Impact of wellbore-internal hydraulic head losses on packer-induced slug tests;Zum einfluss bohrlochinterner hydraulischer verluste auf wasserstandsreaktionen packer-induzierter auffülltests

Grundwasser

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 111-122

  Zenner, Matthias A ^a  

^a FREIE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AQUIFERS; DAMPING; DATA REDUCTION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; WATER WELLS; WELL TESTING;

BOREHOLE; HYDRAULIC HEAD; SLUG TEST;

EID: 33745102105     PISSN: 1430483X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00767-006-0132-0     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Box, G.E.P., LUCAS, H.L. (1959): Design of experiments in non-linear situations.- Biometrika 46: 77-90.
2. BRÜHL, H., OTTO, R., REICH, P. (1991): Auswertung van Pumpversuchen nach dem Einschwingverfahren.- Bohrtechnik, Brunnenbau, Rohrleitungsbau (bbr), 9: 367-374.
3. CACUCI, D.G. (1981): Sensitivity theory for nonlinear systems, 1, Nonlinear functional analysis approach.- Journal of Mathematical Physics 22/12:2794-2802.
4. CACUCI, D.G., WEBER, C.F., OBLOV, E.M., MARABLE, J.H. (1980): Sensitivity theory for general systems of nonlinear equations.- Nuclear Science & Engineering 75: 88-110.
5. COB, P.M., MCELWEE, C.D., BUTT, M.A. (1982): Analysis of leaky aquifer pumping test data: an automated numerical solution using sensitivity analysis.- Ground Water 20/3:325-333.
6. COOPER, H.H., JR., BREDEHOEFT, J.D., PAPADOPULOS, I.S. (1967): Response of finite-diameter well to an instantaneous charge of water. -Water Resources Research 3 (1): 263-269.
7. DOUGHERTY, D.E., BABU, D.K. (1984): Flow to a partially penetrating well in a double-porosity reservoir.- Water Resources Research 20/8:1116-1122.
8. FERRIS, J.G., KNOWLES, D.B. (1954): The slug test for estimating transmissibility.- U.S. Geological Survey Ground Water Note 26: 1-7.
9. HVORSLEV, M.J. (1951): Time lag and soil permeability in ground water observations.- Waterways Experiment Station, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Bulletin 36:1-50.
10. HYDER, Z., BUTLER JR., J.J., MCELWEE, C.D., LIU, W. (1994): Slug tests in partially penetrating Wells.- Water Resources Research 30/11: 2945-2957.
11. KABALA, Z.J., PINDER, G.F., MILLY, P.C.D. (1985): Analysis of well-aquifer responses to a slug test.- Water Resources Research 21/9:1433-1436.
12. KABALA, Z.J. (2001): Sensitivity analysis of a pumping test on a well with wellbore storage and skin.- Advances in Water Resources 24: 483-504.
13. KARASAKI, K., LONG, J.C.S., WITHERSPOON, P.A. (1988): Analytical Models of Slug Tests.- Water Resources Research 24/1:115-126.
14. KIPP, K.L., JR. (1985): Type curve analysis of inertial effects in the response of a well to a slug test.- Water Resources Research 21/9:1397-1408.
15. KODA, M., DOGRU, A.H. SEINFELD, J.H. (1979): Sensitivity analysis of partial differential equations with applications to reaction and diffusion processes.- Journal of Computational Physics 30: 259-282.
16. KRAUSS, I. (1974): Die Bestimmung der Transmissivität von Grundwasserleitern aus dem Einschwingverhalten des Brunnen- Grundwasserleitersystems.- Journal of Geophysics 40: 381-400.
17. KRAUSS, I. (1977): Das Einschwingverfahren - Transmissivitä tsbestimmung ohne Pumpversuche.- Gas Wasserfach-Wasser/Abwasser 118/9: 407-410.
18. LEVEN, C. (2002): Effects of heterogeneous parameter distributions on hydraulic tests - Analysis and assessment.- Tübinger Geowissenschaftliche Arbeiten (TGA), C65.- 88 S., 65 Abb., 7 Tab.; Tübingen.
19. MCELWEE, C.D. (1982): Sensitivity analysis and the ground water inverse problem.- Ground Water 20/6: 723-735.
20. MCELWEE, C.D. (1987): Sensitivity analysis of groundwater models. In: BEAR, J., CORAPCIOGLU, M.Y. (Hrsg.): Advances in transport phenomena in porous media.- Ser. E. 128: 751-817, NATO Advanced Study Institute.
21. MCELWEE, C.D. (2001): Application of a nonlinear slug test model.-Ground Water 39/5: 737-744.
22. MCELWEE, C.D. (2002): Improving the analysis of slug tests.- Journal of Hydrology: 269: 122-133.
23. MCELWEE, C.D., BOHLING, G.C., BUTLER, J.J., JR. (1995a): Sensitivity analysis of slug tests. Part 1: The slugged well.- Journal of Hydrology 164: 53-67.
24. MCELWEE, C.D., BUTLER, J.J., JR., BOHLING, G.C., LIU, W. (1995b): Sensitivity analysis of slug tests. Part 2: Observation wells.- Journal of Hydrology 164: 69-87.
25. MCELWEE, C.D., ZENNER, M.A. (1998): A nonlinear model for analysis of slug-test data.- Water Resources Research 34/1: 55-66.
26. MOENCH, A.F., HSIEH, P.A. (1985): Analysis of slug test data in a well with finite thickness skin.- Memoires of the 17th International Congress on the Hydrogeology of Rocks of Low Permeability 17:17-29.
27. RAMEY, H.J., AGARWAL, R.G., MARTIN, I. (1975): Analysis of slug test' or DST flow period.- Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology 14/3: 37-47.
28. th Annual California Regional Meeting, SPE Paper 15118: 249-263, April 2-4, 1986, Oakland, CA.
29. STONE, D.B., CLARKE, G.K.C. (1993): Estimation of subglacial hydraulic properties from induced changes in basal water pressure: A theoretical framework for borehole-response tests.- Journal of Glaciology 39/132:327-340.
30. SYKES, J.R, WILSON, J.L., ANDREWS, R.W. (1985): Sensitivity analysis for steady state groundwater flow using adjoint operators.- Water Resources Research 21/3: 359-371.
31. VAN DER KAMP, G. (1976): Determining aquifer transmissivity by means of well response tests: The underdamped case.- Water Resources Research 12/1: 71-77.
32. WAGNER, R.M., VOIGT, H.D. (1991): Interpretation of slug test results from high productive wells.- Oil Gas European Magazine 3: 23-28.
33. nd ed.- 732 S., 256 Abb., 31 Tab.; New York.
34. ZENNER, M.A. (1998): Analysis of nonlinear responses to a slug test, Part 1: Wells completed in confined formations.- Mathematische Geologie 2: 95-109.
35. ZENNER, M.A. (2000). Zur Funktionsprüfung von Grundwassermessstellen: Bestimmung von Brunneneintrittsverlusten mittels Slug-Interferenz-Tests.- Grundwasser 5 (2): 67-78.
36. ZENNER, M.A. (2002). Analysis of slug tests in bypassed wells.- Journal of Hydrology 263: 72-91.
37. ZLOTNIK, V.A., MCGUIRE, V.L. (1998a): Multi-Level slug tests in highly permeable formations : 1. Modification of the Springer-Gelhar (SG) model.- Journal of Hydrology 204: 271-282.
38. ZLOTNIK, V.A., MCGUIRE, V.L. (1998b): Multi-Level slug tests in highly permeable formations : 2. Hydraulic conductivity identification, method verification, and field applications.- Journal of Hydrology 204: 283-296.