Near-well nonlinear flow identified by various displacement well response testing

Ground Water

Volumn 47, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 526-535

  Zenner, Matthias A ^a  

^a FREIE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BOREHOLE IMAGING; CASED WELLS; CONTROLLED FLOW; DEVONIANS; FRACTURED RESERVOIR; GERMANY; HIGH RESOLUTION; INTERNAL HYDRAULIC; LIMESTONE FORMATION; NON-DARCIAN FLOW; NON-LINEAR RESPONSE; NONLINEAR FLOW; SOLID CYLINDERS; TECHNIQUES USED; TEST DESIGNS; TEST MODELS; WELLBORE;

BOREHOLES; CYLINDERS (SHAPES); IMAGING TECHNIQUES; LIMESTONE; NONLINEAR CONTROL SYSTEMS; PETROLEUM RESERVOIRS;

TESTING;

BOREHOLE; CAP ROCK; DEVONIAN; DISPLACEMENT; FLOW MODELING; FRACTURE NETWORK; HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY; IMAGING METHOD; LIMESTONE; WELL;

ARTICLE; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; METHODOLOGY; WATER FLOW;

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; WATER MOVEMENTS;

CENTRAL EUROPE; EURASIA; EUROPE; GERMANY;

EID: 68249126545     PISSN: 0017467X     EISSN: 17456584     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6584.2009.00545.x     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Armour, J.C., and J.N. Cannon. 1968. Fluid flow through woven screens. Journal of the American Institute of Chemical Engineers 14, no. 3 : 415 420.
2. Audouin, O., and J. Bodin. 2008. Cross-borehole slug test analysis in a fractured limestone aquifer. Journal of Hydrology 348, 510 523.
3. Barenblatt, G.I., and Yu.P. Zheltov. 1960. Basic flow equations for homogeneous fluids in naturally fractured rocks (in Russian). Dokl. Akad Nauk USSR 132, no. 3 : 545 548.
4. Barenblatt, G.I., Yu.P. Zheltov, and I.N. Kochina. 1960. Basic concepts in the theory of seepage of homogeneous liquids in fissured rocks (in Russian). Prikl Mat Mekh, 24, no. 5 : 852 864.
5. Barker, J.A. 1988. A generalized radial flow model for hydraulic tests in fractured rock. Water Resources Research 24, no. 10 : 1796 1804.
6. Barker, J.A., and J.H. Black. 1983. Slug tests in fissured aquifers. Water Resources Research 19, no. 6 : 1558 1564.
7. Belitz, K., and W. Dripps. 1999. Cross-well slug testing in unconfined aquifers: A case study from the Sleepers River watershed, Vermont. Ground Water 37, no. 3 : 438 447.
8. Black, J.H. 1985. The interpretation of slug tests in fissured rocks. Journal of Quarterly Engineering Geology 18, 161 171.
9. Boulton, N.S., and T.D. Streltsova. 1977. Unsteady flow to a pumped well in a fissured water-bearing formation. Journal of Hydrology 35, 257 269.
10. Bourdet, D. 2002. Well Test Analysis: The Use of Advanced Interpretation Models, Handbook of Petroleum Exploration and Production. Amsterdam : Elsevier.
11. Bourdet, D., and A.C. Gringarten. 1980. Determination of fissure volume and block size in fractured reservoirs by type curve analysis. SPE Paper 9293, presented at the SPE 55th Annual Fall Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, 21-24 September.
12. Chu, L., and A.S. Grader. 1991. Transient-pressure analysis for an interference slug test. SPE Paper 23444, presented at the SPE Eastern Regional Meeting, Lexington, Kentucky, October 22-25.
13. Clark, L., and P.A. Turner. 1983. Experiments to assess the hydraulic efficiency of well screens. Ground Water 21, no. 3 : 270 281.
14. Cooley, R.L., and A.B. Cunningham. 1979. Consideration of total energy loss in theory of flow to wells. Journal of Hydrology 43, 161 184.
15. Cooper, H.H. Jr., J.D. Bredehoeft, and I.S. Papadopulos. 1967. Response of a finite diameter well to an instantaneous charge of water. Water Resources Research 3, no. 1 : 263 269.
16. Dougherty, D.E., and D.K. Babu. 1984. Flow to a partially penetrating well in a double-porosity reservoir. Water Resources Research 20, no. 8 : 1116 1122.
