Instructor and student classroom interactions during technology skills instruction for facilitating preservice teachers' computer self-efficacy

Journal of Educational Computing Research

Volumn 40, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 211-228

  Koh, Joyce ^a   Frick, Theodore ^b  

^a NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 68149148342     PISSN: 07356331     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2190/EC.40.2.d     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Abbitt, J. T., & Klett, M. D. (2007). Identifying influences on attitudes and self-efficacy beliefs towards technology integration among preservice educators. Electronic Journal for the Integration of Technology in Education, 6, 28-42.
2. Albion, P. R. (2001). Some factors in the development of self-efficacy beliefs for computer use among teacher education students. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 9(3), 321-347.
3. Anderson, S. E., & Maninger, R. M. (2007). Preservice teachers' abilities, beliefs, and intentions regarding technology integration. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 37(2), 151-172.
4. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215.
5. Beyerbach, B., Walsh, C., & Vannatta, R. (2001). From teaching technology to using technology to enhance student learning: Preservice teachers' changing perceptions of technology infusion. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 105-127.
6. Bruning, R. H., Schraw, G. J., Norby, M. M., & Ronning, R. R (2004). Cognitive psychology and instruction. New Jersey: Pearson Education Inc.
7. Brush, T., Glazewiski, K., Rutowiski, K., Berg, K., Stromfors, C., Van-Nest, M. H., et al. (2003). Integrating technology in a field-based teacher training program: The PT3@ASU project. Educational Technology Research and Development, 51(1), 57-72.
8. Collier, S., Weinburgh, M. H., & Rivera, M. (2004). Infusing technology skills into a teacher education program: Change in students' knowledge about and use of technology. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 12(3), 447-468.
9. Compeau, D. R., & Higgins, C. A. (1995). Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 189-211.
10. Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11. Duran, M., Fossum, P. R., & Leura, G. R. (2006). Technology and pedagogical renewal: Conceptualizing technology integration into teacher preparation. Computers in the Schools, 23(3), 31-54.
12. Ertmer, P. A., Evenbeck, E., Cennamo, K. S., & Lehman, J. D. (1994). Enhancing self-efficacy for computer technologies through the use of positive classroom experiences. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(3), 45-62.
13. Frick, T. W., & Semmel, M. (1978). Observer agreement and reliabilities of classroom observation measures. Review of Educational Research, 8(10), 157-184.
14. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago, IL: Aldine Publishing.
15. Hargrave, C. P., & Hsu, Y. S. (2000). Survey of instructional technology courses for preservice teachers. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 8(4), 303-314.
16. Handler, M. G. (1993). Preparing new teachers to use computer technology: Perceptions and suggestions for teacher educators? Computers Education, 20(2), 147-156.
17. Johnson, R. D., & Marakas, G. M. (2000). Research report: The role of behavioral modeling in computer skills acquisition-Toward refinement of the model. Information Systems Research, 11(4) , 402-417.
18. Kay, R. H. (2006). Evaluating strategies used to incorporate technology into preservice education: A review. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38(4), 383-408.
19. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20. Litterell, A. B., Zagumny, M. J., & Zagumny, L. L. (2005). Contextual and psychological predictors of instructional technology use in rural classrooms. Educational Research Quarterly, 29(2), 37-47.
21. Marakas, G. M., Yi, M. M., & Johnson, R. D. (1998). The multilevel and multifaceted character of computer self-efficacy: Toward clarification of the construct and an integrative framework for research. Information Systems Research, 9(2), 126-162.
22. Ma, Y., Lai, G., Williams, D., Prejean, L., & Ford, M. (2008). Exploring the effectiveness of a field experience program in a pedagogical laboratory: The experience of teacher candidates. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 16(4), 411-433.
23. Milbrath, Y. L., & Kinzie, M. B. (2000). Computer technology training for prospective teachers: Computer attitudes and perceived self-efficacy. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 8(4), 373-396.
24. Milman, N. B., & Molebash, P. E. (2008). A longitudinal assessment of teacher education students' confidence toward using technology. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 28(2), 183-200.
25. Negishi, M., Elder, A. D., Hamil, J. B., & Mzoughi, T. (2003). Predicting elementary education candidates' technology integration during their field placement instruction. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association, Biloxi, MI.
26. Pellegrino, J. W., & Altman, J. E. (1997). Information technology and teacher preparation: Some critical issues and illustrative solutions. Peabody Journal of Education, 72(1), 89-121.
27. Pope, M., Hare, D., & Howard, E. (2002). Technology integration: Closing the gap between what preservice teachers are taught to do and what they can do. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10(2), 191-203.
28. Ropp, M. M. (1999). Exploring individual characteristics associated with learning to use computers in preservice teacher preparation. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 31(4), 402-424.
29. Schunk, D. H. (1991). Self-efficacy and academic motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26(3&4), 207-231.
30. Snider, S. L. (2003). Exploring technology integration in a field-based teacher education program: Implementation efforts and findings. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34(3), 230-249.
31. Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
32. Stipek, D. (2002). Motivation to learn: Integrating theory and practice. Massachusetts: Pearson Education.
33. Strudler, N. B., & Wetzel, K. (1999). Lessons from exemplary colleges of education: Factors affecting technology integration in preservice programs. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(4), 63-81.
34. Torkzadeh, R., Pflughoeft, K., & Hall, L. (1999). Computer self-efficacy, training effectiveness and user attitudes: An empirical study. Behavior & Information Technology, 18(4), 299-309.
35. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
36. Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17, 89-100.
37. Wozney, L., Venkatesh, V., & Abrami, P. C. (2006). Implementing computer technologies: Teachers' perceptions and practices. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 14(1), 173-207.
38. Yin, R. K. (2003). Analyzing case study evidence. In Case study research: Design and methods (1st ed., pp. 109-140). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
39. Zhao, Y., Pugh, K., Sheldon, S., & Byers, J. L. (2002). Conditions for classroom technology innovations. Teachers College Record, 104(3), 482-515.