An application of a reduced cost approach to spatial forest planning

Forest Science

Volumn 55, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 13-22

  Pukkala, Timo ^a   Heinonen, Tero ^a   Kurttila, Mikko ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EASTERN FINLAND   (Finland)

^b FINNISH FOREST RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Finland)

Author keywords

Cellular automata; Dual prices; Dual problem; Lagrangean relaxation; Linear programming; Simulated annealing; Spatial optimization

Indexed keywords

DECISION SPACE; DUAL PRICES; DUAL PROBLEM; FOREST PLANNING; FOREST STAND; LAGRANGEAN RELAXATION; MULTI OBJECTIVE; OBJECTIVE FUNCTION VALUES; OBJECTIVE FUNCTIONS; REDUCED COST; SPATIAL APPLICATIONS; SPATIAL FOREST PLANNING; SPATIAL OPTIMIZATION; SPATIAL PROBLEMS; SUB-PROBLEMS; SUBGRADIENT METHODS;

ANNEALING; AUTOMATA THEORY; CELLULAR AUTOMATA; COMBINATORIAL OPTIMIZATION; COSTS; DYNAMIC PROGRAMMING; FLAME RESISTANCE; HEURISTIC METHODS; LINEAR PROGRAMMING; LINEARIZATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION SYSTEMS; ROBOTS; TABU SEARCH; TRANSLATION (LANGUAGES);

SIMULATED ANNEALING;

EID: 68349091651     PISSN: 0015749X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. BEASLEY, J.E. 1993. Lagrangian relaxation. P. 243-303 in Modern heuristic techniques for combinatorial problems, Reeves, C.R. (ed.). John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.
2. FISHER, M.L. 1981. The Lagrangian relaxation method for solving integer programming problems. Manag. Sci. 27(1):1-18.
3. HEINONEN, T., M. KURTTILA, AND T. PUKKALA, T. 2007. Possibilities to aggregate raster cells through spatial optimization in forest planning. Silva Fenn. 41(1):89-103.
4. HEINONEN, T., AND T. PUKKALA. 2004. A comparison between one- and two-neighbourhoods in heuristic search with spatial forest management goals. Silva Fenn. 38(3):319-332.
5. HEINONEN, T., AND T. PUKKALA. 2007. The use of cellular automaton approach in forest planning. Can. J. For. Res. 37(11): 2188-2200.
6. HOGANSON, H.M., AND D.W. ROSE. 1984. A simulation approach for optimal timber management scheduling. For. Sci. 30(1): 220-238.
7. HOGANSON, H., J. BIXBY, R. BERGMANN, AND J. BORGES. 2004. Large-scale planning to address interior space production: three case studies from northern Minnesota. Silva Lusit. 12:35-47.
8. HOLMGREN, P., AND T. THURESSON. 1997. Applying objectively estimated and spatially continuous forest parameters in tactical planning to obtain dynamic treatment units. For. Sci. 43(3): 317-326.
9. HYVÖNEN, P., A. PEKKARINEN, AND S. TUOMINEN. 2005. Segment-level compartment inventory for forest management. Scand. J. For. Res. 20(1):75-84.
10. JIMENEZ REDONDO, N., AND A.J. CONEJO. 1999. Short-term hydro-thermal coordination by Lagrangia relaxation: Solution of the dual problem. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 14(1):89-95.
11. LU, F., AND L.O. ERIKSSON. 2000. Formation of harvest units with genetic algorithms. For. Ecol. Manag. 130(1):57-67.
12. MATHEY, A.H., E. KRCMAR, D. TAIT, I. VERTINSKY, AND J. INNES. 2007. Forest planning using co-evolutionary cellular automata. For. Ecol. Manag. 239:45-56.
13. MATHEY, A.H., AND J. NELSON. 2008. Decentralized planning models-A cellular automata framework. P. 169-185 in Designing green landscapes, Gadow, K., and T. Pukkala (eds.). Springer, New York, NY.
14. NÆSSET, E. 2004. Accuracy of forest inventory using airborne laser scanning: evaluating the first Nordic full-scale operational project. Scand. J. For. Res. 19(4):554-557.
15. NÆSSET, E., AND K.O. BJERKNES. 2001. Estimating tree heights and number of stems in young forest stands using airborne laser scanner data. Remote Sens. Environ. 78:328-340.
16. PAREDES, G.L., AND J.D. BRODIE. 1988. Activity analysis in forest planning. For. Sci. 34(1):3-18.
17. PAREDES, G.L., AND J.D. BRODIE. 1989. Land value and the linkage between stand and forest level analyses. Land Econ. 65(2):158-166.
18. PUKKALA, T. 2002. Introduction to multi-objective forest planning. P. 1-20 in Multi-objective forest planning, Pukkala, T. (ed.). Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
19. PUKKALA, T. 2004. Monikäytön suunnitteluohjelma Monsu. Ohjelmiston toiminta ja käyttö. University of Joensuu Faculty of Forestry. 72 p.
20. PUKKALA, T. 2005. Metsikon tuottarvon ennustemallit kivennäis-maan männikoille, kuusikoille ja rauduskoivikoille. Metsatieteen aikakauskirja 3:311-322.
21. PUKKALA, T., AND T. HEINONEN. 2006. Optimizing heuristic search in forest planning. Nonlin. Anal. Real World Applic. 7:1284-1297.
22. STRANGE, N., H. MEILBY, AND T.B. JELLESMARK. 2002. Optimization of land use in afforestation areas using evolutionary self-organization. For. Sci. 48(3):543-555.
23. SUVANTO, A., M. MALTAMO, P. PACKALÉN, AND J. KANGAS. 2005. Kuviokohtaisten puustotunnusten ennustaminen laserkeilauk-sella. Metsatieteen aikakauskirja. 4:413-428.
24. TOKOLA, T., J. PITKÄNEN, S. PARTINEN, AND E. MUINONEN. 1996. Point accuracy of a non-parametric method in estimation of forest characteristics with different satellite materials. Int. J. Remote Sens. 17:2333-2351.
25. WEI, Y., AND H.M. HOGANSON. 2005. Landscape impacts from valuing core area in national forest planning. For. Ecol. Manag. 218:89-106.
26. WEI, Y., AND H. HOGANSON. 2006. Spatial information for scheduling core area production in forest planning, Can. J. For. Res. 36(1):23-33.