Bayesian modelling of lung cancer risk and bitumen fume exposure adjusted for unmeasured confounding by smoking

Occupational and Environmental Medicine

Volumn 66, Issue 8, 2009, Pages 502-508

  De Vocht, Frank ^a,b   Kromhout, H ^c   Ferro, G ^b   Boffetta, P ^b   Burstyn, I ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b INTERNATIONAL AGENCY FOR RESEARCH ON CANCER   (France)

^c UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ASPHALT;

ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; CANCER RISK; CIGARETTE SMOKING; COHORT ANALYSIS; DISEASE MODEL; HUMAN; LUNG CANCER; OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT;

AIR POLLUTANTS, OCCUPATIONAL; BAYES THEOREM; BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); COHORT STUDIES; CONFOUNDING FACTORS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); EUROPE; HUMANS; HYDROCARBONS; INHALATION EXPOSURE; ISRAEL; LUNG NEOPLASMS; MALE; OCCUPATIONAL DISEASES; OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE; RISK; SMOKE; SMOKING;

EID: 68149181718     PISSN: 13510711     EISSN: 14707926     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/oem.2008.042606     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Blair A, Stewart P, Lubin JH, et al. Methodological issues regarding confounding and exposure misclassification in epidemiological studies of occupational exposures. Am J Ind Med 2007;50:199-207. (Pubitemid 46363811)
2. Grimes AD, Schulz KF. Bias and causal associations in observational research. Lancet 2002;359:248-252
3. Ahlbom A, Steineck G. Aspects of misclassification of confounding factors. Am J Ind Med 1992;21:107-112
4. Fewell Z, Davey SG, Sterne JA. The impact of residual and unmeasured confounding in epidemiologic studies: a simulation study. Am J Epidemiol 2007;166:646-655 (Pubitemid 47347902)
5. Greenland S, Robins JM. Identifiability, exchangeability, and epidemiological confounding. Int J Epidemiol 1986;15:413-419
6. Steenland K, Greenland S. Monte Carlo sensitivity analysis and Bayesian analysis of smoking as an unmeasured confounder in a study of silica and lung cancer. Am J Epidemiol 2004;160:384-392 (Pubitemid 39045270)
7. Sturmer T, Schneeweiss S, Avorn J, et al. Adjusting effect estimates for unmeasured confounding with validation data using propensity score calibration. Am J Epidemiol 2005;162:279-289 (Pubitemid 41373532)
8. Greenland S. Basic methods for sensitivity analysis of biases. Int J Epidemiol 1996;25:1107-1116 (Pubitemid 27013514)
9. Axelson O, Steenland K. Indirect methods of assessing the effects of tobacco use in occupational studies. Am J Ind Med 1988;13:105-118 (Pubitemid 18034019)
10. Kriebel D, Zeka A, Eisen EA, et al. Quantitative evaluation of the effects of uncontrolled confounding by alcohol and tobacco in occupational cancer studies. Int J Epidemiol 2004;33:1040-1045 (Pubitemid 39429997)
11. MacLehose RF, Kaufman S, Kaufman JS, et al. Bounding causal effects under uncontrolled confounding using counterfactuals. Epidemiology 2005;16:548-555 (Pubitemid 40847841)
12. Greenland S. Sensitivity analysis, Monte Carlo risk analysis, and Bayesian uncertainty assessment. Risk Anal 2001;21:579-583
13. Molitor J, Molitor NT, Jerrett M, et al. Bayesian modeling of air pollution health effects with missing exposure data. Am J Epidemiol 2006;164:69-76. (Pubitemid 43946293)
14. Gryparis A, Coull BA, Schwartz J. Controlling for confounding in the presence of measurement error in hierarchical models: a Bayesian approach. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 2007;17:S20-S28. (Pubitemid 350273671)
15. Binet S, Pfohl-Leszkowicz A, Brandt H, et al. Bitumen fumes: review of work on the potential risk to workers and the present knowledge on its origin. Sci Total Environ 2002;300:37-49. (Pubitemid 35430167)
