Propiedades psicométricas de una versión breve de la Escala de Ajuste Diádico en muestras españolas

International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 501-517

  Santos Iglesias, Pablo ^a   Vallejo Medina, Pablo ^a   Sierra, Juan Carlos ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRANADA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Discriminant analysis; Dyadic Adjustment Scale; Instrumental study; Reliability; Validity

Indexed keywords

EID: 68249136997     PISSN: 16972600     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Antill, J.K. y Cotton, S. (1982). Spanier's Dyadic Adjustment Scale: Some confirmatory analyses. Australian Psychologist, 17, 181-189.
2. Antoine, P., Christophe, V. y Nandrino, J.L. (2008). Echelle d'ajustement dyadique: intérêts d'une révision et validation d'une version abrégée. Encephale, 34, 38-46.
3. Baillargeon, J., Dubois, G. y Marineau, R. (1986). Traduction française de l'Échelle d'ajustement dyadique. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 18, 25-34.
4. Boning, U. y Henss, R. (1983). Empirische Ergebnisse zum Einsatz der «Dyadic Adjustment Scale» von G.B. Spanier. Partnerberatung, 1, 37-43.
5. Bornstein, P.H. y Bornstein, M.T. (1988). Terapia de pareja. Enfoque conductual-sistémico. Madrid: Pirámide.
6. Browne, M. y Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. En K. Bollen y J. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
7. Busby, D.M., Christensen, C., Crane, D.R. y Larson, J.H. (1995). A revision of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale for use with distressed and nondistressed couples: Construct hierarchy and multidimensional scale. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 21, 289-308.
8. Cáceres, A. y Cáceres, J. (2006). Violencia en relaciones íntimas en dos etapas evolutivas. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 6, 271-284.
9. Carey, M.P., Spector, I.P., Lantinga, L.J. y Krauss, D.J. (1993). Reliability of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale. Psychological Assessment, 5, 238-240.
10. Carrasco, M.J. (1998). ASPA. Cuestionario de Aserción en la Pareja. Madrid: TEA.
11. Carretero-Dios, H. y Pérez, C. (2005). Normas para el desarrollo y revisión de estudios instrumentales. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 5, 521-551.
12. Carretero-Dios, H. y Pérez, C. (2007). Standards for the development and review of instrumental studies: Considerations about test selection in psychological research. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 7, 863-882.
13. Crane, D.R., Allgood, S.M., Larson, J.H. y Griffin, W. (1990). Assessing marital quality with distressed and nondistressed couples: A comparison and equivalency table for three frequently used measures. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 87-93.
14. Crane, D.R., Busby, D.M. y Larson, J.H. (1991). A factor analysis of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale with distressed and nondistressed couples. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 19, 60-66.
15. Crane, D.R., Middleton, K.C. y Bean, R.A. (2000). Establishing criterion scores for the Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale and the Revised Dyadic Adjustment Scale. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 28, 53-60.
16. David, C., Steele, R., Forehand, R. y Armistead, L. (1996). The role of family conflict and marital conflict in adolescent functioning. Journal of Family Violence, 11, 81-91.
17. Deal, J.E. (1996). Marital conflict and differential treatment of siblings. Family Process, 35, 333-346.
18. Dinkel, A. y Balck, F. (2006). Psychometrische analyse der deutschen dyadic adjustment scale. Zeitschrift fur Psychologie, 214, 1-9.
19. Epstein, N. (1981). Assertiveness training in marital treatment. En G.P. Sholevar (Ed.), The handbook of marriage and marital therapy (pp. 287-302). Nueva York: Spectrum.
20. Espina Eizaguirre, A. (2002). Alexitimia y relaciones de pareja. Psicothema, 14, 760-764.
21. Fisiloglu, H. y Demir, A. (2000). Applicability of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale for measurement of marital quality with Turkish couples. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 16, 214-218.
22. Fisiloglu, H. y Lorenzetti, A.F. (1994). The relation of family cohesion to marital adjustment. Contemporary Family Therapy: An International Journal, 16, 539-552.
23. Fitzpatrick, M.K., Salgado, D.M., Suvak, M.K., King, L.A. y King, D.W. (2004). Associations of gender-role ideology with behavioral and attitudinal features of intimate partner aggression. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 5, 91-102.
24. Gentili, P., Contreras, L., Cassaniti, M. y D'Arista, F. (2002). La Dyadic Adjustment Scale: una misura dell'adattamento di coppia. Minerva Psichiatrica, 43, 107-116.
25. Goodwin, R. (1992). Overall, just how happy are you? The magical question 31 of the Spanier Dyadic Adjustment Scale. Family Therapy, 19, 273-275.
26. Graham, J.M., Liu, Y.J. y Jeziorski, J.L. (2006). The Dyadic Adjustment Scale: A reliability generalization meta-analysis. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 68, 701-717.
