The use of cellular automaton approach in forest planning

Canadian Journal of Forest Research

Volumn 37, Issue 11, 2007, Pages 2188-2200

  Heinonen, Tero ^a   Pukkala, Timo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EASTERN FINLAND   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CELLS; CELLULAR AUTOMATA; LINEAR PROGRAMMING; PLANNING; SIMULATED ANNEALING;

GLOBAL TARGETS; RASTER CELLS; REGENERATION CUTTINGS; VOLUME CONSTRAINTS;

FORESTRY;

CELLULAR AUTOMATON; FOREST MANAGEMENT; OPTIMIZATION; PLANNING METHOD; REGENERATION; SIMULATED ANNEALING; TESTING METHOD;

CELLS; FORESTS; PLANNING;

NUCLEOPOLYHEDROVIRUS;

EID: 38849200490     PISSN: 00455067     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/X07-073     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Barredo, J.I., Kasanko, M., McCormick, N., and Lavalle, C. 2003. Modelling dynamic spatial processes: simulation of urban future scenarios through cellular automata. Landscape Urban Plan. 64: 145-160.
2. Baskent, E.Z., and Jordan, G.A. 2002. Forest landscape management modelling using simulated annealing. For. Ecol. Manag. 165: 29-45.
3. Bettinger, P., Sessions, J., and Boston, K. 1997. Using tabu search to schedule timber harvests subject to spatial wildlife goals for big game. Ecol. Model. 42: 111-123.
4. Bettinger, P., Boston, K., and Sessions, J. 1999. Intensifying a heuristic forest harvest scheduling search procedure with 2-opt decision choices. Can. J. For. Res. 29: 1784-1792. doi:10.1139/cjfr-29-11-1784.
5. Bettinger, P., Graetz, D., Boston, K., Sessions, J., and Chung, W. 2002. Eight heuristic planning techniques applied to three increasingly difficult wildlife planning problems. Silva Fenn. 36: 561-584.
6. Bettinger, P., Graetz, D., and Sessions, J. 2005. A density-dependent stand-level optimization approach for deriving management prescriptions for interior northwest (USA) landscapes. For. Ecol. Manag. 217: 171-186.
7. Boston, K., and Bettinger, P. 2001. The economic impact of green-up constraints in the southeastern United States. For. Ecol. Manag. 145: 191-202.
8. Boston, K., and Bettinger, P. 2002. Combining tabu search and genetic algorithm heuristic techniques to solve spatial harvest scheduling problems. For. Sci. 48: 35-46.
9. Brumelle, S., Granot, D., Halme, M., and Vertinsky, I. 1997. A tabu search algorithm for finding good forest harvest schedules satisfying green-up constraints. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 106: 408-424.
10. Creutz, M. 1986. Deterministic Ising dynamics. Ann. Phys. 67: 62-72.
11. Hargrove, W.W., Gardner, R.H., Turner, M.G., Romme, W.H., and Despain, D.G. 2000. Simulating fire patterns in heterogeneous landscapes. Ecol. Model. 135: 243-263. doi:10.1016/S0304-3800(00)00368-9.
12. Hoganson, H.M., and Borges, J.G. 1998. Using dynamic programming and overlapping subproblems to address adjacency in large harvest scheduling problems. For. Sci. 44: 526-538.
13. Hoganson, H.M., and Rose, D.W. 1984. A simulation approach for optimal timber management scheduling. For. Sci. 30: 220-238.
14. Keymer, J.E., Marquet, P.A., and Johnson, A.R. 1998. Pattern formation in a patch occupancy metapopulation model: a cellular automata approach. J. Theor. Biol. 194: 79-90. doi:10.1006/jtbi.1998.0745.
15. Kirkpatrick, S., Gelatt, C.D., Jr., and Vecchi, M.P. 1983. Optimization by simulated annealing. Science (Washington, D.C.), 220: 671-680. doi:10.1126/science.220.4598.671.
16. Kurttila, M., Pukkala, T., and Loikkanen, J. 2002. The performance of alternative spatial objective types in forest planning calculations: a case for flying squirrel and moose. For. Ecol. Manag. 166: 245-260.
17. Lett, C., Silber, C., and Barret, N. 1999. Comparison of a cellular automata network and an individual-based model for the simulation of forest dynamics. Ecol. Model. 121: 277-293. doi:10.1016/S0304-3800(99)00090-3.
18. Li, X., and Magill, W. 2001. Modeling fire spread under environmental influence using cellular automaton approach. Complexity International [serial online]. Vol. 8. Available from www.complexity.org.au
19. Lockwood, C., and Moore, T. 1993. Harvest scheduling with spatial constraints: a simulated annealing approach. Can. J. For. Res. 23: 468-478.
20. Maerivoet, S., and De Moor, B. 2005. Cellular automata models of road traffic. Phys. Rep. 419: 1-64. doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2005.08.005.
21. Mathey, A.H., Krcmar, E., and Vertinsky, I. 2005. Re-evaluating our approach to forest management planning: a complex journey. For. Chron. 81: 359-364.