16. Hooiveld M, Spee T, Burstyn I, et al. Lung cancer mortality in a Dutch cohort of asphalt workers: evaluation of possible confounding by smoking. Am J Ind Med 2003;43:79-87. (Pubitemid 36068837)
17. Mundt DJ, van Wijngaarden E, Mundt KA. An assessment of the possible extent of confounding in epidemiological studies of lung cancer risk among roofers. J Occup Environ Hyg 2007;4(S1):163-174
18. Schulte PA. Gaps in scientific knowledge about the carcinogenic potential of asphalt/bitumen fumes. J Occup Environ Hyg 2007;4(Suppl 1):3-5.
19. Partanen T, Boffetta P. Cancer risk in asphalt workers and roofers: review and meta-analysis of epidemiologic studies. Am J Ind Med 1994;26:721-740 (Pubitemid 24377287)
20. Boffetta P, Burstyn I, Partanen T, et al. Cancer mortality among European asphalt workers: an international epidemiological study. I. Results of the analysis based on job titles. Am J Ind Med 2003;43:18-27.
21. Boffetta P, Burstyn I, Partanen T, et al. Cancer mortality among European asphalt workers: an international epidemiological study. II. Exposure to bitumen fume and other agents. Am J Ind Med 2003;43:28-39. (Pubitemid 36068833)
22. IARC. Tobacco smoke and involuntary smoking. IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans. Vol 83. Lyon: IARC Press, 2004.
23. Burstyn I, Boffetta P, Kauppinen T, et al. Performance of different exposure assessment approaches in a study of bitumen fume exposure and lung cancer mortality. Am J Ind Med 2003;43:40-48 (Pubitemid 36074875)
24. Burstyn I, Boffetta P, Kauppinen T, et al. Estimating exposures in the asphalt industry for an international epidemiological cohort study of cancer risk. Am J Ind Med 2003;43:3-17. (Pubitemid 36074873)
25. Simonato L, Agudo A, Ahrens W, et al. Lung cancer and cigarette smoking in Europe: an update of risk estimates and an assessment of inter-country heterogeneity. Int J Cancer 2001;91:876-887 (Pubitemid 32178660)
26. Connor RJ, Mosimann JE. Concepts of independence for proportions with a generalization of the Dirichlet distribution. J Am Stat Assoc 1969;64:194-206.
27. Lunn DJ, Thomas A, Best N, et al. WINBUGS -- a Bayesian modelling framework: concepts, structure, and extensibility. Statistics and Computing 2000;10:325-337
28. Kauppinen T, Heikkila P, Partanen T, et al. Mortality and cancer incidence of workers in Finnish road paving companies. Am J Ind Med 2003;43:49-57. (Pubitemid 36068834)
29. McCandless LC, Gustafson P, Levy A. Bayesian sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding in observational studies. Stat Med 2007;26:2331-2347 (Pubitemid 46730252)
30. de Vocht F, Burstyn I, Ferro G, et al. Sensitivity of the association between increased lung cancer risk and bitumen fume exposure to the assumptions in the assessment of exposure. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2008 Oct 28 [Epub ahead of print].
31. Sorensen G, Barbeau E, Hunt MK, et al. Reducing social disparities in tobacco use: a social-contextual model for reducing tobacco use among blue-collar workers. Am J Public Health 2004;94:230-239 (Pubitemid 38176315)
32. Lee DJ, LeBlanc W, Fleming LE, et al. Trends in US smoking rates in occupational groups: the National Health Interview Survey 1987-1994. J Occup Environ Med 2004;46:538-548
33. Fayerweather WE. Meta-analysis of lung cancer in asphalt roofing and paving workers with external adjustment for confounding by coal tar. J Occup Environ Hyg 2007;4:175-200.
34. Burstyn I, Kromhout H. Still no evidence that coal tar exposure confounded the association between bitumen/asphalt fume and lung cancer in the cohort of European asphalt workers. J Occup Environ Hyg 2008;5:D73-D75.