27. Hu, L. y Bentler, P.M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
28. Hunsley, J., Best, M., Lefebvre, M. y Vito, D. (2001). The seven-item short form of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale: Further evidence of construct validity. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 29, 325-335.
29. Jöreskog, K.G. y Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
30. Kazak, A.E., Jarmas, A. y Snitzer, L. (1988). The assessment of marital satisfaction: An evaluation of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale. Journal of Family Psychology, 2, 82-91.
31. Kline, R.B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Nueva York: Guilford.
32. Kurdek, L.A. (1992). Dimensionality of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale: Evidence from heterosexual and homosexual couples. Journal of Family Psychology, 6, 22-35.
33. Kurdek, L.A. (1998). The nature and predictors of the trajectory of change in marital quality over the first 4 years of marriage for first-married husbands and wives. Journal of Family Psychology, 12, 494-510.
34. Lee, M. y Kim, Z. (1996). A preliminary study on the standardization of the Korean Dyadic Adjustment Scale. Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 15, 129-140.
35. Lim, B.K. y Ivey, D. (2000). The assessment of marital adjustment with Chinese populations: A study of the psychometric properties of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale. Contemporary Family Therapy, 22, 453-465.
36. Locke, H.J. y Wallace, K.M. (1959). Short multi-adjustment and prediction test: Their reliability and validity. Marriage and Family Living, 21, 329-343.
37. McLeod, J.D. (1994). Anxiety disorders and marital quality. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 103, 767-776.
38. Montero, I. y León, O.G. (2007). A guide for naming research studies in Psychology. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 7, 847-862.
39. Nunnally, J.C. y Bernstein, I.J. (1995). Teoría psicométrica. México, DF.: McGraw Hill.
40. Ortiz Barón, M.J., Gómez Zapiain, J. y Apodaca, P. (2002). Apego y satisfacción afectivo-sexual en la pareja. Psicothema, 14, 469-475.
41. Prigerson, H.G., Maciejewski, P.K. y Rosenheck, R.A. (1999). The effects of marital dissolution and marital quality on health and health service use among women. Medical Care, 37, 858-873.
42. Sabourin, S., Lussier, Y., Laplante, B. y Wright, J. (1990). Unidimensional and multidimensional models of dyadic adjustment: A hierarquical reconciliation. Psychological Assessment, 2, 333-337.
43. Sabourin, S., Valois, P. y Lussier, Y. (2005). Development and validation of a brief version of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale with a nonparametric item analysis model. Psychological Assessment, 17, 15-27.
44. Schumm, W.R., Paff-Bergen, L.A., Hatch, R.C. y Obiorah, F.C. (1986). Concurrent and discriminant validity of the Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 48, 381-387.
45. Sharpley, C.F. y Cross, D.G. (1982). A psychometric evaluation of the Spanier Dyadic Adjustment Scale. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 44, 739-741.
46. Sharpley, C.F. y Rogers, H.J. (1984). Preliminary validation of the Abbreviated Spanier Dyadic Adjustment Scale: Some psychometric data regarding a screening test of marital adjustment. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 44, 1045-1049.
47. Shek, D.T.L. (1995). The Chinese version of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale: Does language make a difference? Journal of Clinical Psychology, 51, 802-811.
48. Shek, D.T.L. y Cheung, C.K. (2008). Dimensionality of the Chinese Dyadic Adjustment Scale based on confirmatory factor analysis. Social Indicators Research, 86, 201-212.
49. Shek, D.T.L., Lam, M.C., Tsoi, K.W. y Lam, C.M. (1993). Marital assessment in a Chinese context: An evaluation of three instruments. Hong Kong Journal of Social Work, 27, 80-81.
50. Smolen, R.C., Spiegel, D.A., Bakker-Rabdan, M.K., Bakker, C.B. y Martin, C. (1985). A situational analysis of the relationships between spouse-specific assertiveness and marital adjustment. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 7, 397-410.
51. Spanier, G.B. (1976). Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38, 15-38.
52. Spanier, G.B. (1985). Improve, refine, recast, expand, clarify: Don't abandon. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 47, 1073-1074.
53. Spanier, G.B. (1988). Assessing the strengths of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale. Journal of Family Psychology, 2, 92-94.
54. Spanier, G.B. y Thompson, L. (1982). A confirmatory analysis of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 44, 731-738.
55. Thompson, L. (1988). Women, men, and marital quality. Journal of Family Psychology, 2, 95-100.
56. Vandeleur, C.L., Fenton, B.T., Ferrero, F. y Preisig, M. (2003). Construct validity of the French version of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 62, 167-175.
57. Youngblut, J.M., Brooten, D. y Menzies, V. (2006). Psychometric properties of the Spanish versions of the FACES II and Dyadic Adjustment Scale. Journal of Nursing Measurement, 14, 181-189.