17. Ferris, J.G., and D.B. Knowles. 1954. The slug test for estimating transmissibility. U.S. Geological Survey Ground Water Note 26, 1 7.
18. Garg, S.P., and J. Lal. 1971. Rational design of well screens, Proceedings of the American Society of Civil Engineers. Journal of the Irrigation and Drainage Division 97, 131 147.
19. Grader, A.S., and H.J. Ramey Jr. 1988. Slug-test analysis in double porosity reservoirs. SPE Formation Evaluation 3, no. 2 : 329 339.
20. Hvorslev, M.J. 1951. Time lag and soil permeability in ground-water observations. Bulletin No. 36. Vicksburg, Mississippi : Waterways Experiment Station, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 1 50.
21. Hyder, Z., J.J. Butler Jr., C.D. McElwee, and W. Liu. 1994. Slug tests in partially penetrating wells. Water Resources Research 30, no. 11 : 2945 2957.
22. Kabala, Z.J., G.F. Pinder, and P.C.D. Milly. 1985. Analysis of well-aquifer responses to a slug test. Water Resources Research 21, no. 9 : 1433 1436.
23. Karasaki, K. 1990. A systematized drillstem test. Water Resources Research 26, no. 12 : 2913 2919.
24. Karasaki, K., J.C.S. Long, and P.A. Witherspoon. 1988. Analytical models of slug tests. Water Resources Research 24, no. 1 : 115 126.
25. Kipp. K.L. Jr. 1985. Type curve analysis of inertial effects in the response of a well to a slug test. Water Resources Research 21, no. 9, 1397 1408.
26. Klotz, D. 1970a. Hydraulische Eigenschaften der Schlitzfilter. Bohrtechnik, Brunnenbau, Rohrleitungsbau 21, no. 10 : 369 376.
27. Klotz, D. 1970b. Hydraulische Eigenschaften der Schlitzfilter - Teil II, Bohrtechnik, Brunnenbau, Rohrleitungsbau 21, no. 11 : 411 416.
28. Klotz, D. 1969. Hydraulische Eigenschaften der Schlitzbrückenfilter. Bohrtechnik, Brunnenbau, Rohrleitungsbau 20, no. 12 : 451 459.
29. Kohl, T., K.F. Evans, R.J. Hopkirk, R. Jung, and L. Rybach. 1997. Observation and simulation of non-Darcian flow transients in fractured rock. Water Resources Research 33, no. 3 : 407 418.
30. Krauss, I. 1974. Die Bestimmung der Transmissivität von Grundwasserleitern aus dem Einschwingverhalten des Brunnen- Grundwasserleitersystems. Journal of Geophysics 40, 381 400.
31. Lee, J., and R.A. Wattenbarger. 2004. Gas Reservoir Engineering, vol. 5, 3rd ed. Richardson, Texas : Society of Petroleum Engineers Inc., SPE Textbook Series.
32. McElwee, C.D. 2001. Application of a nonlinear slug test model. Ground Water 39, no. 5 : 737 744.
33. McElwee, C.D., and M.A. Zenner. 1998. A nonlinear model for analysis of slug-test data. Water Resources Research 34, no. 1 : 55 66.
34. McElwee, C.D., G.C. Bohling, and J.J. Butler Jr. 1995a. Sensitivity analysis of slug tests. Part 1: The slugged well. Journal of Hydrology 164, 53 67.
35. McElwee, C.D., J.J. Butler Jr., G.C. Bohling, and W. Liu. 1995b. Sensitivity analysis of slug tests. Part 2: Observation wells. Journal of Hydrology 164, 69 87.
36. Moench, A.F. 1984. Double-porosity models for a fissured groundwater reservoir with fracture skin. Water Resources Research 20, no. 7 : 831 846.
37. Moench, A.F., and Hsieh, P.A. 1985. Analysis of slug test data in a well with finite thickness skin. In Memoires of the 17th International Congress on the Hydrogeology of Rocks of Low Permeability, vol. 17, 17 29. Tucson, Arizona : IAH.
38. Parsons, S.B. 1994. A re-evaluation of well design procedures. Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology 27, S31 S40.
39. Petersen, J.S., C. Rohwer, and M.L. Albertson. 1955. Effect of well screen on flow into wells. Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers 120, 563 585.
40. Ramey, H.J. Jr., R.G. Agarwal, and I. Martin. 1975. Analysis of "slug test" or DST flow period data. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology 14, no. 3 : 37 47.
