Conflict monitoring in early frontotemporal dementia

Neurology

Volumn 73, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 349-355

  Krueger, C E ^a,b   Bird, A C ^a   Growdon, M E ^a   Jang, J Y ^a   Miller, B L ^a   Kramer, J H ^a  

^a UCSF Department of Neurology   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BRAIN CORTEX ATROPHY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FEMALE; FLANKER TEST; FRONTAL VARIANT FRONTOTEMPORAL DEMENTIA; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; MALE; MINI MENTAL STATE EXAMINATION; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCORING SYSTEM; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TASK PERFORMANCE;

EID: 68249156654     PISSN: 00283878     EISSN: 1526632X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181b04b24     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Knopman DS, Petersen RC, Edland SD, et al. The incidence of frontotemporal lobar degeneration in Rochester, Minnesota, 1990 through 1994. Neurology 2004;62:506-508.
2. Ratnavalli E, Brayne C, Dawson K, Hodges JR. The prevalence of frontotemporal dementia. Neurology 2002;58:1615-1621.
3. Perry RJ, Graham A, Williams G, et al. Patterns of frontal lobe atrophy in frontotemporal dementia: a volumetric MRI study. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2006;22:278-287.
4. Liu W, Miller BL, Kramer JH, et al. Behavioral disorders in the frontal and temporal variants of frontotemporal dementia. Neurology 2004;62:742-748.
5. Mummery C, Patterson K, Price C, et al. A voxel-based morphometry study of semantic dementia: relationship between temporal lobe atrophy and semantic memory. Ann Neurol 2000;47:36-45.
6. Rosen HJ, Gorno-Tempini ML, Goldman WP, et al. Patterns of brain atrophy in frontotemporal dementia and semantic dementia. Neurology 2002;58:198-208.
7. Nedjam Z, Devouche E, Dalla Barba G. Confabulation, but not executive dysfunction discriminate AD from frontotemporal dementia. Eur J Neurol 2004;11:728-733.
8. Gregory CA, Hodges JR. Clinical features of frontal lobe dementia in comparison to Alzheimer's disease. J Neural Transm 1996;47:103-123.
9. Alvarez JA, Emory E. Executive function and the frontal lobes: a meta-analytic review. Neuropsychol Rev 2006;16:17-42.
10. Rahman S, Sahakian BJ, Hodges JR, et al. Specific cognitive deficits in mild frontal variant frontotemporal dementia. Brain 1999;122(pt 8):1469-1493.
11. Botvinick MM. Conflict monitoring and decision making: reconciling two perspectives on anterior cingulate function. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 2007;7:356-366.
12. Botvinick MM, Braver TS, Barch DM, et al. Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychol Rev 2001;108:624-652.
13. Botvinick MM, Cohen JD, Carter CS. Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex: an update. Trends Cogn Sci 2004;8:539-546.
14. Carter CS, MacDonald AW III, Ross LL, Stenger VA. Anterior cingulate cortex activity and impaired selfmonitoring of performance in patients with schizophrenia: an event-related fMRI study. Am J Psychiatry 2001;158:1423-1428.
15. Fan J, Hof PR, Guise KG, et al. The functional integration of the anterior cingulate cortex during conflict processing. Cereb Cortex 2008;18:796-805.
16. Pochon JB, Riis J, Sanfey AG, et al. Functional imaging of decision conflict. J Neurosci 2008;28:3468 -3473.
17. Ridderinkhof KR, van den Wildenberg WP, Segalowitz SJ, Carter CS. Neurocognitive mechanisms of cognitive control: the role of prefrontal cortex in action selection, response inhibition, performance monitoring, and reward-based learning. Brain Cogn 2004;56:129-140.
18. Luks TL, Simpson GV, Dale CL, Hough MG. Preparatory allocation of attention and adjustments in conflict processing. Neuroimage 2007;35:949-958.