22. Mathey, A.H., Krcmar, E., Tait, D., Vertinsky, I., and Innes, J. 2007. Forest planning using co-evolutionary cellular automata. For. Ecol. Manag. 239: 45-56.
23. Meilby, H., Strange, N., and Brukas, V. 2001. Decentralised optimisation of the spatial allocation of recreational and forest reserve areas subject to global constraints. Scand. J. For. Econ. 38: 66-75.
24. Murray, A.T., and Church, R.L. 1995. Measuring the efficacy of adjacency constraint structure in forest planning models. Can. J. For. Res. 25: 1416-1424.
25. Nalle, D.J., Arthur, J.L., and Sessions, J. 2002. Designing compact and contiguous reserve networks with a hybrid heuristic algorithm. For. Sci. 48: 59-68.
26. Pommerening, A. 2006. Evaluating structural indices by reversing forest structural analysis. For. Ecol. Manag. 224: 266-277.
27. Puigdefábregas, J., Gallard, F., Biaciotto, O., Allogia, M., and del Barrio, G. 1999. Banded vegetation patterning in a subantarctic forest of Tierra del Fuego, as an outcome of the interaction between wind and tree growth. Acta Oecol. 20: 135-146. doi:10.1016/S1146-609X(99)80027-7.
28. Pukkala, T. 2004. Monikäytön suunnitteluohjelma Monsu. Ohjelmiston toiminta ja käyttö. Faculty of Forestry, University of Joensuu, Joensuu, Finland. [In Finnish.]
29. Pukkala, T., and Heinonen, T. 2006. Optimizing heuristic search in forest planning. Nonlinear Anal. Real World Appl. 7: 1284-1297. doi:10.1016/j.nonrwa.2005.11.011.
30. Pukkala, T., and Kangas, J. 1993. A heuristic optimization method for forest planning and decision-making. Scand. J. For. Res. 8: 560-570.
31. Pukkala, T., and Kurttila, M. 2005. Examining the performance of six heuristic search techniques in different forest planning problems. Silva Fenn. 39: 67-80.
32. Pukkala, T., and Miina, J. 1997. A method for stochastic multiobjective optimization of stand management. For. Ecol. Manag. 98: 189-203.
33. Raghavan, R. 1993. Cellular automata in pattern recognition. Inf. Sci. 70: 145-177. doi:10.1016/0020-0255(93)90052-N.
34. Roise, J.P. 1986. A nonlinear programming approach to stand optimization. For. Sci. 32: 735-748.
35. Sarkar, P. 2000. A brief survey of cellular automata. ACM Comput. Surv. 32: 81-107.
36. Schrage, L. 1991. LINDO, an optimization modeling system. 4th ed. The Scientific Press, South San Francisco, Calif.
37. Schönfisch, B., and de Roos, A. 1999. Synchronous and asynchronous updating in cellular automata. Biosystems, 51: 123-143. doi:10.1016/S0303-2647(99)00025-8.
38. Soares-Filho, B.S., Goutinho Cerqueira, G., and Lopes Pennachin, C. 2002. DINAMICA - a stochastic cellular automata model designed to simulate the landscape dynamics in an Amazonian colonization frontier. Ecol. Model. 154: 217-235. doi:10.1016/S0304-3800(02)00059-5.
39. Sprott, J.C., Bolliger, J., and Mladenoff, D.J. 2002. Self-organized criticality in forest-landscape evolution. Phys. Lett. A, 297: 267-271. doi:10.1016/S0375-9601(02)00052-X.
40. Strange, N., Meilby, H., and Bogetoft, P. 2001. Land use optimization using self-organizing algorithms. Nat. Resour. Model. 14: 541-574.
41. Strange, N., Meilby, H., and Thorsen, J.T. 2002. Optimizing land use in afforestation areas using evolutionary self-organization. For. Sci. 48: 543-555.
42. Syphard, A.D., Clarke, K.C., and Franklin, J. 2005. Using a cellular automaton model to forecast the effect of urban growth on habitat pattern in southern California. Ecol. Complexity, 2: 185-203.
43. Tarp, P., and Helles, F. 1997. Spatial optimization by simulated annealing and linear programming. Scand. J. For. Res. 12: 390-402.
44. Torres-Rojo, J.M., and Brodie, J.D. 1990. Demonstration of benefits from an optimization approach to the economic analysis of natural pine stands in central Mexico. For. Ecol. Manag. 36: 267-278.
45. Von Neumann, J. 1966. Theory of self-reproduction automata. Edited by A. Burks. University of Illinois Press, Champaign, Ill.
46. Ward, D.P., Murray, A.T., and Phinn, S.R. 2003. Integrating spatial optimization and cellular automata for evaluating urban change. Ann. Reg. Sci. 37: 131-148. doi:10.1007/s001680200113.
47. Wolfram, S. 1984. Universality and complexity in cellular automaton. Physica, 10D: 1-35.
48. Öhman, K. 2000. Creating continuous areas of old forest in long-term forest planning. Can. J. For. Res. 30: 1817-1823. doi:10.1139/cjfr-30- 11-1817.
49. Öhman, K., and Eriksson, L.O. 2002. Allowing for spatial consideration in long-term forest planning by linking linear programming with simulated annealing. For. Ecol. Manag. 161: 221-230.
50. Öhman, K., and Lämås, T. 2003. Clustering of harvest activities in multi-objective long-term forest planning. For. Ecol. Manag. 176: 161-171.