Dyadic Adjustment Scale: Clinical interest of a revision and validation of an abbreviated form;Échelle d'ajustement dyadique : intérêts cliniques d'une révision et validation d'une version abrégée

Encephale

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 38-46

  Antoine, P ^a   Christophe, V ^a   Nandrino, J L ^a  

^a UNIV LILLE   (France)

Author keywords

Couple; Dyadic adjustment; Evaluation; Marital satisfaction; Validity

Indexed keywords

ADJUSTMENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPREHENSION; DYADIC ADJUSTMENT SCALE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MARRIAGE; SATISFACTION; SCORING SYSTEM; VALIDATION STUDY; ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ADOLESCENT; AGED; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT REFERRAL; PERSONALITY TEST; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PSYCHIATRY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOMETRY; REFERENCE VALUE; REPRODUCIBILITY; STATISTICS;

ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MARRIAGE; MIDDLE AGED; PERSONALITY INVENTORY; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PSYCHIATRY; PSYCHOMETRICS; REFERENCE VALUES; REFERRAL AND CONSULTATION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 42949126268     PISSN: 00137006     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.encep.2006.12.005     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Antill J.K., and Cotton S. Spanier's Dyadic Adjustment Scale: some confirmatory analyses. Aust Psychol 17 2 (1982) 181-189
2. Baillargeon J., Dubois G., and Marineau R. Traduction française de l'échelle d'ajustement dyadique. Can J Behav Sci 18 (1986) 25-34
3. Busby D.M., Christensen C., Crane D.R., et al. A revision of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale for use with distressed and nondistressed couples: construct hierarchy and multidimensional scales. J Marital Fam Ther 21 (1995) 289-308
4. Crane D.R., Allgood S., Larson J.H., et al. Assessing marital quality with distressed and non-distressed couples: a comparison and equivalency table for three frequently used measures. J Marriage Fam 52 (1990) 87-93
5. Crane D.R., Busby D.M., and Larson J.H. A factor analysis of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale with distressed and non-distressed couples. Am J Fam Ther 19 (1991) 60-66
6. Eddy J.M., Heyman R.E., and Weiss R.L. An empirical evaluation of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale: exploring the differences between marital "satisfaction" and "adjustment". Behav Assess 13 (1991) 199-220
7. Gentili P., Contreras L., Cassaniti M., et al. La Dyadic Adjustment Scale: una misura dell'adattamento di coppia. Minerva psichiatrica 43 (2002) 107-116
8. Glenn N.D. Quantitative research on marital quality in the1980s: a critical review. J Marriage Fam 52 (1990) 818-831
9. Hunsley J., Best M., Lefebvre M., et al. The seven item short form of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale: further evidence for the construct validity. Am J Fam Ther 29 4 (2001) 325-335
10. Hunsley J., Pinsent C., Lefebvre M., et al. Construct validity of the short forms of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale. Fam Relat 44 (1995) 231-237
11. Hunsley J., Vito D., Pinsent C., et al. Are self-report measures of dyadic relationships influenced by impression management biases?. J Fam Psychol 10 (1996) 322-330
12. Kazak A., Jarmas A., and Snitzer L. The assessment of marital satisfaction: an evaluation of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale. J Fam Psychol 2 (1988) 82-91
13. Kinnunen U., Geurts S., and Mauno S. Work-to-family and its relationship with satisfaction and well-being: a one year longitudinal study on gender differences. Work & Stress 18 (2004) 1-22
14. Kurdek L.A. Dimensionality of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale: evidence from heterosexual and homosexual couples. J Fam Psychol 6 (1992) 22-35
15. Kurdek L.A. The nature and predictors of the trajectory of change in marital quality for husbands and wives over the first ten years of marriage. Dev Psychol 35 (1999) 1283-1296
16. Locke H.J., and Wallace K.M. Short marital-adjustment and prediction tests: their reliability and validity. Marriage Fam Living 21 (1959) 251-255
17. Maling M.S., Gurtman M.B., and Howard K. The response of interpersonal problems to varying doses of psychotherapy. Psychother Res 5 (1995) 63-75
18. Sabourin S., Lussier Y., Laplante B., et al. Unidimensional and multidimensional models of dyadic adjustment: a hierarchical reconciliation. Psychol Assess 2 (1990) 333-337
19. Sabourin S., Valois P., and Lussier Y. Development and validation of a brief version of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale using a nonparametric item analysis model. Psychol Assess 17 (2005) 15-27
20. Sharpley C.F., and Cross D.G. A psychometric evaluation of the Spanier Dyadic Adjustment Scale. J Marriage Fam 44 (1982) 739-741
21. Sharpley C.F., and Rogers H.J. Preliminary validation of the Abbreviated Spanier Dyadic Adjustment Scale: some psychometric data regarding a screening test of marital adjustment. Educ Psychol Meas 44 (1984) 1045-1049
22. Shek D.T.L. The Chinese version of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale: does language make a difference?. J Clin Psychol 51 (1995) 802-811
23. Shields C.G., and Rousseau S.J. A pilot study of an intervention for breast cancer survivors and their spouses. Fam Process 43 (2004) 95-107
24. Spanier G.B. Measuring dyadic adjustment: new scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. J Marriage Fam 38 (1976) 15-28
25. Spanier G.B. Improve, refine, recast, expand, clarify-don't abandon. J Marriage Fam 47 (1985) 1073-1074
26. Spanier G.B., and Thompson L. A confirmatory analysis of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale. J Marriage Fam 44 (1982) 731-738
27. Thompson B. Ten commandments of structural equation modeling. In: Grimm L.G., and Yarnold P.R. (Eds). Reading and understanding more multivariate statistics (2000), APA, Washington, DC
28. Vandeleur C.L., Fenton B.T., Ferrero F., et al. Construct validity of the French version of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale. Swiss J Psychol 62 (2003) 167-176
29. Wherry R.J. Contributions to correlational analysis (1984), Academic Press, New York
30. Whisman M.A., and Jacobson N.S. Change in marital adjustment following marital therapy: a comparison of two outcome measures. Psychol Assess 4 (1992) 219-223
31. Whisman M.A., Uebelacker L.A., and Weinstock L.M. Psychopathology and marital satisfaction: the importance of evaluating both partners. J Consult Clin Psych 72 (2004) 830-838
32. Wood N.D., Crane D.R., Schaalje G.B., et al. What works for whom: a meta-analytic review of marital and couples therapy in reference to marital distress. Am J Fam Ther 33 (2005) 273-287