19. Neary D, Snowden JS, Gustafson L, et al. Frontotemporal lobar degeneration: a consensus on clinical diagnostic criteria. Neurology 1998;51:1546-1554.
20. Kramer JH, Jurik J, Sha SJ, et al. Distinctive neuropsychological patterns in frontotemporal dementia, semantic dementia, and Alzheimer disease. Cogn Behav Neurol 2003;16:211-218.
21. Segonne F, Dale AM, Busa E, et al. A hybrid approach to the skull stripping problem in MRI. Neuroimage 2004;22:1060-1075.
22. Dale AM, Fischl B, Sereno MI. Cortical surface-based analysis I: segmentation and surface reconstruction. Neuroimage 1999;9:179-194.
23. Fischl B, Sereno MI, Dale AM. Cortical surface-based analysis II: Inflation, flattening, and a surface-based coordinate system. Neuroimage 1999;9:195-207.
24. Fischl B, Liu A, Dale AM. Automated manifold surgery: constructing geometrically accurate and topologically correct models of the human cerebral cortex. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2001;20:70-80.
25. Sled JG, Zijdenbos AP, Evans AC. A nonparametric method for automatic correction of intensity nonuniformity in MRI data. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1998;17:87-97.
26. Fischl B, Salat DH, Busa E, et al. Whole brain segmentation: automated labeling of neuroanatomical structures in the human brain. Neuron 2002;33:341-355.
27. Rosas HD, Liu AK, Hersch S, et al. Regional and progressive thinning of the cortical ribbon in Huntington's disease. Neurology 2002;58:695-701.
28. Salat DH, Buckner RL, Snyder AZ, et al. Thinning of the cerebral cortex in aging. Cereb Cortex 2004;14:721-730.
29. Fischl B, van der Kouwe A, Destrieux C, et al. Automatically parcellating the human cerebral cortex. Cereb Cortex 2004;14:11-22.
30. Desikan RS, Segonne F, Fischl B, et al. An automated labeling system for subdividing the human cerebral cortex on MRI scans into gyral based regions of interest. Neuroimage 2006;31:968-980.
31. Rex DE, Ma JQ, Toga AW. The LONI Pipeline Processing Environment. Neuroimage 2003;19:1033-1048.
32. Botvinick M, Nystrom LE, Fissell K, Carter CS, Cohen JD. Conflict monitoring versus selection-for-action in anterior cingulate cortex. Nature 1999;402:179-181.
33. Wylie SA, Ridderinkhof KR, Eckerle MK, Manning CA. Inefficient response inhibition in individuals with mild cognitive impairment. Neuropsychologia 2007;45:1408-1419.
34. Praamstra P, Plat EM, Meyer AS, Horstink MW. Motor cortex activation in Parkinson's disease: dissociation of electrocortical and peripheral measures of response generation. Mov Disord 1999;14:790-799.
35. Praamstra P, Stegeman DF, Cools AR, Horstink MW. Reliance on external cues for movement initiation in Parkinson's disease: evidence from movement-related potentials. Brain 1998;121(pt 1):167-177.
36. Wylie SA, Stout JC, Bashore TR. Activation of conflicting responses in Parkinson's disease: evidence for degrading and facilitating effects on response time. Neuropsychologia 2005;43:1033-1043.
37. Ridderinkhof KR, Scheres A, Oosterlaan J, Sergeant JA. Delta plots in the study of individual differences: new tools reveal response inhibition deficits in AD/Hd that are eliminated by methylphenidate treatment. J Abnorm Psychol 2005;114:197-215.
38. Carmichael ST, Price JL. Connectional networks within the orbital and medial prefrontal cortex of macaque monkeys. J Comp Neurol 1996;371:179-207.
39. Viskontas IV, Possin KL, Miller BL. Symptoms of frontotemporal dementia provide insights into orbitofrontal cortex function and social behavior. Ann NY Acad Sci 2007;1121:528-545.
40. Wittenberg D, Possin KL, Rascovsky K, Rankin KP, Miller BL, Kramer JH. The early neuropsychological and behavioral characteristics of frontotemporal dementia. Neuropsychol Rev 2008;18:91-102.