Applicability of slug interference tests for hydraulic characterization of unconfined aquifers: (1) Analytical assessment

Ground Water

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 66-74

  Spane, F A ^a  

^a PACIFIC NORTHWEST NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GASTROPODA;

EID: 0011122143     PISSN: 0017467X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6584.1996.tb01866.x     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Black, J. H. and K. L. Kipp, Jr. 1981. Determination of hydrogeological parameters using sinusoidal pressure tests: A theoretical appraisal. Water Resources Research, v. 17, no. 3, pp. 696-692.
2. Boulton, N. S. and T. D. Streltsova. 1976. The drawdown near an abstraction well of large diameter under non-steady conditions in an unconfined aquifer. Journal of Hydrology, v. 30, pp. 29-46.
3. Brigham, W. E. 1970. Planning and analysis of pulse-tests. Journal of Petroleum Technology. May, pp. 618-624.
4. Cooper, H. H., J. D. Bredehoeft, and I. S. Papadopulos. 1967. Response of a finite-diameter well to an instantaneous charge of water. Water Resources Research, v. 3, no. 1, pp. 263-269.
5. Dawson, K. J. and J. D. Istok. 1991. Aquifer Testing: Design and Analysis of Pumping and Slug Tests. Lewis Publishers, Inc., Chelsea, MI.
6. Fenske, P. R. 1977. Radial flow with dischargjng-well and observation-well storage. Journal of Hydrology. v. 32, pp. 87-96.
7. Ferris, J. G. and D. B. Knowles. 1954. The slug test for estimating transmissibility. U.S. Geological Survey, Ground Water Note 26.
8. Hantush, M. S. 1964. Hydraulics of wells. In: Advances in Hydroscience. Editor, V. T. Chow. Academic Press, New York. v. 1, pp. 282-433.
9. Johnson, C. R., R. A. Greenkom, and E. G. Woods. 1966. Pulse-testing: A new method for describing reservoir flow properties between wells. Journal of Petroleum, v. 237, pp. 1599-1604.
10. Kamal, M. M. 1983. Interference and pulse testing - A review. Journal of Petroleum Technology. December, p. 2257-2270.
11. Karasaki, K., J.C.S. Long, and P. A. Witherspoon. 1988. Analytical models of slug tests. Water Resources Research. v. 24, no. 1, pp. 115-126.
12. Moench, A. F. 1993. Computation of type curves for flow to partially penetrating wells in water-table aquifers. Ground Water, v. 31, no. 6, pp. 966-971.
13. Neuman, S. P. 1972. Theory of flow in unconfined aquifers considering delayed response of the water table. Water Resources Research, v. 8, no. 4, pp. 1031-1045.
14. Neuman, S. P. 1974. Effect of partial penetration of flow in unconfined aquifer considering delayed gravity response. Water Resources Research. v. 10. no. 2, pp. 303-312.
15. Neuman, S. P. 1975. Analysis of pumping test data from anisotropic unconfined aquifers considering delayed gravity response. Water Resources Research, v. 11, no. 2, pp. 329-342.
16. Novakowski, K. S. 1989. Analysis of pulse interference tests. Water Resources Research. v. 25, no. 11, pp. 2377-2387.
17. Nowkowski, K. S. 1990. Analysis of aquifer test* conducted in fractured rock: A review of the physical background and the design of a computer program for for generating type curves. Ground Water. v. 28, no. 1, pp. 99-105.
18. Ogbe, D. and W. Brigham 1987. Pube testing with wellbore storage and ikin effects. SPE Formation Evaluation. March, pp 29-42.
19. Papadopulos, I.S. 1967. Drawdown distribution around a large-diameter well. Proceedings of the National Symposium on Ground-Water Hydrology. San Francisco. Nov.. Am. Water Resources AMOC Proc no. 4. pp. 157-168.
20. Peres, A. M. 1989. Analysts of stag and drilbtem tests. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. Univ. of Tulsa, OK.
21. Peres, A. M., M. Onur, and A. C. Reynolds. 1989. A new analysis procedure for determining aquifer properties from slug test data. Water Resources Research, v. 25, no. 7, pp. 1591-1602.
22. Ramey, H. J. Jr., R. G. Agarwal, and I. Martin. 1975. Analysis of 'slug test' or DST flow period data. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology. July-September, pp. 37-47.
23. Reed, J. E. 1980. Type curves for selected problems of flow to wells in confined aquifers. U.S. Geological Survey, Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations. Book 3, Applications of Hydraulics, Chapter B3.
24. Sageev, A. 1986. Slug test analysis. Water Resources Research, v. 22, no. 8, pp. 1323-1333.
25. Spane, F. A., Jr. 1992. Applicability of slug interference tests under Hanford site test conditions: Analytical assessment and field test evaluation. Pacific Northwest Laboratory, PNL-8070, Richland, WA.
26. Spane, F. A., Jr. and S. K. Wurstner. 1993. DERIV: A program for calculating pressure derivatives for use in hydraulic test analysis. Ground Water. v. 31, no. 5, pp. 814-822.
27. Theis, C. V. 1935. The relationship between the lowering of the piezometric surface and the rate and duration of discharge of a well using ground-water storage. Amer. Geophys. Union, Transactions, pt. 2, pp. 519-524. Reprinted in Society of Petroleum Engineers, "Pressure Transient Testing Methods," SPE Reprint Series. no. 14, pp. 27-32.
28. Theis, C. V. 1935. The relationship between the lowering of the piezometric surface and the rate and duration of discharge of a well using ground-water storage. Amer. Geophys. Union, Transactions, pt. 2, pp. 519-524. Reprinted in Society of Petroleum Engineers, "Pressure Transient Testing Methods," SPE Reprint Series. no. 14, pp. 27-32.
29. van Dyke, N.V.R., J. A. Rhodes, D. W. Richardson, and W. G. McTigue. 1993. Evaluating confined aquifer properties using the pneumatic displacement method and the repeated pressure pube technique. Proceedings of the Seventh National Outdoor Action Conference and Exposition, May 25-27, Las Vegas, NV, National Ground Water Assoc. pp. 405-419.
30. Walter, G. R. and G. M. Thompson. 1982. A repeated pulse technique for determining the hydraulic properties of tight formations. Ground Water. v. 20, no. 2, pp. 186-193.