The literature of occupational science: A systematic, quantitative examination of peer-reviewed publications from 1996–2006

Journal of Occupational Science

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 92-103

  Glover, Jennifer S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

History; Occupational science; Research; Research methodology

Indexed keywords

EID: 68149126713     PISSN: 14427591     EISSN: 21581576     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14427591.2009.9686648     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Abbott, A. (1988). The system of professions: An essay on the division of expert labor. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
2. Burke, J. P. (2001). How therapists’ conceptual perspectives influence early intervention evaluations. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 8, 49-61.
3. Carlson, M., & Clark, F. (1991). The search for useful methodologies in occupational science. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 45(3), 235-241.
4. Carlson, M., Clark, F., & Young, B. (1998). Practical contributions of occupational science to the art of successful ageing: How to sculpt a meaningful life in older adulthood. Journal of Occupational Science, 5(3), 107-118.
5. Christiansen, C. H., & Matuska, K. M. (2006). Lifestyle balance: A review of concepts and research. Journal of Occupational Science, 13(1), 49-61.
6. Clark, F (1997). Reflections on the human as an occupational being: Biological need, tempo and temporality. Journal of Occupational Science: Australia, 4(3), 86-92.
7. Clark, F (2006). One person’s thoughts on the future of occupational science. Journal of Occupational Science, 13(3), 167-179.
8. Clark, F, & Lawlor, M. C. (2009). The making and mattering of occupational science. In E. B. Crepeau, E. S. Cohn & B. A. B. Schell (Eds.), Willard and Spackman’s occupational therapy (11th ed., pp. 2-14). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
9. Clark, F, Parham, D., Carlson, M., Frank, G., Jackson, J., Pierce, D., et al. (1991). Occupational science: Academic innovation in the service of occupational therapy’s future. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 45(4), 300-310.
10. Gibson, G., Timlin, A., Curran, S., & Wattis, J. (2004). The scope for qualitative methods in research and clinical trials in dementia. Age and Ageing, 33, 422-426.
11. Ha, T. C., Tan, S. B., & Soo, K. C. (2006). The journal impact factor: Too much of an impact. Annals of the Academy of Medicine of Singapore, 35, 911-916.
12. Hocking, C. (2000). Occupational science: A stock take of accumulated insights. Journal of Occupational Science, 7(2), 58-67.
13. Howe, K., & Eisenhart, M. (1990). Standards for qualitative (and quantitative) research: A prolegomenon. Educational Researcher, 19(4), 2-9.
14. Iwarsson, S., Samuelsson, G., & Hagberg, B. (1999). Occupation: Construct validity and empirical testing of predicting factors in an ageing population. Occupational Therapy International, 6(2), 77-89.
15. Jackson, J., Carlson, M., Mandel, D., Zemke, R., & Clark, F (1998). Occupation in lifestyle redesign: The well elderly study occupational therapy program. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 52, 326-336.
16. Lee, K. P, Boyd, E. A., Holroyd-Leduc, J. M., Bacchetti, P, & Bero, L. A. (2006). Predictors of publication: Characteristics of submitted manuscripts associated with acceptance at major biomedical journals. Medical Journal of Australia, 184(12), 621-626.
17. Lunt, A. (1997). Occupational science and occupational therapy: Negotiating the boundary between a discipline and a profession. Journal of Occupational Science: Australia, 4(2), 56-61.
18. Molassiotis, A., Gibson, F, Kelly, D., Richardson, A., Dabbour, R., Ahmad, A. M.-A., et al. (2006). A systematic review of worldwide cancer nursing research. Cancer Nursing, 29(6), 431-440.
19. Molke, D. K., Laliberte-Rudman, D., & Polatajko, H. J. (2004). The promise of occupational science: A developmental assessment of an emerging academic discipline. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 71(5), 269-281.
20. Mounter, C., & Ilott, I. (1997). Occupational science: A journey of discovery in the United Kingdom. Journal of Occupational Science, 4(2), 50-55.
21. Oermann, M. H., Nordstrom, C. K., Wilmes, N. A., Denison, D., Webb, S. A., Featherston, D. E., et al. (2008). Information sources for developing the nursing literature. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 45, 580-587.
22. Ottenbacher, K. (1991). Epistemology and experimentation: An examination of quality factors in research design. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 45(10), 917-923.
23. Ottenbacher, K. (1996). Academic disciplines: Maps for professional development. In R. Zemke & F. Clark (Eds.), Occupational science: The evolving discipline (pp. 329-330). Philadelphia, PA: F. A. Davis.
24. Pagano, M., & Gauvreau, K. (2000). Principles of biostatistics (2nd ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Duxbury.
25. Polkinghorne, D. E. (2004). Practice and the human sciences. Albany, New York: State University of NY Press.
26. Polkinghorne, D. E. (2007). Validity issues in narrative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 13(4), 471-486.
27. Schisler, A. M. C., & Polatajko, H. J. (2002). The individual as mediator of the person-occupation-environment interaction: Learning from the experience of refugees. Journal of Occupational Science, 9(2), 82-92.
28. Seglen, P. O. (1997). Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. British Medical Journal, 314, 498-502.
29. Tickle-Degnen, L., & Bedell, G. (2003). Heterarchy and hierarchy: A critical appraisal of the “levels of evidence” as a tool for clinical decision making. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 57, 234-237.
30. Whiteford, G. (2003). Enhancing occupational opportunities in communities: Politics’ third way and the concept of the enabling state. Journal of Occupational Science, 10(1), 40-45.
31. Wicks, A., & Whiteford, G. (2006). Conceptual and practical issues in qualitative research: Reflections on a life-history study. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 13, 94-100.
32. Wilcock, A. A. (1998). Reflections on doing, being, and becoming. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 65, 248-256.
33. Wilcock, A. A. (2003a). Making sense of what people do: Historical perspectives. Journal of Occupational Science, 10(1), 4-6.
34. Wilcock, A. A. (2003b). A science of occupation: Ancient or modern. Journal of Occupational Science, 10(3), 115-119.
35. Wilcock, A. A. (2007). Occupation and health: Are they one and the same? Journal of Occupational Science, 14(1), 3-8.
36. Wood, W., Nielson, C., Humphry, R., Coppola, S., Baranek, G., & Rourk, J. (2000). A curricular renaissance: Graduate education centered on occupation. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 54, 586-597.
37. Yerxa, E. (1998). Occupation: The keystone of a curriculum for a self-defined profession. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 52, 365-372.
38. Yerxa, E. (2000). Confessions of an occupational therapist who became a detective. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 53(5), 192-199.
39. Yerxa, E., Clark, H, Jackson, J., Parham, D., Pierce, D., Stein, C., et al. (1989). An introduction to occupational science: A foundation for occupational therapy in the 21st century. Occupational Therapy in Health Care, 6(4), 1-17.
40. Yonge, O., Austin, W., Qiuping, P. Z., Wacko, M., Wilson, S., & Zaleski, J. (1997). A systematic review of the psychiatric/ mental health nursing research literature 1982-1992. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 4, 171-177.
41. Zemke, R., & Clark, H (1996). Preface. In R. Zemke & h Clark (Eds.), Occupational science: The evolving discipline (pp. vii-xx). Philadelphia, PA: h A. Davis.