthod 15 (1993) 305-314
4. Baumrind S., and Frantz R.C. The reliability of the head film measurements. 2. Conventional angular and linear measurements. Am J Orthod 60 (1971) 505-517
5. Betts N.J., Vig K.W.L., Vig P., Spalding P., and Fonseca R.J. Changes in the nasal and labial soft tissues after surgical repositioning of the maxilla. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg 8 (1993) 7-23
6. Bland J.M., and Altman D.G. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet (1986) 307-310
7. Bush K., and Antonyshyn O. Three-dimensional facial anthropometry using a laser surface scanner. Plast Reconstr Surg 98 (1996) 226-235
8. Carlotti A.C.J., Aschaffenburg P.H., and Schendel S.A. Facial changes associated with surgical advancement of the lip and maxilla. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 44 (1986) 593-596
9. Chen L.-H., and Lizuka T. Evaluation and prediction of the facial appearance after surgical correction of mandibular hyperplasia. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 24 (1995) 322-326
10. Coward T.J., Scott B.J.J., Watson R.M., and Richards R. Laser scanning of the ear identifying the shape and position in subjects with normal facial symmetry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 29 (2000) 18-23
11. Dahlberg G. Statistical Methods for Medical and Biological Students (1940), Interscience Publications, New York
12. Farkas L.G., Bryson W., and Klotz J. Is photogrammetry of the face reliable?. Plast Reconstr Surg 66 (1980) 346-355
13. Freihofer H.P. The lip profile after correction of retromaxillism in cleft and non-cleft patients. J Maxillofac Surg 4 (1976) 136-141
14. Freihofer H.P. Changes in nasal profile after maxillary advancement in cleft and non-cleft patients. J Maxillofac Surg 5 (1977) 20-27
15. Frey M., Jenny A., Giovanoli P., and Stussi E. Development of a new documentation system for facial movements as a basis for the international registry for neuromuscular reconstruction of the face. Plast Reconstr Surg 93 (1994) 1334-1349
16. Gavan J.A., Washburn S.L., and Lewis P.H. Photography: an anthropometric tool. Am J Phys Anthropol 10 (1952) 331
17. Guest E., Berry E., and Morris D. Novel methods for quantifying soft tissue changes after orthognathic surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 30 (2001) 484-489
18. Hajeer M.Y., Ayoub A.F., Millett D.T., Bock M., and Siebert J.P. Three-dimensional imaging in orthognathic surgery: the clinical application of a new method. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg 17 (2002) 1-13
19. Houston W.J.B. The analysis of errors in orthodontic measurements. Am J Orthod 83 (1983) 382-390
20. Johns F.R., Johnson M.J., Buckley M.J., Braun T.W., and Close J.M. Changes in facial movements after maxillary osteotomies. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 55 (1997) 1044-1048
21. Johnson P., Brown H., and Kuzon W. Simultaneous quantitation of facial movements: the maximal static response assay of facial nerve function. Ann Plast Surg 32 (1994) 171
22. Johnston D.J., Millett D.T., Ayoub A.F., and Bock M. Are facial expressions reproducible?. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 40 (2003) 291-296
23. Mildtgard J., Bjork G., and Linder-Aronson S. Reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks and errors of measurements of cephalometric cranial distances. Angle Orthod 44 (1974) 56-61
24. Mommaerts M.Y. Reliability and validity of a backlighted digitizer when used for craniofacial measurements. J Craniofac Surg 8 (1997) 222-228
25. Nafziger Y.J. A study of patient facial expressivity in relation to orthodontic/surgical treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 106 (1994) 227-237
26. Nanda R.S., Ghosh J., and Bazakidou E. Three-dimensional facial analysis using a video imaging system. Angle Orthod 66 (1996) 181-188
27. Paletz J.L., Mantkelow R.T., and Chaban R. The shape of a normal smile: Implications for facial paralysis reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 93 (1994) 784
28. Peled M., Ardekian L., Krausz A.A., and Aizenbud D. Comparing the effects of V-Y advancement versus simple closure on upper lip aesthetics after Le Fort I advancement. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 62 (2004) 315-319
29. Ras F., Habets L.L., van Ginkel F.C., and Prahl-Andersen B. Quantification of facial morphology using stereophotogrammetry- Demonstration of a new concept. J Dent 24 (1996) 369-374
30. Richardson C.K., Bowers D., Bauer R.M., Heilman K.M., and Leonard C.M. Digitizing the moving face during dynamic displays of emotion. Neuropsychologia 38 (2000) 1028-1039
31. Rigsbee III O.H., Sperry Th.P., and BeGole E.A. The influence of facial animation on smile characteristics. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg 4 (1988) 233-239
32. Rosenberg A., Muradin M.S.M., and van der Bilt A. Nasolabial esthetics after Le Fort I osteotomy and V-Y closure: a statistical evaluation. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg 17 (2002) 29-39
33. Sackett D.L., Haynes R.B., and Tugwell P. Clinical Epidemiology: A Basic Science for Clinical Medicine (1985), Little, Brown & Co., Boston 51
34. Stewart A., McCance A.M., James D.R., and Moss J.P. Three-dimensional nasal changes following maxillary advancement in cleft patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 25 (1996) 171-177
35. Strauss R.A., Weis B.D., Lindauer S.J., Rebellato J., and Isaacson R.J. Variability of facial photographs for use in treatment planning for orthodontics and orthognathic surgery. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg 12 (1997) 197
36. Trotman C.A., and Faraway J.J. Sensitivity of a method for the analysis of facial mobility. II. Interlandmark separation. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 35 (1998) 142-153
37. Trotman C.A., Gross M.M., and Moffatt K. Reliability of a three-dimensional method for measuring facial animation: a case report. Angle Orthod 66 (1996) 195-198
38. Trotman C.A., Stohler Ch.S., and Johnston L.E. Measurement of facial soft tissue mobility in man. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 35 (1997) 16-25
39. Weinberg S.M., and Kolar J.C. Three-dimensional surface imaging: limitations and considerations from the anthropometric perspective. J Craniofac Surg 16 (2005) 847-851
40. Xia J., Samman N., Yeung R.W.K., and Tideman H. Computer-assisted three-dimensional surgical planning and simulation: 3D color facial model generation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 29 (2000) 2-10