41. Rorabaugh, M.I. 1953. Graphical and theoretical analysis of step-drawdown tests of artesian wells. Proceedings of the American Society of Civil Engineers, 79, no. 362, HY4 : 1 23.
42. Saldana-C, M.A., and H.J. Ramey Jr. 1986. Slug test and drillstem test flow phenomena including wellbore inertial and frictional effects. In Proceedings of the 56th Annual California Regional Meeting, Oakland, California, SPE paper 15118, 2-4 April, 249 263.
43. st SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. October 5-8, LA, New Orleans : 1 16.
44. Shapiro, A.M., and P.A. Hsieh. 1998. How good are estimates of transmissivity from slug tests in fractured rock? Ground Water 36, no. 1 : 37 48.
45. Singh, S.R., and S.K. Shakya. 1989. A nonlinear equation for groundwater entry into well screens. Journal of Hydrology 109, 95 114.
46. Spane, F.A. Jr. 1996. Applicability of slug interference tests for hydraulic characterization of unconfined aquifers. 1. Analytical assessment. Ground Water 34, no. 1 : 66 74.
47. Spane, F.A. Jr., P.D. Thorne, and L.C. Swanson. 1996. Applicability of slug interference tests for hydraulic characterization of unconfined aquifers. 2. Field examples. Ground Water 34, no. 5 : 925 933.
48. Springer, R.K., and L.W. Gelhar. 1991. Characterization of large scale aquifer heterogeneity in glacial outwash by analysis of slug tests with oscillatory response, Cape Cod, Masachussetts. In : U.S. Geological Survey, Toxic Substances Hydrology Program, ed. G. Mallard and D. Aronson. Proceedings of the Technical Meeting, Monterey, California, 11-15 March, USGS, WRI Report. 91-4034, Reston, Virginia, 36 40.
49. Stone, D.B., and G.K.C. Clarke. 1993. Estimation of subglacial hydraulic properties from induced changes in basal water pressure: A theoretical framework for borehole-response tests. Journal of Glaciology 39, no. 132 : 327 340.
50. Vaadia, Y., and Scott, V.H. 1958. Hydraulic properties of perforated well casings. Proceedings of the American Society of Civil Engineers, Journal of the Irrigation and Drainage Division, 84, no. IR1 : 1505-1 1505-26.
51. van der Kamp, G. 1976. Determining aquifer transmissivity by means of well response tests: The underdamped case. Water Resources Research 12, no. 1 : 71 77.
52. Wagner, R.M., and H.D. Voigt. 1991. Interpretation of slug test results from high productive wells. Oil Gas European Magazine 3, 23 28.
53. Warren, J.E., and P.J. Root. 1963. The behavior of naturally fractured reservoirs. Journal of the Society of Petroleum Engineers 3, no. 3 : 245 255.
54. Williams, E.B. 1981. Fundamental concepts of well design. Ground Water 19, no. 5 : 527 542.
55. Zenner, M.A. 2008. Experimental evidence of the applicability of colebrook and Borda Carnot-type head loss formulas in transient slug test analysis, ASCE. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 134, no. 5 : 644 651.
56. Zenner, M.A. 2006. Zum Einfluss bohrlochinterner hydraulischer Verluste auf Wasserstandsreaktionen Packer-induzierter Auffülltests. Grundwasser 11, no. 2 : 111 122.
57. Zenner, M.A. 2002. Analysis of slug tests in bypassed wells. Journal of Hydrology 263, 72 91.
58. Zenner, M.A. 2000. Zur Funktionsprüfung von Grundwassermessstellen: Bestimmung von Brunneneintrittsverlusten mittels Slug-Interferenz-Tests. Grundwasser 5, no. 2 : 67 78.
59. Zlotnik, V.A., and V.L. McGuire. 1998a. Multi-level slug tests in highly permeable formations. 1. Modification of the Springer-Gelhar (SG) model. Journal of Hydrology 204, 271 282.
60. Zlotnik, V.A., and V.L. McGuire. 1998b. Multi-level slug tests in highly permeable formations. 2. Hydraulic conductivity identification, method verification, and field application. Journal of Hydrology 204, 283 296.