Possibilities to aggregate raster cells through spatial optimization in forest planning

Silva Fennica

Volumn 41, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 89-103

  Heinonen, Tero ^a   Kurttila, Mikko ^b   Pukkala, Timo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EASTERN FINLAND   (Finland)

^b FINNISH FOREST RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Finland)

Author keywords

Landscape metrics; Old forest; Spatial optimisation; Threshold accepting

Indexed keywords

ECOLOGY; FORESTRY; HARVESTING; OPTIMIZATION;

LANDSCAPE METRICS; OLD FOREST; SPATIAL OPTIMISATION; THRESHOLD ACCEPTING;

CELLS;

COMPARTMENTALIZATION; FOREST MANAGEMENT; OLD-GROWTH FOREST; OPTIMIZATION; PLANNING PROCESS;

CELLS; ECOLOGY; FORESTRY; HARVESTING;

EID: 34247475765     PISSN: 00375330     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14214/sf.474     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Bettinger, P., Graetz, D., Boston, K., Sessions, J. & Chung, W. 2002. Eight heuristic planning techniques applied to three increasingly difficult wildlife planning problems. Silva Fennica 36(2): 561-584.
2. Bodansky, E., Gribov, A. & Pilouk, M. 2002. Smoothing and compression of lines obtained by raster-to-vector conversion. Lecture notes in computer science. Springer 2390: 256-265.
3. Borges, J.G., Hoganson, H.M. & Falcão, A.O. 2002. Heuristics in multi-objective forest management. In: Pukkala, T. (ed.). Multi-objective forest planning. Managing Forest Ecosystems, Vol. 6. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands. p. 119-152.
4. Dueck, G. & Scheuer, T. 1990. Threshold accepting: a general purpose optimization algorithm appearing superior to simulated annealing. Journal of Computer Physics 90: 161-175.
5. González, J.R., Palahí, M. & Pukkala, T. 2006. Integrating fire risk considerations in forest management planning in Spain - a landscape level perspective. Landscape Ecology. (In press).
6. Haara, A. 2003. Comparing simulation methods for modelling the errors of compartment inventory data. Silva Fennica 37(4): 477-491.
7. Holmgren, P. & Thuresson, T. 1997. Applying objectively estimated and spatially continuous forest parameters in tactical planning to obtain dynamic treatment units. Forest Science 43(3): 317-326.
8. Hyvönen, P., Pekkarinen, A. & Tuominen, S. 2005. Segment-level compartment inventory for forest management. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 20(1): 75-84.
9. Köhl, M. 1993. Stand inventory techniques in Europe. In: Lund, H.G., Landis, E. & Atterbury, T. (eds.). Stand inventory technoloqies '92. Proceedings of the stand inventory technologies: an international multiple resource conference. The world forestry center. September 13-17 1992. American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. p. 118-127.
10. Kurttila, M., Pukkala, T. & Loikkanen, J. 2002. The performance of alternative spatial objective types in forest planning calculations: a case for flying squirrel and moose. Forest Ecology and Management 166: 245-260.
11. Lind, T. 2000. Strategic forestry planning - evaluation of variable spatial aggregations and forest landscapes. Ph.D. thesis. Acta Universitatis Acriculturae Sueciae Silvestria 149. 28 p.
12. Lu, F. & Eriksson, L.O. 2000. Formation of harvest units with genetic algorithms. Forest Ecology and Management 130: 57-67.
13. Luonnonläheinen metsänhoito. 1994. Metsänhoitosuositukset. Metsäkeskus Tapion julkaisuja 1994. 74 p. (In Finnish).
14. McGarigal, K. & Marks, B.J. 1995. FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, OR. General Technical Report PNW-351.
15. Næsset, E. 2002. Predicting forest stand characteristics with airborne scanning laser using a practical two-stage procedure and field data. Remote Sensing of Environment 80: 88-99.
16. _ , Gobakken, T., Holmgren, J., Hyyppä, H., Hyyppä, J., Maltamo, M., Nilsson, M., Olsson, H., Persson, Å. & Söderman, U. 2004. Laser scanning of forest resources: the Nordic experience. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 19: 482-499.
17. Öhman, K. 2001. Forest planning with consideration to spatial relationships. Doctoral diss. Department. of Forest Resource Management and Geomatics, SLU. Acta Universitatis agriculturae Sueciae, Silvestria 198. 32 p.
18. Pukkala, T. 2004. Monikäytön suunnitteluohjelma Monsu. Ohjelmiston toiminta ja käyttö. University of Joensuu Faculty of Forestry. 72 p. (In Finnish).
19. _ & Kangas, J. 1993. A heuristic optimization method for forest planning and decision making. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 8: 560-570.
20. _ & Heinonen, T. 2006. Optimizing heuristic search in forest planning. Journal of Nonlinear Analysis Series B: Real World Applications. (In press).
21. Strange, N., Meilby, H. & Thorsen, J.T. 2002. Optimizing land use in afforestation areas using evolutionary self-organization. Forest Science 48(3): 543-555.
22. Tuominen, S. & Haakana, M. 2005. Landsat TM imagery and high altitude aerial photographs in estimation of forest characteristics. Silva Fennica 39(4): 573-584.
23. Van Laar, A. & Akça, A. 1997. Forest mensuration. Cuvillier Verlag, Göttingen. 418 p.