Elucidating molecular overlays from pairwise alignments using a genetic algorithm

Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling

Volumn 49, Issue 7, 2009, Pages 1847-1855

  Jones, Gareth ^a   Gao, Yinghong ^a   Sage, Carleton R ^a  

^a ARENA PHARMACEUTICALS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BINDING ENERGY; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; GENETIC ALGORITHMS; MOLECULES; PROTEINS; SOFTWARE TESTING;

ACTIVE COMPOUNDS; ACTIVE MOLECULES; DISTANCE GEOMETRY; LIGAND BINDING MODE; LIGAND STRUCTURE; MOLECULAR CONFORMERS; PAIRWISE ALIGNMENT; RIGID CONFORMERS;

LIGANDS;

LIGAND; PROTEIN;

ALGORITHM; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; CONFORMATION; DRUG DEVELOPMENT; HUMAN; METABOLISM; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; X RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHY;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; CRYSTALLOGRAPHY, X-RAY; DRUG DISCOVERY; HUMANS; LIGANDS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR CONFORMATION; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEINS;

EID: 68149170464     PISSN: 15499596     EISSN: 1549960X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ci900109n     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Hardy, L. W.; Malikayil, A. The Impact of Structure-Guided Drug Design on Clinical Agents. Curr. Drug. Discovery 2003, 15, 15-20.
2. Walters, W. P.; Stahl, M. T.; Murko, M. A. Virtual screening: an overview. Drug Discovery. Today 1998, 3, 160-178.
3. Bacilieri, M.; Moro, S. Ligand-based drug design methodologies in drug discovery process: an overview. Curr. Drug Discovery Technol. 2006, 3, 155-165.
4. Lemmen, C.; Lengauer, T. Computational methods for the structural alignment of molecules. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 2000, 14 (3), 215-232.
5. Jain, A. N. Ligand-based structural hypotheses for virtual screening. J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47 (4), 947-961.
6. Martin, Y. C.; Bures, M. G.; Danaher, E. A.; DeLazzer, J.; DeLazzer, J.; Lico, I.; Pavlik, P. A. A fast new approach to pharmacophore mapping and its application to dopaminergic and benzodiazepine agonists. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1993, 7 (1), 83-102.
7. Barnum, D.; Greene, J.; Smellie, A.; Sprague, P. Identification of common functional configurations among molecules. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1996, 36 (3), 563-571.
8. Labute, P.; Williams, C.; Feher, M.; Sourial, E.; Schmidt, J. M. Flexible Alignment of Small Molecules. J. Med. Chem. 2001, 44 (10), 1483-1490.
9. Jones, G.; Willett, P.; Glen, R. C. A genetic algorithm for flexible molecular overlay and pharmacophore elucidation. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1995, 9 (6), 532-548.
10. Cho, S. J.; Sun, Y. FLAME: A Program to Flexibly Align Molecules. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2006, 46 (1), 298-306.
11. Miller, M. D.; Fluder, E. M.; Castonguay, L. A.; Culberson, J. C.; Mosley, R. T.; Prendergast, K.; Kearsley, S. K.; Sheridan, R. P. MEGA-SQ: a method using the SQuEAL function to find the optimal superposition of several quasi-flexible molecules. Med. Chem. Res. 1999, 9 (7/8), 513-534.
12. Lemmen, C.; Lengauer, T.; Klebe, G. FLEXS: A Method for Fast Flexible Ligand Superposition. J. Med. Chem. 1998, 41 (23), 4502-4520.
13. Kearsley, S. K.; Smith, G. M. An alternative method for the alignment of molecular structures: maximizing electrostatic and steric overlap. Tetrahedron Comput. Methodol. 1990, 3 (6c), 615-633.
14. Iwase, K.; Hirono, S. Estimation of active conformations of drugs by a new molecular superposing procedure. J. Compul.-Aided Mol. Des. 1999, 13 (5), 499-512.
15. Miller, M. D.; Sheridan, R. P.; Kearsley, S. K. SQ: A Program for Rapidly Producing Pharmacophorically Relevant Molecular Superpositions. J. Med. Chem. 1999, 42 (9), 1505-1514.
16. ROCS, version 2.3.1; Openeye Scientific Software: Santa Fe, NM, 2007.
17. Omega, version 2.2.1; Openeye Scientific Software: Santa Fe, NM, 2007.
18. Berman, H. M.; Westbrook, J.; Feng, Z.; Gilliland, G.; Bhat, T. N.; Weissig, H.; Shindyalov, I. N.; Bourne, P. E. The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000, 28 (1), 235-242.
19. Chen, Q.; Higgs, R. E.; Vieth, M. Geometric Accuracy of Three-Dimensional Molecular Overlays. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2006, 46 (5), 1996-2002.
20. MOE, version 2007.09; Chemical Computing Group: Montreal, Canada, 2007.
21. Davis, L. Handbook of genetic algorithms; Van Nostrand Reinhold: New York, 1991.
22. Jones, G.; Willett, P.; Glen, R. C.; Leach, A. R.; Taylor, R. Development and validation of a genetic algorithm for flexible docking. J. Mol. Biol. 1997, 267 (3), 727-748.
23. Goldberg, D. E. Genetic algorithms in search, optimization, and machine learning; Addison-Wesley Pub. Co: Reading, MA, 1989.
24. Crippen, G.; Havel, T. Distance Geometry and Molecular Conformation; Research Studies Press: Taunton, England, 1988.
25. Lindholm, T.; Yellin, F. The Java virtual machine specification; Addison-Wesley: Reading, MA, 1996.
26. Huang, N.; Shoichet, B. K.; Irwin, J. J. Benchmarking Sets for Molecular Docking. J. Med. Chem. 2006, 49, 6789-6801.
27. Soliva, R.; Gelpi, J. L.; Almansa, C.; Virgili, M.; Orozco, M. Dissection of the Recognition Properties of p38 MAP Kinase. Determination of the Binding Mode of a New Pyridinyl-Heterocycle Inhibitor Family. J. Med. Chem. 2007, 50 (2), 283-293.
28. Kubinyi, H.; Folkers, G.; Martin, Y. C. 3D QSAR in drug design; Kluwer/ESCOM: Dordrecht, 1998.
29. Cramer, R. D.; Patterson, D. E.; Bunce, J. D. Comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA). 1. Effect of shape on binding of steroids to carrier proteins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 5959-5967.